[1]开塞尔·艾合买提江,米那瓦尔·阿力木,赵文静,等.骨性Ⅱ类不同垂直骨面型患者蝶鞍的差异性研究[J].医学信息,2023,36(05):81-84.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.05.015]
　Kaisaier·Aihemaitijiang,Minawaer·Alimu,ZHAO Wen-jing,et al.Comparative Evaluation of Sella Turcica in Patients with Skeletal Class Ⅱ Malocclusion with Different Vertical Growth Patterns[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(05):81-84.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.05.015]
点击复制

骨性Ⅱ类不同垂直骨面型患者蝶鞍的差异性研究()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
36卷
期数:
2023年05期
页码:
81-84
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2023-03-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparative Evaluation of Sella Turcica in Patients with Skeletal Class Ⅱ Malocclusion with Different Vertical Growth Patterns
文章编号:
1006-1959（2023）05-0081-04
作者:
开塞尔·艾合买提江; 米那瓦尔·阿力木; 赵文静; 等
（新疆医科大学第二附属医院口腔科，新疆 乌鲁木齐 830092）
Author(s):
Kaisaier·Aihemaitijiang; Minawaer·Alimu; ZHAO Wen-jing; et al.
(Department of Stomatology,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University,Urumqi 830092,Xinjiang,China)
关键词:
骨性Ⅱ类; 不同垂直骨面型; 蝶鞍; 鞍桥
Keywords:
Skeletal class Ⅱ; Different vertical growth patterns; Sella turcica; Sella turcica bridging
分类号:
R782.6
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.05.015
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探究骨性Ⅱ类不同垂直骨面型与蝶鞍大小、形态及鞍桥发生的相关性。方法 选取2010年1月-2022年4月就诊于新疆医科大学第二附属医院及新疆医科大学第五附属医院口腔科的骨性Ⅱ类患者118例。垂直骨面型划分按中国人正常牙合Steiner分析法测量均值划分为：高角组44例（GoGn-SN＞37.7°）、均角组44例（27.3°≤GoGn-SN≤37.7°）、低角组30例（GoGn-SN＜27.3°）。通过头颅侧位片观测三组蝶鞍大小、形态及鞍桥发生情况，并比较组间及性别间的差异。结果 三组患者蝶鞍直径、深度、长度测量参数进行比较，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；高角组患者不同性别蝶鞍直径及低角组患者性别间蝶鞍长度比较，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；均角组不同性别蝶鞍形态比较，差异有统计学差异（P＜0.05）；高角组不同性别蝶鞍长度及深度，均角组不同性别蝶鞍长度、深度及直径，低角组不同性别蝶鞍深度及直径分别比较，差异有统计学差异（P＜0.05）；高角组及低角组不同性别蝶鞍形态，三组患者蝶鞍形态、蝶鞍鞍桥发生率，以及三组不同性别蝶鞍鞍桥发生率比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论 垂直骨面型与蝶鞍大小存在关联，垂直骨面型与蝶鞍形态以及蝶鞍鞍桥无关联，可为口腔正畸诊断及治疗提供临床参考。
Abstract:
Objective To compare the size, shape and incidence of sella turcica bridging in patients with different vertical growth patterns in skeletal class Ⅱ malocclusion.Methods A total of 118 patients with skeletal class Ⅱ malocclusion were selected from the Department of Stomatology of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University and the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from January 2010 to April 2022. According to the mean value of Steiner analysis of Chinese normal occlusion, 44 cases were divided into high angle group (GoGn-SN>37.7°), 44 cases were divided into average angle group (27.3°≤GoGn-SN≤37.7°), 30 cases were divided into low angle group (GoGn-SN<27.3°). The size, shape and saddle bridge of the three groups were observed by lateral cephalogram, and the differences between groups and genders were compared.Results There were significant differences in the measurement parameters of sella diameter, depth and length among the three groups (P<0.05). There were significant differences in sella diameter between different genders in the high angle group and sella length between different genders in the low angle group (P<0.05). There was significant difference in sella morphology between different genders in the average angle group (P<0.05). There were significant differences in the length and depth of sella between different genders in the high angle group, the length, depth and diameter of sella in different genders in the average angle group, and the depth and diameter of sella in different genders in the low angle group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the sella morphology of different genders in the high angle group and the low angle group, the sella morphology and the incidence of sella bridge in the three groups, and the incidence of sella bridge in the three groups (P>0.05).Conclusion There is a correlation between the vertical facial type and the size of the sella, and there is no correlation between the vertical facial type and the shape of the sella and the sella bridge, which can provide clinical reference for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment.

