[1]胡江波,陈姣姣,苏彩霞,等.经颅直流电刺激联合镜像疗法对脑卒中后非流利性失语患者的疗效观察[J].医学信息,2023,36(06):81-84.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.06.017]
 HU Jiang-bo,CHEN Jiao-jiao,SU Cai-xia,et al.Observation on the Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined with Mirror Therapy on Patients with Nonfluent Aphasia Output After Stroke[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(06):81-84.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.06.017]
点击复制

经颅直流电刺激联合镜像疗法对脑卒中后非流利性失语患者的疗效观察()
分享到:

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
36卷
期数:
2023年06期
页码:
81-84
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2023-03-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Observation on the Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined with Mirror Therapy on Patients with Nonfluent Aphasia Output After Stroke
文章编号:
1006-1959(2023)06-0081-04
作者:
胡江波陈姣姣苏彩霞
(1.徐州市中心医院康复科,江苏 徐州 221000;2.徐州市康复医院,江苏 徐州 221000)
Author(s):
HU Jiang-boCHEN Jiao-jiaoSU Cai-xiaet al.
(1.Department of Rehabilitation,Xuzhou Central Hospital,Xuzhou 221000,Jiangsu,China;2.Xuzhou Rehabilitation Hospital,Xuzhou 221000,Jiangsu,China)
关键词:
经颅直流电刺激镜像疗法脑卒中非流利性失语
Keywords:
Transcranial direct current stimulationMirror therapyStrokeNonfluent aphasia output
分类号:
R743.3
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.06.017
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 观察经颅直流电刺激联合镜像疗法对脑卒中后非流利性失语患者的疗效。方法 选取2019年10月-2021年12月在徐州市中心医院诊治的62例脑卒中后非流利性失语患者为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,各31例。对照组常规治疗加经颅直流电刺激,观察组在对照组基础上给予镜像疗法治疗。比较两组治疗前和治疗4周时的临床疗效、言语功能评分、失语指数、交流能力评分、失语症分级及事件相关脑电位N400。结果 观察组总有效率为93.55%,高于对照组的80.65%(P<0.05);两组治疗后自发言语、理解、复述、命名各维度评分均高于治疗前,且观察组高于对照组(P<0.05);两组失语指数、交流能力评分均高于治疗前,且观察组高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组失语症5级、4级所占比例均大于对照组,2级、1级所占比例均小于对照组(P<0.05),3级与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组治疗后N400潜伏期小于对照组,波幅大于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 经颅直流电刺激联合镜像疗法治疗脑卒中后非流利性失语效果确切,可提高治疗总有效率,显著提升患者言语功能、交流能力、认知功能评分,改善失语症程度分级和N400,具有重要的临床应用价值。
Abstract:
Objective To observe the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with mirror therapy on patients with nonfluent aphasia output after stroke.Methods A total of 62 patients with nonfluent aphasia output after stroke who were treated in Xuzhou Central Hospital from October 2019 to December 2021 were selected as the research objects. They were divided into control group and observation group by random number table method, with 31 cases in each group. The control group received routine treatment plus transcranial direct current stimulation, and the observation group received mirror therapy on the basis of the control group. The clinical efficacy, speech function score, aphasia index, communication ability score, aphasia grading and event-related brain potential N400 were compared between the two groups before and 4 weeks after treatment.Results The total effective rate of the observation group was 93.55%, which was higher than 80.65% of the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, the scores of spontaneous speech, understanding, retelling and naming in the two groups were higher than those before treatment, and those in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). The aphasia index and communication ability scores of the two groups were higher than those before treatment, and those in the observation group was higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). The proportion of aphasia grade 5 and grade 4 in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, and the proportion of grade 2 and grade 1 was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the proportion of grade 3 between observation group and control group (P>0.05). After treatment, the latency of N400 in the observation group was less than that in the control group, and the amplitude was greater than that in the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion Transcranial direct current stimulation combined with mirror therapy is effective in the treatment of patients with nonfluent aphasia output after stroke, which can improve the total effective rate of treatment, improve the scores of speech function, communication ability and cognitive function, and improve the degree of aphasia and N400. It has important clinical application value.

