[1]程桂文,刘 红,朱 杭,等.临床护理路径干预模式对耐药肺结核患者护理效果及服药依从性和护理满意度的影响[J].医学信息,2024,37(23):175-178.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.23.041]
 CHENG Guiwen,LIU Hong,ZHU Hang,et al.Effect of Clinical Nursing Pathway Intervention Mode on Nursing Effect, Medication Compliance and Nursing Satisfaction of Patients with Drug-resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis[J].Journal of Medical Information,2024,37(23):175-178.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.23.041]
点击复制

临床护理路径干预模式对耐药肺结核患者护理效果及服药依从性和护理满意度的影响()
分享到:

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
37卷
期数:
2024年23期
页码:
175-178
栏目:
护理研究
出版日期:
2024-12-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of Clinical Nursing Pathway Intervention Mode on Nursing Effect, Medication Compliance and Nursing Satisfaction of Patients with Drug-resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis
文章编号:
1006-1959(2024)23-0175-04
作者:
程桂文刘 红朱 杭梅明星
景德镇第五人民医院供应室,江西 景德镇 333000
Author(s):
CHENG GuiwenLIU HongZHU HangMEI Mingxing
Supply Room,Jingdezhen Fifth People’s Hospital,Jingdezhen 333000,Jiangxi,China
关键词:
临床护理路径耐药肺结核服药依从性
Keywords:
Clinical nursing pathway intervention modelDrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosisMedication compliance
分类号:
R473
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.23.041
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 研究临床护理路径干预模式对耐药肺结核患者护理效果及服药依从性和护理满意度的影响。方法 选取2022年4月-2023年10月在我院诊治的50例耐药肺结核患者为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,各组25例。对照组给予常规护理,观察组给予临床护理路径干预模式。比较两组患者服药依从率、健康教育知识点知晓率、护理满意度及生活质量水平。结果 观察组服药依从性(96.00%)高于对照组(84.00%)(P<0.05);观察组健康教育知识点知晓率(92.00%)高于对照组(80.00%)(P<0.05);观察组护理满意度(100.00%)高于对照组(84.00%)(P<0.05);两组SF-36评分均高于干预前,且观察组高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 临床护理路径干预模式可提高耐药肺结核患者服药依从性、护理满意度、生活质量水平以及健康教育知识点知晓率,具有较理想的护理效果,值得临床加以应用。
Abstract:
Objective To study the effect of clinical nursing pathway intervention mode on nursing effect, medication compliance and nursing satisfaction of patients with drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis.Methods A total of 50 patients with drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis diagnosed and treated in our hospital from April 2022 to October 2023 were selected as the research objects. They were divided into control group and observation group by random number table method, with 25 patients in each group. The control group was given routine nursing, and the observation group was given clinical nursing path intervention mode. The medication compliance rate, awareness rate of health education knowledge points, nursing satisfaction and quality of life were compared between the two groups.Results The medication compliance of the observation group (96.00%) was higher than that of the control group (84.00%) (P<0.05). The awareness rate of health education knowledge points in the observation group (92.00%) was higher than that in the control group (80.00%) (P<0.05). The nursing satisfaction of the observation group (100.00%) was higher than that of the control group (84.00%) (P<0.05). The SF-36 scores of the two groups were higher than those before intervention, and the observation group was higher than the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion The clinical nursing pathway intervention model can improve the medication compliance, nursing satisfaction, quality of life level and health education knowledge awareness rate of patients with drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis. It has an ideal nursing effect and is worthy of clinical application.

