[1]曾仁仁.TAPP与TEP治疗成人腹股沟疝的效果及对术后VAS评分和预后恢复的影响[J].医学信息,2024,37(23):94-97.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.23.022]
　ZENG Renren.Effect of TAPP and TEP in the Treatment of Adult Inguinal Hernia and its Effect on Postoperative VAS Score and Prognosis Recovery[J].Journal of Medical Information,2024,37(23):94-97.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.23.022]
点击复制

TAPP与TEP治疗成人腹股沟疝的效果及对术后VAS评分和预后恢复的影响()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
37卷
期数:
2024年23期
页码:
94-97
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2024-12-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of TAPP and TEP in the Treatment of Adult Inguinal Hernia and its Effect on Postoperative VAS Score and Prognosis Recovery
文章编号:
1006-1959（2024）23-0094-04
作者:
曾仁仁
南丰县人民医院普外科，江西 南丰 344500
Author(s):
ZENG Renren
General Surgery Department of Nanfeng County People′s Hospital,Nanfeng 344500,Jiangxi,China
关键词:
TAPP; TEP; 成人腹股沟疝; 精索
Keywords:
TAPP; TEP; Adult inguinal hernia; Spermatic cord
分类号:
R656.21
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.23.022
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 研究TAPP与TEP治疗成人腹股沟疝的效果及对术后VAS评分和预后恢复的影响。方法 选取2020年3月-2023年3月在我院诊治的90例成人腹股沟疝患者为研究对象，依据手术类型分为TAPP术组（n=45）和TEP术组（n=45）。比较两组术后VAS评分、手术指标、精索静脉管径、精索静脉血流速度、并发症发生率及复发率。结果 TEP术组术后即刻、术后24 h、术后48 h的VAS评分与TAPP术组比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；TEP术组手术时间、术后住院时间、术后下床活动时间均短于TAPP术组，术中出血量少于 TAPP术组（P＜0.05）；两组术后精索静脉管径增大，静脉血流速度减小，且TEP术组精索静脉管径大于TAPP术组，静脉血流速度小于TAPP术组（P＜0.05）；TEP术组并发症发生率与TAPP术组比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；随访6个月，TEP术组复发率与TAPP术组比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论 TAPP与TEP均可治疗成人腹股沟疝，且安全性、预后均良好。但是TEP手术治疗患者术后恢复快速，同时对精索影响较小，相对具有更优的临床应用价值。
Abstract:
Objective To study the effect of TAPP and TEP in the treatment of adult inguinal hernia and its effect on postoperative VAS score and prognosis recovery.Methods A total of 90 adult patients with inguinal hernia diagnosed and treated in our hospital from March 2020 to March 2023 were selected as the research objects. According to the type of operation, they were divided into TAPP group (n=45) and TEP group (n=45). The postoperative VAS score, surgical index, diameter of spermatic vein, blood flow velocity of spermatic vein, incidence of complications and recurrence rate were compared between the two groups.Results There was no significant difference in VAS scores between the TEP group and the TAPP group immediately after operation, 24 h after operation and 48 h after operation (P>0.05). The operation time, postoperative hospital stay and postoperative ambulation time in the TEP group were shorter than those in the TAPP group, and the intraoperative blood loss was less than that in the TAPP group (P<0.05). The diameter of spermatic vein increased and the velocity of venous blood flow decreased in the two groups after operation, while the diameter of spermatic vein in the TEP group was larger than that in the TAPP group, and the velocity of venous blood flow was lower than that in the TAPP group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the TEP group and the TAPP group (P>0.05). After 6 months of follow-up, there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate between the TEP group and the TAPP group (P>0.05).Conclusion for adult inguinal hernia, both TAPP and TEP have good safety and prognosis. However, TEP surgery has a faster postoperative recovery and less impact on the spermatic cord, which has relatively better clinical application value.

参考文献/References:

[1]龚义军,任军,谢泽民,等.TAPP术治疗成人腹股沟疝的疗效及对其炎性应激及疼痛的影响分析[J].空军医学杂志,2019,35(4):328-330.[2]胡昊勰,吴其肯,夏龙飞,等.疝环充填式无张力疝修补术治疗成年人腹股沟疝的临床效果观察[J].中国基层医药,2020,27(19):2394-2397.[3]鞠雷,魏士博,尚海.腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术与Lichtenstein无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝临床对照研究[J].临床军医杂志,2019,47(7):693-694.[4]唐迎泉,向进见,李键,等.4K高清镜下层面解剖联合TEP治疗老年腹股沟疝的临床效果[J].中国老年学杂志,2022,42(8):1869-1872.[5]薛佩,李绍杰,乐飞,等.新型生物补片在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中临床价值的多中心前瞻性随机对照研究[J].中华消化外科杂志,2023,22(4):532-540.[6]黄磊.Lichtenstein手术在当今腹股沟疝治疗中的地位和再认识[J].外科理论与实践,2021,26(5):386-389.[7]Chen D,Zhang P,Zhang H,et al.Resection of mesothelial cyst of uterine round ligament by laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal procedure alone or combined with open surgery[J].J Int Med Res,2021,47(11):5475-5482.[8]中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组,中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会.腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2021年版)[J].中国实用外科杂志,2021,56(7):495-498.[9]邹永红,田瑞雪.三种成人腹股沟疝术式的疗效及手术对术区术后慢性疼痛影响的比较研究[J].医学临床研究,2021,38(9):1331-1333,1337.[10]刘志宁,程晓虎,余富龙,等.腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术中应用反穿刺侧位布孔法的临床效果[J].安徽医学,2022,43(10):1176-1180.[11]林福利.腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前间隙疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝 685例体会[J].临床外科杂志,2021,29(2):186-187.[12]苟宇峰,张岳,李恒.腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术与经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床疗效观察[J].贵州医药,2021,45(1):69-70.[13]蔡绍海,台德军,姜峰.腹腔镜TAPP和TEP在老年腹股沟疝中的临床应用[J].现代科学仪器,2021,38(6):129-132.[14]魏寇准,余磊,张卫东,等.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝疗效观察[J].皖南医学院学报,2020,39(3):253-255,259.[15]牛斌,仇明洋,李强.改良TEP、TAPP 与Rutkow术式治疗腹股沟疝的疗效及安全性分析[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2021,20(10):1098-1101.[16]王祥东,付笑,刘松.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术对复发性腹股沟疝的近远期疗效分析[J].河北医学,2022,28(9):1534-1537.[17]潘炳权,郁林海,朱海峰,等.经脐入路常规器械腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术[J].中国微创外科杂志,2020,20(2):178-180[18]曹云,田君,彭应勇,等.探讨腹腔镜疝修补术与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的临床疗效[J].吉林医学,2020,41(2):405-406.[19]王伟,赵宇斌.TAPP与传统腹股沟疝无张力修补术对成人腹股沟疝手术应激及疼痛影响的对比研究 [J].医学临床研究,2021,38(4):504-507[20]黄晓丹,马冬华,沈雄飞,等.腹腔镜疝修补术中对单侧腹股沟斜疝两种疝囊处理方法的对比研究[J].重庆医学,2020,49(9):1438-1441.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01