[1]林丽琼,肖莉莉,冯尔宥,等.二代测序技术在假体周围感染诊断中的应用[J].医学信息,2023,36(11):95-98.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.11.017]
　LIN Li-qiong,XIAO Li-li,FENG Er-you,et al.Application of Second-generation Sequencing Technology in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Infection[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(11):95-98.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.11.017]
点击复制

二代测序技术在假体周围感染诊断中的应用()

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
36卷
期数:
2023年11期
页码:
95-98
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2023-06-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application of Second-generation Sequencing Technology in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Infection
文章编号:
1006-1959（2023）11-0095-04
作者:
林丽琼; 肖莉莉; 冯尔宥; 等
（福州市第二医院骨科，福建 福州 350007）
Author(s):
LIN Li-qiong; XIAO Li-li; FENG Er-you; et al.
(Department of Orthopedics,Fuzhou Second Hospital,Fuzhou 350007,Fujian,China)
关键词:
假体周围感染; 生物标志物; 二代测序; 细菌培养
Keywords:
Periprosthetic joint infections; Biomarker; Second-generation sequencing; Bacterial culture
分类号:
R687.4
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.11.017
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 评估二代测序技术在假体周围感染病原菌诊断中的实用性和有效性。方法 选择2019年8月-2022年1月在我院骨科就诊且接受人工关节翻修手术患者46例，根据2018年国际共识会议（ICM）诊断标准分为无菌性松动组（21例）和假体周围感染组（25例）。比较术前血清白细胞（WBC）、C反应蛋白（CRP）、红细胞沉降率（ESR）和D二聚体，关节液白细胞计数（关节液WBC），关节液多核细胞计数（关节液PMN）；术中滑膜组织标本同时进行14 d传统细菌培养与二代测序，评价细菌培养、二代测序、细菌培养与二代测序联合诊断的诊断效能。结果 假体周围感染组WBC、CRP、ESR、Synovial WBC、Synovial PMN均高于无菌性松动组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；WBC、CRP、ESR、D-二聚体、关节液WBC和关节液PMN、细菌培养、二代测序、细菌培养与二代测序联合诊断的曲线下面积（AUC）分别为0.717、0.897、0.830、0.769、0.912、0.872、0.740、0.829和0.849。细菌培养与二代测序联合诊断效能优于二代测序，优于传统细菌培养，敏感性、准确度较高，假阴性率较低，但假阳性率较高。结论 二代测序技术作为一种新型诊断工具，较传统细菌培养更高的敏感性、准确度，为假体周围感染病原学诊断提供有力帮助。
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the practicability and effectiveness of second-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of pathogens in periprosthetic infection.Methods From August 2019 to January 2022, 46 patients who underwent artificial joint revision surgery in the Department of Orthopaedics of our hospital were selected. According to the diagnostic criteria of the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) in 2018, they were divided into aseptic loosening group (21 cases) and periprosthetic infection group (25 cases). Preoperative serum white blood cell (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and D-dimer, white blood cell count (WBC) and polynuclear cell count (PMN) in synovial fluid were compared. The synovial tissue samples were simultaneously subjected to 14 days of traditional bacterial culture and second-generation sequencing to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of bacterial culture, second-generation sequencing, and combined diagnosis of bacterial culture and second-generation sequencing.Results WBC, CRP, ESR, Synovial WBC and Synovial PMN in the periprosthetic infection group were higher than those in the aseptic loosening group (P<0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) of WBC, CRP, ESR, D-dimer, joint fluid WBC and joint fluid PMN, bacterial culture, second-generation sequencing, bacterial culture combined with second-generation sequencing were 0.717, 0.897, 0.830, 0.769, 0.912, 0.872, 0.740, 0.829 and 0.849, respectively. The diagnostic efficiency of bacterial culture combined with second-generation sequencing was better than that of second-generation sequencing, and better than that of traditional bacterial culture. The sensitivity and accuracy were higher, the false negative rate was lower, but the false positive rate was higher.Conclusion As a new diagnostic tool, the second generation sequencing technology has higher sensitivity and accuracy than traditional bacterial culture, which provides a powerful help for the etiological diagnosis of periprosthetic infection.

