[1]金会艳,李浩瑜,李 响,等.两种小鼠尾静脉采血法进行血糖检测的比较分析[J].医学信息,2024,37(02):99-102.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.02.018]
　JIN Hui-yan,LI Hao-yu,LI Xiang,et al.Comparison and Analysis of Blood Glucose Detection by Two Collection Methods of Tail Vein Blood Sampling in Mice[J].Journal of Medical Information,2024,37(02):99-102.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.02.018]
点击复制

两种小鼠尾静脉采血法进行血糖检测的比较分析()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
37卷
期数:
2024年02期
页码:
99-102
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2024-01-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison and Analysis of Blood Glucose Detection by Two Collection Methods of Tail Vein Blood Sampling in Mice
文章编号:
1006-1959（2024）02-0099-04
作者:
金会艳; 李浩瑜; 李 响; 等
（1.昆明医科大学基础医学院实验教学中心机能学实验室，云南 昆明 650500；2.昆明医科大学第一临床学院，云南 昆明 650500；3.昆明医科大学基础医学，云南 昆明 650500；4.云南大学医学院，云南 昆明 650500）
Author(s):
JIN Hui-yan; LI Hao-yu; LI Xiang; et al.
(1.Experimental Teaching Center,Faculty of Basic Medical Science,Kunming Medical University,Kunming 650500,Yunnan,China;2.The First Clinical Medical College,Kunming Medical University,Kunming 650500,Yunnan,China;3.School of Basic Medical Sciences,Kunming Medical University,Kunming 650500,Yunnan,China;4.School of Medicine,Yunnan University,Kunming 650500,Yunnan,China)
关键词:
刺破尾静脉采血法; 剪尾采血法; 血糖值; 小鼠
Keywords:
Punctured tail vein blood collection method; Cut tail blood collection method; Blood glucose value; Mice
分类号:
R-332
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.02.018
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 比较刺破尾静脉采血法与剪尾采血法检测的小鼠血糖值，从而评价两种采血方法的可行性，探讨一种稳定、有效及符合实验动物伦理学的小鼠末梢静脉全血血糖值的科学检测实验方法。方法 选取健康C57BL/6J小鼠，分别采用刺破尾静脉采血法和剪尾采血法采集血样检测其空腹血糖值，比较两种采血方法采集的血样所测血糖值的差异，并分析其相关性。结果 刺破尾静脉采血法检测血糖值为（7.58±0.92）mmol/L，与剪尾采血法的（7.61±1.02）mmol/L比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05），但是刺破尾静脉采血法检测血糖与剪尾采血法检测血糖值有正线性趋势，回归分析方程式为：y（剪尾采血法）=1.898+0.746x（刺破尾静脉采血法）。结论 刺破尾静脉采血与剪尾采血检测出来的血糖值无差异，两种采血方法检测的血糖值有正线性趋势。
Abstract:
Objective To compare the blood glucose values of mice detected by punctured tail vein blood collection method and cut tail blood collection method, so as to evaluate the feasibility of the two blood collection methods, and to explore a stable, effective and scientific experimental method for detecting the blood glucose value of peripheral vein blood in mice.Methods The healthy C57BL/6J mice were selected, and blood samples were collected by puncture tail vein blood collection method and cut tail blood collection method to detect their fasting blood glucose values. The differences in blood glucose values measured by blood samples collected by the two blood collection methods were compared, and their correlation was analyzed.Results The blood glucose value was (7.58±0.92)mmol/L by puncture tail vein blood collection method, which was compared with (7.61±1.02)mmol/L by cutting the tail blood collection method, the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Whereas there was a positive linear trend between the detection of FBG by two blood collection methods and the regression analysis equation was: y (cut tail blood collection method)=1.898+0.746x (puncture tail vein blood collection).Conclusion There is no difference in blood glucose values detected by punctured tail vein blood collection method and cut tail blood collection method. The blood glucose values detected by the two blood collection methods have a positive linear trend.

参考文献/References:

[1]Afshin A,Forouzanfar MH,Reitsma MB,et al.Health Effects ofOverweight and Obesity in 195 Countries over 25 Years[J].N Engl J Med,2017,377(1):13-27.[2]朱梦梦,张泽家,赵琳,等.单纯性肥胖小鼠动物模型的构建及评价[J].医学理论与实践,2020,33(3):345-347,350.[3]Xu Y,Fu JF,Chen JH,et al.Sulforaphane ameliorates glucose intolerance in obese mice via the upregulation of the insulin signaling pathway[J].Food Funct,2018,9(9):4695-4701.[4]Doulberis M,Papaefthymiou A,Polyzos SA,et al.Rodent models of obesity[J].Minerva Endocrinol,2020,45(3):243-263.[5]Maric I,Krieger JP,van der Velden P,et al.Sex and Species Differences in the Development of Diet-Induced Obesity and Metabolic Disturbances in Rodents[J].Front Nutr,2022,9:828522.[6]Daniels Gatward LF,Kennard MR,Smith LIF,et al.The use of mice in diabetes research: The impact of physiological characteristics, choice of model and husbandry practices[J].Diabet Med,2021,38(12):e14711.[7]Ahrens Kress AP,Zhang Y,Kaiser-Vry AR,et al.A Comparison of Blood Collection Techniques in Mice and their Effects on Welfare[J].J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci,2022,61(3):287-295.[8]黄浙学,朱青青,余雨滋,等.大小鼠多种连续微量采血法的比较[J].江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2022,46(2):164-170.[9]杨健莉,刘佳,郑志红.常用实验大小鼠采血方法及其对实验动物福利的影响[J].中国比较医学杂志,2019,29(1):90-94.[10]苏达,高利红.实验动物伦理新原则的框架分析与我国相关立法发展方向[J].中国比较医学杂志,2022,32(11):107-112.[11]Beauchamp TO,Degrazia DA.Principles of animal research ethics[M].UK:Oxford University Press,2020.[12]Kennard MR,Daniels Gatward LF,Roberts AG,et al.The use of mice in diabetes research: The impact of experimental protocols[J].Diabet Med,2021,38(12):e14705.[13]Danne T,Nimri R,Battelino T,et al.International Consensus on Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring[J].Diabetes Care,2017,40(12):1631-1640.[14]杨柳,杨华,刘云,等.球后静脉注射在裸小鼠纳米粒静脉给药中的可行性探讨[J].实验动物与比较医学,2016,36(2):117-120,133.[15]何丽.应激性高血糖与急性心肌梗死的机制研究[J].医学信息,2022,35(10):74-77.[16]Kang YJ,Sim YB,Park SH,et al.Involvement of α(2)-adrenergic receptor in the regulation of the blood glucose level induced by immobilization stress[J].Archives of Pharmacal Research,2015,38(5):921-929.[17]Gjendal K,Kiersgaard MK,Abelson K,et al.Comparison of sublingual, facial and retro-bulbar blood sampling in mice in relation to animal welfare and blood quality[J].J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods,2020,103:106680.[18]蒲瑞阳,史典,刘莎,等.2型糖尿病小鼠模型血糖干预评价点的实验观察[J].中国实验动物学报,2020,28(2):224-229.[19]宋冰,辜吉秀,汪永锋,等.实验动物替代技术研究[J].中国实验动物学报,2020,28(5):680-687.[20]King AJF,Kennard MR,Nandi M.Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Conscious Unrestrained Mice[J].Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, NJ),2020,2128:225-239.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01