[1]陈云梅.梅毒初筛阳性患者对梅毒相关知识的知晓状况及影响因素研究[J].医学信息,2023,36(23):84-87.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.23.021]
　CHEN Yun-mei.Study on the Awareness of Syphilis-related Knowledge and its Influencing Factors in Patients with Positive Syphilis Screening[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(23):84-87.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.23.021]
点击复制

梅毒初筛阳性患者对梅毒相关知识的知晓状况及影响因素研究()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
36卷
期数:
2023年23期
页码:
84-87
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2023-12-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on the Awareness of Syphilis-related Knowledge and its Influencing Factors in Patients with Positive Syphilis Screening
文章编号:
1006-1959（2023）23-0084-04
作者:
陈云梅
（寻乌县疾病预防控制中心艾滋病性病预防控制科，江西 寻乌 342200）
Author(s):
CHEN Yun-mei
(AIDS and STD Prevention and Control Unit,Xunwu County Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Xunwu 342200,Jiangxi,China)
关键词:
梅毒; 初筛阳性; 知晓状况
Keywords:
Syphilis; Screening positive; Awareness status
分类号:
R759
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.23.021
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 研究梅毒初筛阳性患者对梅毒相关知识的知晓状况及影响因素。方法 选取2020年1月-2022年12月我中心梅毒初筛阳性72例患者为研究对象，采用自制梅毒传播与防治相关知识问卷，调查患者梅毒相关知识知晓情况，依据调查结果将患者分为知晓组和不知晓组，采用自制基本资料问卷调查表收集两组患者一般资料（性别、年龄、婚姻状况、文化程度、性取向、是否参加过相关宣传活动），分析影响梅毒初筛阳性患者梅毒相关知识知晓状况的因素。结果 72例梅毒初筛阳性患者中，梅毒相关知识知晓患者17例，占23.61%；不知晓患者55例，占76.39%；梅毒相关各项知识中非传播途径、母婴阻断知晓率均低于50.00%。不知晓组年龄＜20岁、异性恋、初中及以下文化程度、未参加相关宣传活动占比均高于知晓组（P＜0.05）；多因素Logistic回归分析显示，年龄＜20岁、初中及以下文化程度、未参加相关宣传活动为影响梅毒初筛阳性患者梅毒相关知识知晓的独立危险因素（P＜0.05）。结论 梅毒初筛阳性患者对梅毒相关知识的知晓水平较低，且与其年龄、文化程度、是否参加相关宣传活动密切相关，临床可针对独立危险因素给予针对性预防，以减少梅毒传播，控制梅毒感染。
Abstract:
Objective To study the awareness of syphilis-related knowledge and its influencing factors in patients with positive syphilis screening.Methods From January 2020 to December 2022, 72 patients with positive syphilis screening in our center were selected as the research objects. The self-made questionnaire on syphilis transmission and prevention was used to investigate the awareness of syphilis-related knowledge. According to the survey results, the patients were divided into the awareness group and the unawareness group. The self-made basic data questionnaire was used to collect the general data of the two groups (gender, age, marital status, education level, sexual orientation, and whether they participated in relevant publicity activities), and the factors affecting the awareness of syphilis-related knowledge in patients with positive syphilis screening were analyzed.Results Among the 72 patients with positive syphilis screening, 17 patients were aware of syphilis-related knowledge, accounting for 23.61%; 55 patients who did not know, accounting for 76.39%. The awareness rates of non-transmission routes and mother-to-child block in syphilis-related knowledge were lower than 50.00%. The proportions of age <20 years old, heterosexuality, education level of junior high school and below, and not participating in relevant publicity activities in the unawareness group were higher than those in the awareness group (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age <20 years old, education level of junior high school and below, and failure to participate in relevant publicity activities were independent risk factors affecting the awareness of syphilis-related knowledge in patients with positive syphilis screening (P<0.05).Conclusion Patients with positive syphilis screening have a low level of knowledge about syphilis, which is closely related to their age, education level and participation in relevant publicity activities. Clinically, targeted prevention can be given for independent risk factors to reduce the spread of syphilis and control syphilis infection.

参考文献/References:

[1]Thean L,Moore A,Nourse C.New trends in congenital syphilis:epidemiology,testing in pregnancy,and management[J].Curr Opin Infect Dis,2022,35(5):452-460. [2]余军,张琬悦,马艳玲,等.云南省某地区农村居民梅毒知识知晓情况及影响因素[J].中国公共卫生管理,2018,34(3):426-428.[3]Satyaputra F,Hendry S,Braddick M,et al.The Laboratory Diagnosis of Syphilis[J].J Clin Microbiol,2021,59(10):e0010021.[4]利超强,陈发颖,陈清.2011-2020年肇庆市梅毒流行病学特征变化[J].实用医学杂志,2022,38(13):1685-1689.[5]潘程,彭炜.2015-2020年广东省某市大学生HIV/梅毒感染现状、性行为特征及健康教育措施分析[J].中国健康教育,2022,38(11):1028-1031,1051.[6]葛琳,李东民,李培龙,等.2010-2015年中国艾滋病哨点监测人群HIV、梅毒和HCV感染状况分析[J].疾病监测,2017,32(2):111-117.[7]闫学莉,高明伟,王志强,等.山西省吕梁地区不同人群梅毒防治知识知晓率调查[J].中国药物与临床,2018,18(9):1517-1518.[8]朱海霞,李平.2016-2018年济宁地区暗娼人群艾滋病相关知识及HIV、梅毒和丙肝感染情况分析[J].华南预防医学,2019,45(4):363-366.[9]还锡萍,王小亮,傅更锋,等.江苏省不同人群梅毒预防知识知晓率调查[J].南京医科大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(9):1320-1323.[10]刘宗霞.邢台市性病防治医务人员梅毒知识知晓情况调查[J].热带医学杂志,2018,18(12):1659-1661,1665.[11]郑铁洪,朱红,帅俊,等.2015年深圳市城市居民梅毒防治知识知晓情况调查分析[J].中国艾滋病性病,2017,23(4):326-329.[12]Morales-Múnera CE,Fuentes-Finkelstein PA, Vall Mayans M.Update on the diagnosis and treatment of syphilis[J].Actas Dermosifiliogr,2015,106(1):68-69.[13]Medoro AK, Sánchez PJ.Syphilis in Neonates and Infants[J].Clin Perinatol,2021,48(2):293-309.[14]金慧莉,丁莉莉.普外科梅毒初筛阳性患者对梅毒相关知识的知晓状况及影响因素分析[J].中国性科学,2021,30(11):148-151.[15]黄燕惠,刘开钳,黄志明,等.深圳市宝安区重点干预人群梅毒知识知晓率的现况调查[J].中国皮肤性病学杂志,2017,31(6):636-640,670.[16]徐增辉,计国平,洪涛,等.安徽省孕妇人群梅毒防治知识调查分析[J].中国艾滋病性病,2018,24(3):279-282.[17]朱元浩,邵健锋,高峰,等.广东省妊娠合并梅毒母婴传播影响因素分析[J].疾病监测,2022,37(12):1536-1541.[18]刘晓丹,孙作岚,张慧娟.孕妇梅毒防治知识知晓情况调查[J].医学动物防制,2018,34(5):437-440.[19]焦寒梅,蒋跃辉.郑州市医疗机构梅毒母婴阻断效果影响因素分析[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2019,27(3):374-378.

相似文献/References:

[1]杨 凯.苄星青霉素在HIV感染合并梅毒中的临床疗效观察[J].医学信息,2018,31(12):141.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.12.044]
　YANG Kai.Clinical Efficacy of Benzathine Penicillin in HIV Infection with Syphilis[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(23):141.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.12.044]
[2]陶春妃.TP-光激化学发光、TPPA、TRUST试验的临床应用评价[J].医学信息,2019,32(23):164.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.23.052]
　TAO Chun-fei.Clinical Application Evaluation of TP-photoexcited Chemiluminescence,TPPA and TRUST Test[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(23):164.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.23.052]
[3]王可玲,于艳妮,刘 鹏.梅毒的临床分期特征及其实验室检测方法[J].医学信息,2020,33(06):27.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.06.009]
　PANG Yan-hui,PENG Wei,TAO Wen-jie,et al.Clinical Staging Characteristics of Syphilis and its Laboratory Detection Methods[J].Journal of Medical Information,2020,33(23):27.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.06.009]
[4]程玉燕,李蔚然,杨 森.2010~2015年合肥市某三甲医院梅毒流行特征报告[J].医学信息,2020,33(10):130.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.10.038]
　CHENG Yu-yan,LI Wei-ran,YANG Sen.Epidemiological Characteristics of Syphilis in a Top Three Hospital in Hefei from 2010 to 2015[J].Journal of Medical Information,2020,33(23):130.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.10.038]
[5]徐田梅.2011-2020年抚顺市东洲区梅毒病流行病学分析[J].医学信息,2022,35(05):150.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.05.039]
　XU Tian-mei.Epidemiological Analysis of Syphilis in Dongzhou District of Fushun City from 2011 to 2020[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(23):150.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.05.039]
[6]周贤位,杨水秀,肖文革,等.梅毒患者血清学检测结果分析[J].医学信息,2022,35(11):16.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.11.005]
　ZHOU Xian-wei,YANG Shui-xiu,XIAO Wen-ge,et al.Analysis of Serological Test Results of Syphilis Patients[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(23):16.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.11.005]
[7]曾冬梅.ELISA法和TRUST法在梅毒检测中的应用[J].医学信息,2022,35(17):138.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.17.038]
　ZENG Dong-mei.Application of ELISA and TRUST in Syphilis Detection[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(23):138.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.17.038]
[8]冯林冬.不同检测方法在梅毒特异性抗体筛查诊断中的价值分析[J].医学信息,2024,37(17):146.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.17.032]
　FENG Lin-dong.Value of Different Detection Methods in the Screening and Diagnosis of Syphilis Specific Antibodies[J].Journal of Medical Information,2024,37(23):146.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.17.032]
[9]刘小明.医疗机构HIV初筛阳性报告流行病学调查分析[J].医学信息,2024,37(19):58.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.19.009]
　LIU Xiaoming.Epidemiological Investigation and Analysis of HIV Screening Positive Report in Medical Institutions[J].Journal of Medical Information,2024,37(23):58.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.19.009]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01