参考文献/References:

[1]戈蕾,赵玉晓,常永霞,等.低频重复经颅磁刺激联合依达拉奉对脑梗死失语患者炎性因子及脑代谢产物的影响[J].海南医学院学报,2017,23(5):694-697.[2]沈开慧,梅笑寒,杜文娟,等.超低频经颅磁刺激结合康复训练治疗对脑瘫患儿运动功能和语言功能的影响[J].中国妇幼保健,2018,33(15):3475-3478.[3]张怡,恽文伟,张敏,等.低频重复经颅磁刺激联合高压氧治卒中后非流利性失语的疗效观察[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2019,41(7):512-516.[4]Cordella C,Quimby M,Touroutoglou A,et al.Quantification of motor speech impairment and its anatomic basis in primary progressive aphasia[J].Neurology,2019,92(17):e1992-e2004.[5]段小东,胥方元,胥泽华,等.高压氧联合重复经颅磁刺激治疗脑梗死患者认知功能的疗效观察[J].中国康复医学杂志,2018,33(10):1168-1172.[6]常利.低频重复经颅磁刺激治疗急性脑梗死后运动性失语的临床观察[J].神经损伤与功能重建,2018,13(1):53-54.[7]由丽,王珧,田丽,等.基于镜像神经元理论的动作观察疗法对脑卒中后言语失用的疗效观察[J].临床神经病学杂志,2018,31(6):429-432.[8]中华医学会神经病学分会,中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组.中国急性缺血性脑卒中诊治指南2018[J].中华神经科杂志,2018,51(9):666-682.[9]闫芳,臧卫周,张杰文,等.双侧rTMS治疗脑梗死后失语症的临床研究[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志,2018,21(2):129-132.[10]曹晓敏.重复经颅磁刺激对卒中后非流利性失语的治疗效果及认知功能恢复情况的研究[D].广州:南方医科大学,2018.[11]张莉,沈莉.经颅直流电刺激联合记忆强化训练治疗缺血性脑卒中后失语症患者的临床效果[J].实用心脑肺血管病杂志,2020,28(1):117-120.[12]凌水桥,黄晓煌,罗卫欢.左Broca区和外侧裂后部经颅直流电刺激对脑卒中后运动性失语的疗效分析[J].中国处方药,2019,17(8):131-133.[13]张大华,汪洁,卢洁,等.非侵入性脑刺激技术对复述功能正常的卒中后非流利性失语症患者视图命名能力的疗效对比分析[J].中国脑血管病杂志,2021,18(2):84-90.[14]李学敏,陈文文,金维,等.经颅直流电刺激联合认知功能训练治疗缺血性脑卒中后失语症临床效果观察[J].临床误诊误治,2019,32(8):80-85.[15]张洪,杨琪,刘静,等.经颅直流电联合持续θ短阵快速脉冲刺激语言双模通路治疗脑卒中后非流畅性失语症的疗效观察[J].中华神经创伤外科电子杂志,2020,6(5):287-291.[16]Meinzer M,Darkow R,Lindenberg R,et al.Electrical stimulation of the motor cortex enhances treat- ment outcome in post-stroke aphasia[J].Brain,2016,139(4):1152-1163.[17]王彦青,肖小华.经颅直流电刺激联合常规康复治疗在脑卒中偏瘫上肢运动功能和失语症康复中的作用分析[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2018,39(5):510-511.[18]方翠霓,方碧兰,刘佳,等.经颅直流电刺激对脑卒中后语言功能障碍的疗效观察[J].中国基层医药,2017,24(17):2603-2606.[19]张洪,刘静,杨未风,等.经颅直流电刺激联合常规言语康复治疗脑卒中后非流畅性失语症的疗效观察[J].康复学报,2017,27(3):39-42.[20]张雅妮,刘爱玲,练涛.经颅直流电刺激在脑卒中后失语症康复中的应用[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2018,16(3):308-310.[21]张芹,江钟立,方欣,等.词联导航训练法联合经颅直流电刺激改善失语症言语流畅度及命名能力的临床观察[J].中国康复医学杂志,2017,32(8):879-884.

相似文献/References:

[1]张 磊,张巧俊,惠艳娉.经颅直流电刺激调控帕金森病抑郁相关的脑环路及机制[J].医学信息,2022,35(21):159.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.21.043]
 ZHANG Lei,ZHANG Qiao-jun,HUI Yan-ping.Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Regulates Depression-related Brain Circuits and Mechanism in Parkinson’s Disease[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(06):159.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.21.043]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01