[1]李 爱.临床路径护理干预在经尿道前列腺等离子体双极电切术治疗前列腺增生中的应用效果[J].医学信息,2022,35(06):186-189.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.06.050]
　LI Ai.Application Effect of Clinical Pathway Nursing Intervention in Transurethral Bipolar Plasma Kinetic Prostatectomy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia[J].Medical Information,2022,35(06):186-189.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.06.050]
点击复制

临床路径护理干预在经尿道前列腺等离子体双极电切术治疗前列腺增生中的应用效果()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2022年06期
页码:
186-189
栏目:
护理研究
出版日期:
2022-03-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application Effect of Clinical Pathway Nursing Intervention in Transurethral Bipolar Plasma Kinetic Prostatectomy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
文章编号:
1006-1959（2022）06-0186-04
作者:
李 爱
（南京市江宁医院泌尿外科，江苏 南京 211100）
Author(s):
LI Ai
(Department of Urology Surgery,Nanjing Jiangning Hospital,Nanjing 211100,Jiangsu,China)
关键词:
临床路径护理; 经尿道前列腺等离子体双极电切术; 前列腺增生; 尿动力学
Keywords:
Clinical pathway nursing; Transurethral bipolar plasma kinetic prostatectomy; Prostatic hyperplasia; Urodynamics
分类号:
R473.6
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.06.050
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨临床路径护理干预在经尿道前列腺等离子体双极电切术（TUPKP）治疗前列腺增生中的应用效果。方法 选取2018年7月-2020年7月我院诊治的100例TUPKP治疗的前列腺增生患者为研究对象，按照随机数字表法分为对照组51例和观察组49例。对照组采用常规护理干预，观察组采用临床路径护理干预，比较两组手术指标、前列腺症状评分、生活质量评分、尿动力学指标[最大尿流率（Qmax）、最大尿意膀胱容量（VMCC）、残余尿量（PVR）]、并发症发生率以及护理满意度。结果 观察组术后首次排气时间、血尿持续时间、膀胱痉挛发生的次数、疼痛评分、膀胱冲洗时间、留置导尿管时间、住院时间均优于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；观察组前列腺症状评分低于对照组，生活质量评分高于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；观察组Qmax、VMCC高于对照组，PVR低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；观察组并发症总发生率为6.12%，低于对照组的15.69%，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；观察组护理满意度为97.96%，高于对照组的88.24%，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 临床路径护理干预可提高TUPKP治疗的前列腺增生患者生活质量，降低前列腺症状评分，缩短术后恢复和治疗时间，改善尿动力学指标，降低并发症发生率，且护理满意度较高。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the application effect of clinical pathway nursing intervention in transurethral bipolar plasma kinetic prostatectomy (TUPKP) in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.Methods A total of 100 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia treated with TUPKP in our hospital from July 2018 to July 2020 were selected and randomly divided into control group (51 cases) and observation group (49 cases). The control group was treated with routine nursing intervention, and the observation group was treated with clinical pathway nursing intervention. The operation indexes, prostate symptom score, quality of life score, urodynamics index[maximum flow rate (Qmax), maximum urinary bladder volume (VMCC), post-void residual urine volume (PVR)], incidence of complications and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups.Results The first postoperative exhaust time, hematuria duration, frequency of bladder spasm, pain score, bladder irrigation time, indwelling catheter time and hospitalization time in the observation group were better than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The prostate symptom score in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the quality of life score in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, with significant difference (P<0.05). Qmax and VMCC in the observation group were higher than those in the control group, and PVR was lower than that in the control group, with significant difference (P<0.05). The total incidence of complications in the observation group was 6.12%, which was lower than 15.69% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The nursing satisfaction of the observation group was 97.96%, which was higher than 88.24% of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion Clinical pathway nursing intervention can improve the quality of life of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia treated with TUPKP, reduce prostate symptom score, shorten postoperative recovery and treatment course, improve urodynamic indexes, reduce the incidence of complications, and have higher nursing satisfaction.

参考文献/References:

[1]杨高第,付宝琛.经尿道前列腺电切术与等离子双极电切术治疗良性前列腺增生的疗效比较[J].实用医药杂志,2020,37(12):1097-1099.[2]Johnsen NV,Kammann TJ,Marien T,et al.Comparison of Holmium Laser Prostate Enucleation Outcomes in Patients with or without Preoperative Urinary Retention[J].Journal of Urology,2016,195(4 Part 1):1021-1026.[3]任春霞.TURP围手术期患者专用图文式临床路径的应用探讨[J].实用心脑肺血管病杂志,2016(24):47-49.[4]许鹏,彭谋,粘烨琦,等.160W高功率直出绿激光汽化术与等离子双极电切术治疗高龄高危良性前列腺增生疗效比较[J].中国医师杂志,2018(8):1228-1230.[5]方朕.临床路径管理模式在医院管理中的应用现状分析[J].中国医药导报,2017,14(10):166-169.[6]那彦群.中国泌尿外科疾病诊断治疗指南:2007版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2007.[7]黄梅,杨俊.快速康复外科理念联合心理护理在泌尿外科手术患者围手术期护理中的应用效果[J].医学理论与实践,2018,31(21):3301-3302.[8]马学砚,安爱荣,李桂琴.不同温度冲洗液对前列腺电切术后并发症的影响[J].河北医学,2016,22(1):150-153.[9]李爽.老年前列腺电切手术病人术中低体温护理干预效果的临床评价[D].长春:吉林大学,2015.[10]李季鸥,钮敏红,龚喜雪.高危前列腺增生经尿道前列腺电切术临床护理路径建立及应用[J].全科护理,2014,12(22):2084-2085.[11]龚天菊.微创汽化电切术治疗前列腺增生护理观察[J].深圳中西医结合杂志,2016,26(19):168-169.[12]杨华,贾洪涛,王秀新,等.经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切与前列腺电切治疗前列腺增生症的对比研究[J].湖北医药学院学报,2017(3):61-63,76.[13]单勇,徐汉军,刘仁杰,等.TUPKP和TURP治疗良性前列腺增生患者临床效果的对比观察[J].现代医学,2020,48(12):1598-1601.[14]谢丽娟.护理干预在经尿道前列腺电切术治疗前列腺增生症的临床价值[J].检验医学与临床,2016,13(3):360-362.[15]范亚莉,李初,牛永萍.临床护理路径对经尿道电切术治疗浅表性膀胱癌的疗效及生活质量的影响[J].中国煤炭工业医学杂志,2016,19(5):776-779.[16]谢秀艳.前列腺增生症临床路径变异疾病因素分析与护理对策[J].护理学杂志,2014,29(22):29-30.[17]王雪华,黄敬喻,王跃强,等.临床护理路径在良性前列腺增生患者围手术期中应用研究[J].中国卫生标准管理,2018,9(1):137-138.[18]彭艳.试论临床护理路径在前列腺增生症手术患者中应用[J].医学信息,2015,28(1):150.[19]王花.临床护理路径干预对经尿道前列腺电切术患者生活质量及术后并发症的影响[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2016,25(30):3409-3411.

相似文献/References:

[1]李玲慧.临床路径护理干预对PCI术后患者心功能恢复及预后的影响[J].医学信息,2019,32(20):185.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.20.060]
　LI Ling-hui.Effect of Clinical Pathway Nursing Intervention on Cardiac Function Recovery and Prognosis in Patients after PCI[J].Medical Information,2019,32(06):185.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.20.060]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01