[1]梅文佳.前瞻性主动护理模式对四肢开放性骨折并皮肤软组织缺损患者创面修复及功能恢复的影响[J].医学信息,2024,37(14):162-165.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.14.034]
　MEI Wen-jia.Effect of Prospective Active Nursing Mode on Wound Repair and Functional Recovery in Patients with Open Fracture of the Extremities and Skin and Soft Tissue Defect[J].Journal of Medical Information,2024,37(14):162-165.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.14.034]
点击复制

前瞻性主动护理模式对四肢开放性骨折并皮肤软组织缺损患者创面修复及功能恢复的影响()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
37卷
期数:
2024年14期
页码:
162-165
栏目:
护理研究
出版日期:
2024-07-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of Prospective Active Nursing Mode on Wound Repair and Functional Recovery in Patients with Open Fracture of the Extremities and Skin and Soft Tissue Defect
文章编号:
1006-1959（2024）14-0162-04
作者:
梅文佳
（湖口县人民医院外科，江西 湖口 332500）
Author(s):
MEI Wen-jia
(Department of Surgery,Hukou County People’s Hospital,Hukou 332500,Jiangxi,China)
关键词:
前瞻性主动护理; 四肢开放性骨折; 软组织缺损; 创面修复; 生活自理能力
Keywords:
Prospective active nursing; Open fracture of the extremities; Soft tissue defect; Wound repair; Self-care ability
分类号:
R473
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.14.034
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 观察前瞻性主动护理模式对四肢开放性骨折并皮肤软组织缺损患者创面修复及功能恢复的影响。方法 选取2019年5月-2022年5月我院接诊的66例四肢开放性骨折并皮肤软组织缺损患者为研究对象，采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组，各组33例。对照组应用常规护理，观察组在对照组基础上应用前瞻性主动护理模式，比较两组创面愈合时间、住院时间、创面愈合优良率、并发症发生率、护理满意度及生活自理能力。结果 观察组创面愈合时间、住院时间均短于对照组（P＜0.05）；观察组创面愈合优良率为90.91%，高于对照组的75.76%（P＜0.05）；观察组并发症发生率为9.10%，低于对照组的21.21%（P＜0.05）；观察组护理满意度为96.97%，高于对照组的81.82%（P＜0.05）；两组干预后生活自理能力评分均高于干预前，且观察组高于对照组（P＜0.05）。结论 前瞻性主动护理模式可促进四肢开放性骨折并皮肤软组织缺损患者创面修复，缩短愈合和住院时间，提高愈合优良率，降低并发症发生率，提升护理满意度，促进患者肢体功能恢复。
Abstract:
Objective To observe the effect of prospective active nursing mode on wound repair and functional recovery in patients with open fracture of the extremities and skin and soft tissue defect.Methods A total of 66 patients with open fractures of the extremities and skin and soft tissue defects admitted to our hospital from May 2019 to May 2022 were selected as the research objects. They were divided into control group and observation group by random number table method, with 33 patients in each group. The control group was treated with routine nursing, and the observation group was treated with prospective active nursing mode on the basis of the control group. The wound healing time, hospitalization time, excellent and good rate of wound healing, complication rate, nursing satisfaction and self-care ability were compared between the two groups.Results The wound healing time and hospitalization time of the observation group were shorter than those of the control group (P<0.05). The excellent and good rate of wound healing in the observation group was 90.91%, which was higher than 75.76% in the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the observation group was 9.10%, which was lower than 21.21% in the control group (P<0.05). The nursing satisfaction of the observation group was 96.97%, which was higher than 81.82% of the control group (P<0.05). The score of self-care ability of the two groups after intervention was higher than that before intervention, and that of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion Prospective active nursing mode can promote wound repair in patients with open fracture of the extremities and skin and soft tissue defects, shorten healing and hospitalization time, improve the excellent and good rate of healing, reduce the incidence of complications, improve nursing satisfaction, and promote the recovery of limb function in patients.

参考文献/References:

[1]国莉莉,刘晓曼.前瞻性护理应用于急性心肌梗死中的效果分析[J].中国循证心血管医学杂志,2019,11(6):716-718.[2]林惠,姚木兰,黎扬丽,等.预见性护理对游离皮瓣移植修复四肢皮肤软组织缺损的效果分析[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2019,40(8):1050-1052.[3]武艳云,赵辉.精细化护理模式在穿支皮瓣修复四肢皮肤软组织缺损的应用研究[J].山西医药杂志,2018,47(22):2745-2748.[4]吉润芷,王艳,王鹿婷,等.前瞻性护理在高血压性脑出血偏瘫病人中的应用[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2020,25(9):635-636.[5]张洁,杨李桦,李俊梅,等.医护一体化模式对皮肤牵张器闭合胫骨骨折术后皮肤软组织缺损患者的效果评价[J].西部医学,2018,30(12):1864-1868.[6]傅育红,朱琳怡,莫兰,等.VSD联合亚急性游离皮瓣修复上肢CustiloⅢ型开放性骨折伴软组织缺损的康复护理[J].中华显微外科杂志,2018,41(3):301-303.[7]中华医学会骨科学分会创伤骨科学组,中华医学会骨科学分会外固定与肢体重建学组,中国医师协会创伤外科医师分会创伤感染专业委员会,等.中国开放性骨折诊断与治疗指南(2019版)[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2019,21(11):921-928.[8]邵斌峰,林佩达.四肢骨折内固定术后切口感染的有关因素分析[J].浙江医学,2019,41(3):278-279.[9]杜浩,王坤,涂世成,等.四肢开放性骨折合并感染患者外周血Th1/Th2平衡及相关细胞因子变化研究[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2020,35(11):1146-1149.[10]陈福灵,邹文.不同压力参数下伤处脉冲冲洗在开放性骨折清创治疗中的影响[J].检验医学与临床,2020,17(23):3517-3519.[11]李佳,胡向英.精细化护理对于开放性四肢骨折术后切口感染的影响研究[J].山西医药杂志,2019,48(16):2085-2087.[12]孟霞,王春艳,欧勤芳,等.前瞻性护理干预对ICU清醒病人睡眠质量及焦虑,抑郁的影响[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2019,44(11):1563-1566.[13]陈芳皞.手术室护理对开放性四肢骨折术切口感染的影响[J].中国伤残医学,2020,28(6):90-92.[14]张娜,张雨欢,江丽丽,等.影响四肢骨折术后延迟愈合发生率的危险因素分析[J].护理实践与研究,2019,16(22):29-31.[15]李筱红,钟素珍,李小华.中医护理干预对四肢骨折患者围术期功能恢复及生活质量的影响[J].国际护理学杂志,2019,38(17):2861-2864.[16]李萍,壮静,陆海平,等.中医临床护理路径在四肢骨折患者中的应用效果[J].护理实践与研究,2019,16(13):52-54.[17]张琼.前瞻性主动护理模式对四肢开放性骨折并皮肤软组织缺损患者创面修复及心理状况的影响研究[J].中国美容医学,2022,31(3):168-171.[18]潘亚英,王华,张萍,等.四肢严重开放性骨折患者行负压封闭引流技术加外固定器治疗的术后护理及对患者精神心理影响[J].广西医科大学学报,2017,34(3):470-474.[19]李寒梅,张金枝.封闭负压引流术治疗下肢骨折骨外露伴大面积软组织损伤的护理效果观察[J].医学信息,2018,31(23):177-179.[20]刘思婷,张志忠,陈琼.流程化护理措施对VSD修复创伤性骨折合并软组织损伤的创面恢复及预后的影响[J].海南医学,2019,30(13):1763-1766.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01