[1]丁辉耀,余小勇,樊建平,等.关节镜下治疗外侧半月板撕裂合并不同程度软骨损伤的疗效研究[J].医学信息,2023,36(10):172-175.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.10.039]
　DING Hui-yao,YU Xiao-yong,FAN Jian-ping,et al.Study on the Curative Effect of Arthroscopic Treatment of Lateral Meniscus Tear Combined with Different Degrees of Cartilage Injury[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(10):172-175.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.10.039]
点击复制

关节镜下治疗外侧半月板撕裂合并不同程度软骨损伤的疗效研究()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
36卷
期数:
2023年10期
页码:
172-175
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2023-05-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on the Curative Effect of Arthroscopic Treatment of Lateral Meniscus Tear Combined with Different Degrees of Cartilage Injury
文章编号:
1006-1959（2023）10-0172-04
作者:
丁辉耀; 余小勇; 樊建平; 等
（修水县第一人民医院骨科，江西 修水 332400）
Author(s):
DING Hui-yao; YU Xiao-yong; FAN Jian-ping; et al.
(Department of Orthopedics,First People’s Hospital of Xiushui County,Xiushui 332400,Jiangxi,China)
关键词:
外侧半月板撕裂; 软骨损伤; 关节镜; 半月板切除术; 膝关节
Keywords:
Lateral meniscus tear; Cartilage injury; Arthroscopy; Meniscectomy; Knee joint
分类号:
R687.4
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.10.039
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 研究关节镜下治疗外侧半月板撕裂合并不同程度软骨损伤的疗效。方法 选取2016年6月-2021年6月修水县第一人民医院收治的82例外侧半月板撕裂并软骨损伤患者，依据软骨损伤Outerbridge分级进行分组，OuterbridgeⅠ~Ⅱ级设为A组，OuterbridgeⅢ~Ⅳ级设为B组，均为41例。所有患者均给予关节镜下治疗，比较两组临床疗效、Lysholm膝关节评分、Tegner活动水平量表评分、疼痛症状[静态、动态疼痛视觉模拟评分（VAS）]、术后恢复时间（膝关节活动度恢复正常时间、活动后无疼痛时间）。结果 A组治疗有效率高于B组（P＜0.05）；术后3个月，两组Lysholm、Tegner评分均高于术前，且A组低于B组（P＜0.05）；术后3个月，两组静、动态VAS评分均低于术前，且A组低于B组（P＜0.05）；A组膝关节活动度恢复正常时间、活动后无疼痛时间均短于B组（P＜0.05）。结论 关节镜下治疗外侧半月板撕裂并不同程度软骨损伤的疗效存在明显差异，其中OuterbridgeⅠ~Ⅱ级软骨损伤患者的治疗效果优于OuterbridgeⅢ~Ⅳ级软骨损伤患者，且膝关节功能及疼痛症状改善更为明显，术后恢复更快。
Abstract:
Objective To study the effect of arthroscopic treatment of lateral meniscus tear with different degrees of cartilage injury.Methods A total of 82 patients with lateral meniscus tear and cartilage injury admitted to the First People’s Hospital of Xiushui County from June 2016 to June 2021 were selected and grouped according to the Outerbridge classification of cartilage injury. Outerbridge grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ was set as group A, and Outerbridge grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ was set as group B, with 41 patients in each group. All patients were given arthroscopic treatment. The clinical efficacy, Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity level scale score, pain symptoms [static and dynamic pain visual analogue score (VAS)], postoperative recovery time (knee activity recovery time, no pain time after activity) were compared between the two groups.Results The effective rate of treatment in group A was higher than that in group B (P<0.05). At 3 months after operation, Lysholm and Tegner scores of the two groups were higher than those before operation, and those in group A were lower than those in group B (P<0.05). At 3 months after operation, the static and dynamic VAS scores of the two groups were lower than those before operation, and those in group A were lower than those in group B (P<0.05). The recovery time of knee joint activity and pain-free time after activity in group A were shorter than those in group B (P<0.05).Conclusion There are significant differences in the efficacy of arthroscopic treatment of lateral meniscus tear and different degrees of cartilage injury. The therapeutic effect of patients with Outerbridge grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ cartilage injury is better than that of patients with Outerbridge grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ cartilage injury, and the improvement of knee joint function and pain symptoms is more obvious, and the postoperative recovery is faster.

