[1]冯 洁,潘存伟,段杨丽,等.AIMS65评分在急性上消化道出血患者危险分级及预后评估中的作用[J].医学信息,2021,34(02):90-94.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.02.024]
　FENG Jie,PAN Cun-wei,DUAN Yang-li,et al.Role of AIMS65 Score in the Risk Classification and Prognosis Evaluation of Patients with Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding[J].Medical Information,2021,34(02):90-94.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.02.024]
点击复制

AIMS65评分在急性上消化道出血患者危险分级及预后评估中的作用()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
34卷
期数:
2021年02期
页码:
90-94
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2021-01-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Role of AIMS65 Score in the Risk Classification and Prognosis Evaluation of Patients with Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
文章编号:
1006-1959（2021）02-0090-05
作者:
冯 洁; 潘存伟; 段杨丽; 等
（桂林市人民医院消化内科1，风湿免疫科2，广西 桂林 541002）
Author(s):
FENG Jie; PAN Cun-wei; DUAN Yang-li; et al.
(Department of Gastroenterology1,Department of Rheumatology and Immunology2,GuilinPeople’s Hospital, Guilin 541002,Guangxi,China)
关键词:
AIMS65评分; Glasgow-Blatchford评分; 急性上消化道出血; 危险分级; 预后评估
Keywords:
AIMS65 score; Glasgow-Blatchford score; Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding; Risk classification; Prognostic evaluation
分类号:
R57
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.02.024
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 研究AIMS65评分在急性上消化道出血患者危险分级及预后评估中的作用。方法 选取我院2017年5月~2018年5月收治的急性上消化道出血患者100例，根据病情将患者分为高危组56例和低危组44例，比较两组性别、年龄、症状、生命体征、实验室检查、上消化道出血原因、治疗、预后、AIMS65评分及Glasgow-Blatchford评分，以AIM评分为金标准，绘制ROC曲线，观察AIMS65评分及Glasgow-Blatchford评分预测患者危险分级、院内死亡、再次出血的价值。结果 两组年龄、黑便、晕厥、SPB、ALB、RBC、再出血、输血、AIMS65评分和Glasgow-Blatchford评分比较，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；ROC曲线显示，AIMS65评分评估患者危险分级的曲线下面积（AUC）小于Glasgow-Blatchford评分，但差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；Glasgow-Blatchford评分评估患者院内死亡和再次出血的AUC小于AIMS65评分，但差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论 AIMS65评分Glasgow-Blatchford评分均可用于急性上消化道出血患者危险分级、院内死亡、再次出血的预测，且AIMS65评分简便、准确，值得临床应用。
Abstract:
Objective To study the role of AIMS65 score in the risk classification and prognosis evaluation of patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.Methods A total of 100 patients with acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage admitted to our hospital from May 2017 to May 2018 were selected. The patients were divided into a high-risk group of 56 cases and a low-risk group of 44 cases according to their condition. The two groups were compared by gender, age, symptoms, and symptoms. Vital signs, laboratory tests, causes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, treatment, prognosis, AIMS65 score and Glasgow-Blatchford score,using AIM score as the gold standard, draw ROC curve, observe the value of AIMS65 score and Glasgow-Blatchford score to predict patient risk classification, hospital death, and rebleeding.Results The two groups of age, melena, syncope, SPB, ALB, RBC, rebleeding, blood transfusion, AIMS65 score and Glasgow-Blatchford score, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05);The ROC curve showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of the AIMS65 score to assess the risk classification of patients was smaller than the Glasgow-Blatchford score, but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05);The Glasgow-Blatchford score evaluated the AUC of hospital death and rebleeding of patients less than the AIMS65 score, but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05).Conclusion The AIMS65 score Glasgow-Blatchford score can be used for the risk classification of patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, the prediction of hospital death, and rebleeding. The AIMS65 score is simple and accurate, and is worthy of clinical application.

参考文献/References:

[1]张一杰,王真. AIMS65评分在急性上消化道出血中的应用及预后评估价值[J].中国急救医学,2017,37(10):932-934. [2]李嘉嫦,吕菁君,姜洁,等.不同内镜前评分方法对危险性急性上消化道出血的预后评估价值[J].中国急救医学,2019,39(2):124-129. [3]季成菊,马臻棋.Blatchford、Rockall和AIMS65评分系统预测老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道出血预后的研究进展[J].国际消化病杂志,2017,37(5):303-305. [4]王世鑫.上消化道出血的诊断标准与治疗方案[J].中国临床医生,1999,27(9):23-24. [5]John RS,Ying PT,Brian HH,et al.A simple risk score accurately predicts in-hospital mortality,length of stay,and cost in acute upper GI bleeding[J].Gastrointestinal Endoscopy,2011,74(6):1215-1224. [6]刘会领,罗雁,李长平,等.Blatchford和AIMS65评分系统在急性上消化道出血诊治中的价值[J].天津医药,2017,45(4):423-427. [7]陈志彪,高春雷.不同评分系统评估上消化道出血患者危险分层的价值比较[J].现代仪器与医疗,2018,24(5):60-62. [8]Wedi E,Fischer A,Hochberger J,et al.Multicenter evaluation of first-line endoscopictreatmentwith theOTSC in acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinalbleeding and comparison with the Rockall cohort:the FLETRock study[J].Surgical Endoscopy,2018,32(1):307-314. [9]董桂君,巨森,赵平,等.急性非静脉曲张性上消化道出血死亡相关危险因素分析及不同评分系统对其死亡风险的预测价值[J].胃肠病学和肝病学杂志,2019,28(7):755-760. [10]聂琳,章礼久.AIMS65与Blatchford评分系统在非静脉曲张性上消化道出血中的应用比较[J].安徽医学,2018,39(3):86-89. [11]Masayasu H,Yuki O,Juntaro M,et al.Absence of high-risk stigmata predicts good prognosis even in severely anemic patients with suspected acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding[J].United European Gastroenterology Journal,2018,6(5):684-690. [12]张洪斌.AIMS65 Blatchford及Rockall评分系统指标联合对消化道出血后再出血的预测价值[J].中国实用内科杂志,2018,38(S1):27-29,32. [13]Wang XY,Chen XY.Significance of AIMS65 risk scoring system in evaluating prognosis of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding[J].World Chinese Journal of Digestology,2016,24(28):4013-4018. [14]庞艳华,杜丽川,郝建宇,等.急性非静脉曲张性上消化道出血内镜下诊治分析及Glasgow-Blatchford评分系统在急诊内镜检查前的预判作用[J].中国急救医学,2018,38(9):810-813. [15]曾春兰,张红.基于Glasgow-Blatchford评分的分级护理在肝硬化急性上消化道出血患者中的应用效果[J].广西医学,2018,40(8):989-991. [16]July J,Wahjoepramono EJ.Surgical Approaches for Neurovascular Diseases)Vasospasm Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage[J].Neurovascular Surgery,2019,10(29):249-254. [17]付莉霞.基于Rockall评分的护理流程优化用于急性非静脉曲张上消化道出血的临床效果[J].现代消化及介入诊疗,2017,22(3):440-442. [18]陈剑,唐帅,唐小华.AIMS65评分在急性上消化道出血患者危险分级及预后评估中的作用[J].临床急诊杂志,2015,16(10):760-763.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01