参考文献/References:

[1]Canigur BN,Arslan AB.Morphometric evaluation of cranial base and sella turcica in patients with bilateral agenesis of maxillary lateral incisors[J].Odontology,2021,109(3):701-709.[2]Lee J,Kulubya E,Pressman BD,et al.Sellar and clival plasmacytomas: case series of 5 patients with systematic review of 65 published cases[J].Pituitary,2017,20(3):381-392.[3]Silveira BT,Fernandes KS,Trivino T,et al.Assessment of the relationship between size, shape and volume of the sella turcica in class Ⅱ and Ⅲ patients prior to orthognathic surgery[J].Surg Radiol Anat,2020,42(5):577-582.[4]Gordon MB,Bell AL.A rentgeographic study of the sella turcica in normal children[J].Endocrinology,1923,7(1):52-56.[5]Haji Ghadimi M,Amini F,Hamedi S,et al.Associations among sella turcica bridging, atlas arcuate foramen (ponticulus posticus) development, atlas posterior arch deficiency, and the occurrence of palatally displaced canine impaction[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2017,151(3):513-520.[6]Ali B,Shaikh A,Fida M.Association between sella turcica bridging and palatal canine impaction[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2014,146(4):437-441.[7]Dadgar S,Alimohamadi M,Rajabi N,et al.Associations among palatal impaction of canine, sella turcica bridging, and ponticulus posticus (atlas arcuate foramen)[J].Surg Radiol Anat,2021,43(1):93-99.[8]Peroviｃ T,Blaｚej Z,Jovanoviｃ I,et al.Morphometric analysis of the sella turcica in subjects with different vertical growth patterns-a cephalometric study[J].Homo,2021,72(3):215-227.[9]Sobuti F,Dadgar S,Seifi A,et al.Relationship between bridging and dimensions of sella turcica with classification of craniofacial skeleton[J].Pol J Radiol,2018,83(undefined),e120-e126.[10]Shrestha GK,Pokharel PR,Gyawali R,et al.The morphology and bridging of the sella turcica in adult orthodontic patients[J].BMC Oral Health,2018,18(1):45.[11]Al-Mohana RAAM,Muhammed FK,Li X,et al.The bridging and normal dimensions of sella turcica in Yemeni individuals[J].Oral Radiol,2022,38(1):162-170.[12]Afzal E,Fida M.Associationbetween variations in sella turcica dimensions and morphology and skeletal malocclusions[J].Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad,2019,31(2):172-177.[13]Magat G,Ozcan SS.Morphometric analysis of the sella turcica in Turkish individuals with different dentofacial skeletal patterns[J].Folia Morphol (Warsz),2018,77(3):543-550.[14]边慧慧,郑颖,安娜,等.蝶鞍的线性测量和形态分析[J].口腔医学,2017,37(4):341-345.[15]李铎,郑博文,刘奕.唇腭裂畸形患者蝶鞍鞍桥发生的研究[J].中华口腔正畸学杂志,2018,25(4):196-200.[16]Chou ST,Chen CM,Chen PH,et al.Morphology of sella turcica and bridging prevalence correlated with sex and craniofacial skeletal pattern in eastern asia population: CBCT study[J].Biomed Res Int,2021,2021:6646406.[17]斯贝尔,陈澜月,陈艳娜,等.牙齿异位与鞍桥之间的关系[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2017,33(2):95-97,98.[18]Motwani MB,Biranjan R,Dhole A,et al.A study to evaluate the shape and size of sella turcica and its correlation with the type of malocclusion on lateral cephalometric radiographs[J].IOSR J Dent Med Sci,2017,16(6):126-132.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01