参考文献/References:

[1]郑佳鹏,肖棋,邓辉云,等.外侧半月板腘肌腱区损伤的关节镜下分型和处理[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2021,53(5):891-895.[2]Lee CR,Bin SI,Kim JM,et al.Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in young patients with symptomatic discoid lateral meniscus: an average 10-year follow-up study[J].Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery,2017,138(3):369-376.[3]赵敏,刘鸿雁,王国华,等.膝关节骨关节炎半月板损伤程度与关节软骨T1 rho、T2 mapping相关性研究[J].中国临床医学影像杂志,2019,30(11):812-816.[4]胡瑛.关节镜下半月板成形术对膝关节半月板损伤患者膝关节功能的改善作用[J].中国药物与临床,2021,21(8):1332-1334.[5]Pakuts A,Martin L,Contador J.Natural History of Symptomatic Meniscal Tears: Arthroscopic Evaluation of Chondral Damage at 4-Year Minimum[J].Open Journal of Orthopaedic,2019,9(11):231-240.[6]Ozeki N,Seil R,Krych AJ,et al.Surgical treatment of complex meniscus tear and disease: state of the art[J].J ISAKOS,2021,6(1):35-45.[7]代朋乙,张智敏.膝关节镜下半月板成形联合钢丝引导缝合治疗外侧盘状半月板损伤的临床疗效观察[J].中国医刊,2019,37(7):735-738.[8]周钢,葛兴涛,林坚平,等.关节镜下Fast-Fix联合微骨折术修复水平状半月板撕裂的临床研究[J].重庆医学,2019,48(12):2027-2030.[9]钱雄,郑龙坡.关节镜下半月板切除术与成形缝合术治疗盘状半月板损伤的临床对比研究[J].创伤外科杂志,2017,19(7):539-541.[10]陈雍华,杨阳,陈曲.关节镜治疗膝关节半月板损伤的临床研究[J].局解手术学杂志,2019,28(4):329-331.[11]房丽,张伟滨,何会超,等.关节镜下缝合修复3度半月板损伤的效果及对膝关节本体感觉的影响[J].中国医药导报,2019,16(6):66-69.[12]杨顺杰,李箭,薛扬,等.影响症状性外侧盘状半月板术后疗效的相关危险因素分析[J].中国骨伤,2021,34(12):1114-1120.[13]麦剑军,徐斌,涂俊,等.关节镜下手术治疗膝关节盘状半月板损伤的有效性:单中心,自身对照[J].中国组织工程研究,2019,23(4):532-537.[14]Sullivan JK,Shrestha S,Collins JE,et al.Association between changes in muscle strength and pain in persons with meniscal tear and osteoarthritis[J].Osteoarthr Cartil Open,2020,2(3):100072.[15]陈同磊,周海龙,沈国强.关节镜下全内缝合治疗半月板水平撕裂的临床疗效[J].江苏医药,2018,44(1):109-111.[16]王刚涛,张卫东,张旭辉,等.关节镜下修复外侧半月板体部完全撕裂疗效观察[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2017,32(12):1304-1305.[17]刘昊,孙晓新,周伟,等.关节镜手术治疗成人外侧盘状半月板损伤的预后分析及影像学评价[J].中国煤炭工业医学杂志,2017,20(11):1318-1322.[18]白涛,王迎春,呼瑞,等.关节镜手术治疗膝关节半月板损伤的疗效及优点分析[J].西南国防医药,2018,28(2):165-167.[19]王凌,李雅欣,郭宇,等.关节镜手术治疗半月板撕裂后骨性关节炎的患病率及相关因素[J].现代医学,2019,47(5):547-551.[20]刘思亭.关节镜下治疗膝关节盘状半月板损伤的效果评估与研究[J].中国医药导刊,2017,19(7):693-694.[21]Lu J,Chen Y,Hu M,et al.Clinical efficacy of arthroscopy in the treatment of discoid meniscus injury and related risk factors for postoperative pain[J].Ann Palliat Med,2020,9(6):4002-4009.[22]Ahn JH,Kang DM,Choi KJ.Risk factors for radiographic progression of osteoarthritis after partial meniscectomy of discoid lateral meniscus tear[J].Orthop Traumatol Surg Res,2017,103(8):1183-1188.[23]谈绎文,郑昱新,顾新丰,等.关节镜治疗成人外侧盘状半月板的短期疗效及软骨损伤对疗效的影响[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2017,32(10):1079-1081.[24]Nakamae A,Adachi N,Ishikawa M,et al.Risk factors for progression of articular cartilage damage after anatomic ACL reconstruction in cases of normal meniscus[J].Asia-Pacific Journal of Sports Medicine,2017,9(7):69.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01