[1]张 腾.护理风险和暴力风险评估护理在双向情感障碍患者安全护理中的应用效果[J].医学信息,2024,37(10):149-152.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.10.032]
　ZHANG Teng.Application Effect of Nursing Risk and Violence Risk Assessment Nursing in Safety Nursing of Patients with Bipolar Disorder[J].Journal of Medical Information,2024,37(10):149-152.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.10.032]
点击复制

护理风险和暴力风险评估护理在双向情感障碍患者安全护理中的应用效果()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
37卷
期数:
2024年10期
页码:
149-152
栏目:
护理研究
出版日期:
2024-05-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application Effect of Nursing Risk and Violence Risk Assessment Nursing in Safety Nursing of Patients with Bipolar Disorder
文章编号:
1006-1959（2024）10-0149-04
作者:
张 腾
（江西康宁医院/江西省荣誉军人康复医院精神科，江西 南昌 330000）
Author(s):
ZHANG Teng
(Psychiatric Department of Jiangxi Kangning Hospital/Jiangxi Honorary Military Rehabilitation Hospital,Nanchang 330000,Jiangxi,China)
关键词:
双向情感障碍; 护理风险评估; 暴力风险评估; 安全护理; 躁狂
Keywords:
Bipolar disorder; Nursing risk assessment; Violence risk assessment; Safety nursing; Mania
分类号:
R473.74
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.10.032
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 研究护理风险和暴力风险评估护理在双向情感障碍（BD）患者安全护理中的应用效果。方法 选取2020年3月-2022年3月江西康宁医院收治的60例BD患者，采用随机数字表法分为对照组（30例）与观察组（30例）。对照组行常规安全护理，观察组在其基础上应用护理风险和暴力风险评估护理，比较两组不良风险事件、贝克-拉范森躁狂量表（BRMS）评分、汉密尔顿抑郁量表（HAMD）评分、社会交往能力[容纳他人量表（AOS）、社会适应能力量表（SAFE）]、家属满意率。结果 观察组不良风险事件发生率低于对照组（P＜0.05）；观察组护理后BRMS评分、HAMD评分、SAFE评分低于对照组，AOS评分高于对照组（P＜0.05）；观察组家属满意率高于对照组（P＜0.05）。结论 护理风险和暴力风险评估护理可减少BD患者的不良风险事件，缓解其躁狂、抑郁症状，改善患者社会交往能力，提高家属满意度。
Abstract:
Objective To study the application effect of nursing risk and violence risk assessment nursing in the safety nursing of patients with bipolar disorder (BD).Methods Sixty patients with BD admitted to Jiangxi Kangning Hospital from March 2020 to March 2022 were selected and divided into control group (30 patients) and observation group (30 patients) by random number table method. The control group received routine safety nursing, and the observation group applied nursing risk and violence risk assessment nursing on the basis of the control group. The adverse risk events, Beck-Rafaelsen Mania Scale (BRMS) score, Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) score, social interaction ability [Accommodation of Others Scale (AOS), Social Adaptation Ability Scale (SAFE)] and family satisfaction rate were compared between the two groups.Results The incidence of adverse risk events in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). After nursing, the BRMS score, HAMD score and SAFE score of the observation group were lower than those of the control group, and the AOS score was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). The satisfaction rate of family members in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion Nursing risk and violence risk assessment nursing can reduce the adverse risk events of BD patients, relieve their manic and depressive symptoms, improve their social interaction ability and improve their family satisfaction.

参考文献/References:

[1]姚秀钰,邵静,王丽娜,等.京津冀地区精神科专科医院暴力攻击及风险评估现状与启示[J].中国实用护理杂志,2020,36(33):2616-2622.[2]Masi G,Lupetti I,D’Acunto G,et al.A Comparison between Severe Suicidality and Nonsuicidal Self-Injury Behaviors in Bipolar Adolescents Referred to a Psychiatric Emergency Unit[J].Brain Sciences,2021,11(6):790.[3]徐江玲,程艮,封砚村,等.400例情感性精神障碍患者保护性约束的现状调查[J].中华现代护理杂志,2020,26(28):3960-3964.[4]王艳,孙平.护理风险管理对精神科患者家属满意度和医疗安全不良事件发生率的影响[J].中国药物与临床,2021,21(22):3790-3792.[5]陈刚,黄杰萍,谭桂燕,等.暴力风险评估在精神分裂症患者安全护理中的应用[J].护理实践与研究,2021,18(2):290-292.[6]于欣,方贻儒.中国双相障碍防治指南[M].2版.北京:中华医学电子音像出版社,2016:60.[7]蔡丽丹,骆新友,林嘉豪,等.护士观察量表联合Braden压疮危险评估量表在精神心理科住院患者压疮风险中的评估价值[J].中国医药导报,2018,15(29):145-148.[8]何建锋,洪武,邵阳,等.MOAS在住院精神障碍患者暴力风险评估中的应用[J].法医学杂志,2017,33(1):28-31.[9]王晓利,闵国营,安鸿.互动达标理论下临床护理对双相情感障碍患者社会功能及认知功能的影响[J].检验医学与临床,2020,17(2):240-243.[10]王颖昭,王静,李卫彬.双相情感障碍躁狂发作患者行系统护理干预的效果[J].贵州医药,2020,44(9):1480-1481.[11]冯桂萍.护理风险管理在住院精神病患者管理中的应用[J].山西医药杂志,2019,48(19):2418-2420.[12]于伟文.综合护理对精神科门诊有暴力风险患者的干预效果[J].临床精神医学杂志,2019,29(4):242.[13]刘寰.精神科护理中不良事件的原因和对策研究[J].中国药物与临床,2018,18(1):141-143.[14]Crusey A,Schuller KA,Trace J.Access to care barriers for patients with Bipolar disorder in the United States[J].Journal of Healthcare Quality Research,2020,35(3):167-172.[15]陈刚,罗思欢,居丽晶.首次护理风险评估表和暴力风险评估表在双向情感障碍患者安全护理评估中的应用[J].海南医学,2019,30(16):2170-2173.[16]张润琴,王玲花,封钢.积极心理学团体护理干预在康复期双相情感障碍病人中的应用效果研究[J].护理研究,2022,36(3):535-537.[17]Licht RW,Nielsen RE.Adverse events associated with mood stabiliser treatment should be continuously monitored in patients diagnosed with bipolar affective disorder[J].BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine,2017,22(2):74.[18]邓蓉林,岳玉川,吴冬梅.精神科患者护理风险标准化评估及管理[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2019,25(1):129-131.[19]冯雪.现状-背景-评估-建议护理沟通模式对双相情感障碍躁狂发作患者躁狂水平的影响[J].山西医药杂志,2022,51(3):354-356.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01