[1]刘丹丹,王 彬,于雪晶.不同采血方法在血常规检验中的应用价值研究[J].医学信息,2019,32(07):172-174.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.07.055]
　LIU Dan-dan,WANG Bin,YU Xue-jing.Study on the Application Value of Different Blood Collection Methods in Blood Routine Examination[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(07):172-174.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.07.055]
点击复制

不同采血方法在血常规检验中的应用价值研究()

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
32卷
期数:
2019年07期
页码:
172-174
栏目:
诊疗技术
出版日期:
2019-04-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on the Application Value of Different Blood Collection Methods in Blood Routine Examination
文章编号:
1006-1959（2019）07-0172-03
作者:
刘丹丹; 王 彬; 于雪晶
（黑龙江省佳木斯市疾病预防控制中心微生物检验科，黑龙江 佳木斯 154007）
Author(s):
LIU Dan-dan; WANG Bin; YU Xue-jing
(Department of Microbiology,Jiamusi City Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Jiamusi 154007,Heilongjiang,China)
关键词:
采血; 动脉; 静脉; 血常规; 检验
Keywords:
Blood collection; Artery; Vein; Blood routine; Test
分类号:
R446.1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.07.055
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 研究不同采血方法对血常规检验的影响。方法 选取2015年10月~2017年10月我中心进行血常规检验的96例患者作为研究对象，随机分为A、B、C三组，每组32例。A组采用动脉采血方法，B组采用静脉采血方法，C组采用末梢采血方法。对比三组患者血常规检查情况，分析三种采血方法对血常规检验结果的影响。结果 A、B两组患者血常规检查WBC、RBC、PLT、Hb、HCT、MCV、MCH以及MCHC水平对比，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；C组患者MCH水平与A、B两组比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；C组患者WBC、MCV水平高于A、B两组，RBC、PLT、Hb、HCT、MCHC水平低于A、B两组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。C组患者血常规WBC、RBC、PLT、Hb、HCT、MCV、MCH以及MCHC平均CV值高于A、B两组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 静脉采血和动脉采血的血常规检验结果相似，较为准确，便于临床应用，静脉采血可在临床推广使用。
Abstract:
Objective To study the effects of different blood collection methods on blood routine tests. Methods A total of 96 patients who underwent routine blood tests from October 2015 to October 2017 were randomly divided into three groups: A, B, and C, with 32 patients in each group. Group A was treated with arterial blood collection, group B was treated with venous blood collection, and group C was treated with peripheral blood collection. The blood routine examination of the three groups of patients was compared, and the effects of the three blood collection methods on the blood routine test results were analyzed.Results There were no significant differences in WBC, RBC, PLT, Hb, HCT, MCV, MCH and MCHC between the two groups (P>0.05). The MCH levels in group C were compared with those in groups A and B,the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The levels of WBC and MCV in group C were higher than those in group A and B. The levels of RBC, PLT, Hb, HCT and MCHC were lower than those in groups A and B,the difference was statistically significant. (P<0.05). The mean CV values of blood routine WBC, RBC, PLT, Hb, HCT, MCV, MCH and MCHC in group C were higher than those in group A and B,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion The routine blood test results of venous blood collection and arterial blood collection are similar, accurate and convenient for clinical application. The venous blood collection can be used in clinical practice.

参考文献/References:


[1]奚敏芬.不同采血方法进行血常规检验在临床应用中的研究[J].中国卫生标准管理,2015,28(31):146-147.
[2]彭科燕.末梢血和静脉血两种不同采血方法进行血常规检验的临床应用研究[J].现代诊断与治疗,2017,28(11):88-89.
[3]李晓峰,常红叶,齐力,等.临床血常规检验中不同采血方式的结果分析[J].中国实验诊断学,2016,20(6):1021-1022.
[4]王娴默,肖林,李彦林,等.不同采血方法对血常规检验的结果影响分析[J].检验医学与临床,2017,14(Z1):10-12.
[5]谢招香.探讨在血常规检验中运用不同采血方法对于检验结果的影响[J].中国继续医学教育,2015,7(3):167-168.
[6]周立强.两种采血方法在血常规检验中的应用效果分析[J].北方药学,2014,11(2):134-134.
[7]易伶俐.末梢血与静脉血采血方法进行血常规检验在临床中的应用价值分析[J].医学信息,2015,28(38):395.
[8]朱大峰.在血常规检验中应用不同采血方法的临床体会[J].临床研究,2017,25(10):183-184.
[9]亓慧敏,王雷.不同采血方法进行血常规检验在临床应用价值分析[J].医学检验与临床,2018,29(1):52-53,41.
[10]漆晓君.不同采血方法用于血常规检验的效果分析[J].世界临床医学,2017,11(4):234.

相似文献/References:

[1]姚 丽,石 蕾,欧阳华,等.真空负压穿刺在急危重症患者留置针穿刺中的应用效果[J].医学信息,2020,33(22):183.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.22.054]
　YAO Li,SHI Lei,OUYANG Hua,et al.Application Effect of Vacuum Negative Pressure Puncture in Indwelling Needle Puncture in Critically Ill Patients[J].Journal of Medical Information,2020,33(07):183.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.22.054]

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-04-01