[1]彭 容,张泽明,赵张平,等.CT严重指数与APACHEⅡ评分对急性胰腺炎严重程度的诊断价值[J].医学信息,2024,37(04):108-112.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.04.019]
 PENG Rong,ZHANG Ze-ming,ZHAO Zhang-ping,et al.Diagnostic Value of CT Severity Index and APACHEⅡ Score in the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis[J].Journal of Medical Information,2024,37(04):108-112.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.04.019]
点击复制

CT严重指数与APACHEⅡ评分对急性胰腺炎严重程度的诊断价值
分享到:

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
37卷
期数:
2024年04期
页码:
108-112
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2024-02-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Diagnostic Value of CT Severity Index and APACHEⅡ Score in the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis
文章编号:
1006-1959(2024)04-0108-05
作者:
彭 容张泽明赵张平
(攀枝花市中心医院放射影像科,四川 攀枝花 617067)
Author(s):
PENG RongZHANG Ze-mingZHAO Zhang-pinget al.
(Department of Radiology,Panzhihua Central Hospital,Panzhihua 617067,Sichuan,China)
关键词:
CT严重指数急性生理和慢性健康评分急性胰腺炎
Keywords:
Computed tomography severity indexAcute physiology and chronic healthy evaluation Ⅱ scoreAcute pancreatitis
分类号:
R576.1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.04.019
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探究CT严重指数(CTSI)与急性生理和慢性健康评分(APACHEⅡ评分)对急性胰腺炎(AP)患者预后的评估效能。方法 回顾性分析我院2021年1月-12月收治的273例AP患者,观察其腹部增强CT图像,根据CT表现分为水肿性AP和坏死性AP,并根据其图像进行CTSI评分。在入院后24 h内计算APACHEⅡ评分、局部并发症、死亡、住院时间及入住ICU天数。分析CTSI、APACHEⅡ评分分别与局部并发症、死亡、住院时间及入住ICU天数的关系。结果 在AP患者中,发生局部并发症的患者CTSI评分高于无局部并发症的患者(P<0.05);有、无局部并发症患者的APACHEⅡ评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);死亡患者APACHE Ⅱ评分高于存活患者(P<0.05);死亡与存活患者的CTSI评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);在预测住院天数方面,CTSI评分及APACHE Ⅱ评分越高,住院时间越久(r=0.340、0.264)。需要转入ICU患者的CTSI评分及APACHE Ⅱ评分均高于不需要转入ICU的患者(P<0.05)。结论 在急性胰腺炎患者中,CTSI评分在评估局部并发症方面优于APACHEⅡ评分,但在评价死亡方面不如APACHEⅡ评分;CTSI及APACHEⅡ评分均能预测患者住院天数和是否转入ICU。
Abstract:
Objective To study the computed tomography severity index(CTSI) and the acute physiology and chronic healthy evaluation Ⅱ (APACHEⅡ) on the prognosis of patients with acute pancreatitis (AP).Methods A retrospective analysis of 273 AP patients admitted to our hospital from January to December 2021 was performed to observe their abdominal enhanced CT images. According to CT findings, they were divided into edematous AP and necrotic AP, and CTSI scores were performed according to their images. APACHEⅡ score, local complications, death, hospitalization time and ICU stay were calculated within 24 hours after admission. The relationship between CTSI, APACHEⅡ score and local complications, death, hospitalization time and ICU stay was analyzed.Results In AP patients, the CTSI score of patients with local complications was higher than that of patients without local complications (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in APACHEⅡ score between patients with and without local complications (P>0.05). The APACHEⅡ score of the dead patients was higher than that of the survival patients (P<0.05), while, there was no significant difference in CTSI score between dead and surviving patients (P>0.05). In terms of predicting hospitalization days, the higher the CTSI score and APACHEⅡ score, the longer the hospitalization time (r=0.340, 0.264). The CTSI score and APACHEⅡ score of patients who needed to be transferred to ICU were higher than those of patients who did not need to be transferred to ICU (P<0.05).Conclusion In patients with acute pancreatitis, CTSI score is superior to APACHEⅡ score in evaluating local complications, but inferior to APACHEⅡ score in evaluating death. Both CTSI and APACHEⅡ scores can predict the length of hospital stay and whether patients are transferred to ICU.