参考文献/References:

[1]Lin C,Liu L,Zeng C,et al.Activation of mTORC1 in subchondral bone preosteoblasts promotes osteoarthritis by stimulating bone sclerosis and secretion of CXCL12[J].Bone Res,2019,7:5.[2]Lenguerrand E,Whitehouse MR,Beswick AD,et al.Risk factors associated with revision for prosthetic joint infection after hip replacement: a prospective observational cohort study[J].Lancet Infect Dis,2018,18(9):1004-1014.[3]Pickett JE,Thompson JM,Sadowska A,et al.Molecularly specific detection of bacterial lipoteichoic acid for diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection of the bone[J].Bone Res,2018,6:13.[4]Ascione T,Barrack R,Benito N,et al.General Assembly, Diagnosis, Pathogen Isolation - Culture Matters: Proceedings of International Consensus on Orthopedic Infections[J].J Arthroplasty,2019,34(2S):S197-S206.[5]Watanabe S,Kobayashi N,Tomoyama A,et al.Clinical characteristics and risk factors for culture-negative periprosthetic joint infections[J].J Orthop Surg Res,2021,16(1):292.[6]Cai Y,Fang X,Chen Y,et al.Metagenomic next generation sequencing improves diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection by detecting the presence of bacteria in periprosthetic tissues[J].Int J Infect Dis,2020,96:573-578.[7]Fang X,Cai Y,Shi T,et al.Detecting the presence of bacteria in low-volume preoperative aspirated synovial fluid by metagenomic next-generation sequencing[J].Int J Infect Dis,2020,99:108-116.[8]Kildow BJ,Ryan SP,Danilkowicz R,et al.Next-generation sequencing not superior to culture in periprosthetic joint infection diagnosis[J].Bone Joint J,2021,103-B(1):26-31.[9]Tarabichi M,Shohat N,Goswami K,et al.Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: The Potential of Next-Generation Sequencing[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2018,100(2):147-154.[10]Jeon YJ,Zhou Y,Li Y,et al.The feasibility study of non-invasive fetal trisomy 18 and 21 detection with semiconductor sequencing platform[J].PLoS One,2014,9(10):e110240.[11]Salar O,Phillips J,Porter R.Diagnosis of knee prosthetic joint infection; aspiration and biopsy[J].Knee,2021,30:249-253.[12]Sigmund IK,Dudareva M,Watts D,et al.Limited diagnostic value of serum inflammatory biomarkers in the diagnosis of fracture-related infections[J],Bone Joint J,2020,102-B(7):904-911.[13]Ackmann T,M?觟llenbeck B,Gosheger G,et al.Comparing the Diagnostic Value of Serum D-Dimer to CRP and IL-6 in the Diagnosis of Chronic Prosthetic Joint Infection[J].J Clin Med,2020,9(9):2917.[14]Chen X,Li H,Zhu S,et al.Is D-dimer a reliable biomarker compared to ESR and CRP in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection?[J].Bone Joint Res,2020,9(10):701-708.[15]Shi W,Jiang Y,Wang Y,et al.The Diagnostic Value of Various Inflammatory Biomarkers for Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infection is Gender-Specific[J].J Inflamm Res,2022,15:3975-3982.[16]Xiong L,Li S,Dai M.Comparison of D-dimer with CRP and ESR for diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection[J].J Orthop Surg Res,2019,14(1):240.[17]Yin CM,Suen WC,Lin S,et al.Dysregulation of both miR-140-3p and miR-140-5p in synovial fluid correlate with osteoarthritis severity[J].Bone Joint Res,2017,6(11):612-618.[18]Hernandez NM,Taunton MJ,Perry KI,et al.The analysis of synovial fluid in total knee arthroplasties with flexion instability[J].Bone Joint J,2017,99-B(11):1477-1481.[19]Chen MF,Chang CH,Chiang-Ni C,et al.Rapid analysis of bacterial composition in prosthetic joint infection by 16S rRNA metagenomic sequencing[J].Bone Joint Res,2019,8(8):367-377.[20]Saleh A,George J,Faour M,et al.Serum biomarkers in periprosthetic joint infections[J].Bone Joint Res,2018,7(1):85-93.[21]Sousa R,Serrano P,Gomes Dias J,et al.Improving the accuracy of synovial fluid analysis in the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection with simple and inexpensive biomarkers:C-reactive protein and adenosine deaminase[J].Bone Joint J,2017,99-B(3):351-357.[22]Tang Y,Zhao D,Wang S,et al.Diagnostic Value of Next-Generation Sequencing in Periprosthetic Joint Infection:A Systematic Review[J].Orthop Surg,2022,14(2):190-198.[23]Tarabichi M,Alvand A,Shohat N,et al.Diagnosis of Streptococcus canis periprosthetic joint infection:the utility of next-generation sequencing[J].Arthroplast Today,2017,4(1):20-23.[24]Wang CX,Huang Z,Fang X,et al.Comparison of broad-range polymerase chain reaction and metagenomic next-generation sequencing for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection[J]. Int J Infect Dis,2020,95:8-12.[25]Tan TL,Kheir MM,Shohat N,et al.Culture-Negative Periprosthetic Joint Infection: An Update on What to Expect[J]. JB JS Open Access,2018,3(3):e0060.[26]Kuiper JWP,Verberne SJ,Vos SJ,et al.Does the Alpha Defensin ELISA Test Perform Better Than the Alpha Defensin Lateral Flow Test for PJI Diagnosis?A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2020,478(6):1333-1344.

相似文献/References:

[1]尹晓华,刘重元,黄 琳,等.胃癌中lncRNAs的研究进展[J].医学信息,2018,31(03):10.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.03.004]
　YIN Xiao-hua,LIU Zhong-yuan,HUANG Lin,et al.Research Progress of lncRNAs in Gastric Cancer[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(11):10.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.03.004]
[2]刘 坤,陈德春.基于生信学方法分析GSDM基因家族在膀胱癌的表达及临床意义[J].医学信息,2022,35(10):14.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.10.003]
　LIU Kun,CHEN De-chun.Expression and Clinical Significance of GSDM Gene Family in Bladder Cancer Based on Bioinformatics Analysis[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(11):14.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.10.003]
[3]陶碧君,刘建德,王玉洲.LncRNA FOXD3-AS1在恶性肿瘤中的表达、功能及作用机制[J].医学信息,2022,35(10):51.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.10.012]
　TAO Bi-jun,LIU Jian-de,WANG Yu-zhou.Expression, Function and Mechanism of LncRNA FOXD3-AS1 in Malignant Tumors[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(11):51.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.10.012]
[4]余世纪,谢勇丽,苏晓清.血清VDBP、IL-8、sTWEAK与尿VDBP早期诊断糖尿病肾病的价值[J].医学信息,2019,32(09):38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.09.013]
　YU Shi-ji,XIE Yong-li,SU Xiao-qing.The Value of Serum VDBP,IL-8,sTWEAK and Urine VDBP in Early Diagnosis of Diabetic Nephropathy[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(11):38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.09.013]
[5]王清华,易守芳,余明芳.肾移植术后药源性肾损伤生物标志物的研究[J].医学信息,2019,32(10):44.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.10.016]
　WANG Qing-hua,YI Shou-fang,YU Ming-fang.Study on Biomarkers of Drug-induced Renal Injury after Renal Transplantation[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(11):44.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.10.016]
[6]黄琪峰,郑琳琳,张 菁.生物信息学分析筛选肺腺癌靶基因及评估预后的价值[J].医学信息,2019,32(22):62.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.22.020]
　HUANG Qi-feng,ZHENG Lin-lin,ZHANG Jing.Bioinformatics Analysis of Screening Lung Adenocarcinoma Target Genes and Evaluating Prognostic Value[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(11):62.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.22.020]
[7]孟 华,苏馨雅,陆雯雯,等.CHA2DS2-VASc评分联合生物标志物对非瓣膜性心房颤动并发脑卒中诊断价值的系统综述[J].医学信息,2023,36(19):179.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.19.041]
　MENG Hua,SU Xin-ya,LU Wen-wen,et al.A Systematic Review of the Diagnostic Value of CHA2DS2-VASc Score Combined with Biomarkers for Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation Complicated by Stroke[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(11):179.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.19.041]
[8]施晓萍,韦 拔,蒋永江,等.新生儿败血症诊断中的生物标志物研究现状[J].医学信息,2020,33(06):35.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.06.011]
　SHI Xiao-ping,WEI Ba,JIANG Yong-jiang,et al.Research Status of Biomarkers in the Diagnosis of Neonatal Sepsis[J].Journal of Medical Information,2020,33(11):35.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.06.011]
[9]胡 静,钟晓波,朱士胜,等.颞下颌关节骨关节病关节液的定量蛋白质组学研究[J].医学信息,2020,33(10):65.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.10.019]
　HU Jing,ZHONG Xiao-bo,ZHU Shi-sheng,et al.Quantitative Proteomics Study on Joint Fluid of Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthropathy[J].Journal of Medical Information,2020,33(11):65.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.10.019]
[10]陈朴阳,刘 涛,范凯健.类风湿性关节炎的生物标志物及其测定[J].医学信息,2020,33(15):37.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.15.013]
　CHEN Pu-yang,LIU Tao,FAN Kai-jian.Biomarkers of Rheumatoid Arthritis and Their Determination[J].Journal of Medical Information,2020,33(11):37.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.15.013]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01