参考文献/References:

[1]Peng R,Zhang L,Zhang ZM,et al.Chest computed tomography semi-quantitative pleural effusion and pulmonary consolidation are early predictors of acute pancreatitis severity[J].Quant Imaging Med Surg,2020,10(2):451-463. [2]Tang W,Zhang XM,Xiao B,et al.Magnetic resonance imaging versus Acute Physiology And Chronic Healthy Evaluation II score in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis[J].Eur J Radiol,2011,80(3):637-42. [3]Banks PA,Bollen TL,Dervenis C,et al.Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group. Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus[J].Gut,2013,62(1):102-111. [4]杨淑洁.CT严重指数结合APACHE-Ⅱ评分对急性胰腺炎严重程度及预后的评估[J].中国CT和MRI杂志,2020,18(2):98-101. [5]Yeung YP,Lam BY,Yip AW.APACHE system is better than Ranson system in the prediction of severity of acute pancreatitis[J].Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int,2006,5(2):294-299. [6]Triantopoulou C,Lytras D,Maniatis P,et al.Computed tomography versus Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score in predicting severity of acute pancreatitis: a prospective, comparative study with statistical evaluation[J].Pancreas,2007,35(3):238-242. [7]Raghuwanshi S,Gupta R,Vyas MM,et al.CT Evaluation of Acute Pancreatitis and its Prognostic Correlation with CT Severity Index[J].J Clin Diagn Res,2016,10(6):TC06-TC11. [8]冷芳,杨力,常志刚,等.急性胰腺炎分类——2012:亚特兰大分类和定义修订的国际共识[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2013,29(4):322-328. [9]解超莲.急性胰腺炎早期合并门静脉系统血栓形成的MRI研究[D].南充:川北医学院,2018. [10]彭卫军.螺旋CT在急性胰腺炎诊断及病情分级中的应用[J].中国CT和MRI杂志,2018,16(2):17-19. [11]Balthazar EJ,Ranson JH,Naidich DP,et al.Acute pancreatitis: prognostic value of CT[J].Radiology,1985,156:767-772. [12]王健,郁毅刚,林庆斌.改良CT严重指数和CT严重指数对急性胰腺炎严重程度和预后的预测价值[J].中国医师进修杂志,2018,41(1):21-25. [13]De Sanctis JT,Lee MJ,Gazelle GS,et al.Prognostic indicators in acute pancreatitis:CT vs APACHE II[J].Clin Radiol,1997,52:842-848. [14]唐洁,李云.各评分系统对胰腺炎疾病严重程度预测价值的临床研究[J].临床外科杂志,2015(6):440-443. [15]Spitzer AL,Thoeni RF,Barcia AM,et al.Early nonenhancedabdominal computed tomography can predict mortality in severe acute pancreatitis[J].J Gastrointest Surg,2005,9:928-933. [16]Balthazar EJ,Robinson DL,Megibow AJ,et al.Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis[J].Radiology,1990,174:331-336. [17]刘泓男.基于亚特兰大新分级应用四种不同评分系统回顾性分析急性胰腺炎的严重程度[D].大连:大连医科大学,2015. [18]Bollen TL,Singh VK,Maurer R,et al.Comparative evaluation of the modified CT severity index and CT severity index in assessing severity of acute pancreatitis[J].Am J Roentgenol,2011,197:386-392. [19]Sharma V,Rana SS,Sharma RK,et al.A study of radiological scoring system evaluating extrapancreatic inflammation with conventional radiological and clinical scores in predicting outcomes in acute pancreatitis[J].Ann Gastroenterol,2015,28:399-404. [20]Sahu B,Abbey P,Anand R,et al.Severity assessment of acute pancreatitis using CT severity index and modified CT severity index: Correlation with clinical outcomes and severity grading as per the Revised Atlanta Classification[J].Indian J Radiol Imaging,2017,27(2):152-160.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01