参考文献/References:

[1]徐红.肺结核患者用药依从性相关危险因素的调查分析与防护措施[J].护理实践与研究,2020,16(22):70-72.[2]杜一琴,张尊敬,刘忠达,等. 丽水地区耐多药肺结核患者用药依从性及影响因素研究[J].中国预防医学杂志,2020,21(4):68-73.[3]杨薇,吕海瑞.集束化护理对流动人口肺结核患者护理效果的影响[J].检验医学与临床,2020,17(9):1253-1256.[4]安洪霞,杨风勤,陆川,等. QQ群延伸护理服务对结核病患者健康教育的效果分析[J].结核与肺部疾病杂志,2020,1(4):265-269.[5]袁燕.互联网+精准化护理在结核病患者治疗中的应用效果[J].上海医药,2023,44(12):24-27.[6]陈卉,宋雅婷,李涛,等.2016-2020年全国学生耐药肺结核流行特征与治疗转归分析[J].热带病与寄生虫学,2023,21(2):65-71.[7]Yang XW,Lin MH,Jia D,et al.Analysis of drug resistance characteristics in 171 patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis[J].Ningxia Medical Journal,2023,45(2):167-169.[8]李杨,黄佳琪,刘圆圆.耐药肺结核患者采用细节护理管理对用药依从性与疾病认知的促进作用[J].黑龙江中医药,2021,50(4):313-314.[9]徐静,姜爽爽,郑海伦,等.290例耐药肺结核高危人群耐药情况及治疗结果分析[J].中国防痨杂志,2023,45(3):323-327.[10]臧召燕,王伟,沈鑫,等.上海市耐药和非耐药肺结核患者服药依从性分析[J].中国初级卫生保健,2021,35(12):73-76.[11]陈慧娟,郑旭彬,王芸,等.基于肺结核患者耐药风险的筛查策略对耐多药结核病发现效果的评价[J].中华流行病学杂志,2021,42(12):136-138.[12]王胜芬,周杨,欧喜超,等.我国结核病耐药状况:2018年全国结核病耐药监测数据分析[J].辽宁中医药大学学报,2022,44(11):1141-1147.[13]王秀芬,罗莉,余翠英,等.关爱与支持管理模式在耐药结核病患者中的应用效果分析[J].检验医学与临床,2022,19(13):1843-1846.[14]张雪华,李文娟,王海播.循证支持下针对性护理在慢阻肺患者雾化吸入治疗过程中的应用价值[J].中国药物滥用防治杂志,2023,29(11):2060-2062.[15]李春梅,陈延芳,周新磊.个性化耐药结核病全程管理模式的构建及实施效果评价[J].中国慢性病预防与控制,2021,29(2):132-135.[16]姚娟娟,黄双,韦玲玲.以自护需求为基础的强化健康教育模式对肺结核患者认知度、治疗依从性的影响[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2022,28(21):116-118.[17]席明霞,屈婧,肖美慧,等.耐药肺结核患者服药依从性影响因素的质性研究[J].华西医学,2021,36(1):50-54.[18]杜峰莉,胡绢利.健康教育在耐药肺结核护理中的应用效果观察[J].山西医药杂志,2021,50(9):1553-1555.[19]李春梅,陈延芳,周新磊.个性化耐药结核病全程管理模式的构建及实施效果评价[J].中国慢性病预防与控制,2021,29(2):132-135.[20]王秀芬,罗莉,余翠英,等.关爱与支持管理模式在耐药结核病患者中的应用效果分析[J].检验医学与临床,2022,19(13):1843-1846.[21]叶江娥,王静秋,王舰,等.患者关爱与支持管理模式对结核病患者自律性和自我效能的影响[J].结核与肺部疾病杂志,2023,4(3):216-222.

相似文献/References:

[1]张 旭.冠心病心绞痛患者进行护理干预的临床效果及 对护理质量影响研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(05):182.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.068]
 ZHANG Xu.Clinical Effect of Nursing Intervention in Patients with Angina Pectoris of Coronary Heart Disease and its Influence on Nursing Quality[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(23):182.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.068]
[2]詹 红.儿童哮喘临床护理路径变异相关因素的Logstic回归分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(07):175.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.07.062]
 ZHAN Hong.Logstic Regression Analysis of Variation Related Factors of Clinical Nursing Path in Children with Asthma[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(23):175.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.07.062]
[3]吴凌云.临床护理路径在妊娠期糖尿病合并妊娠期高血压患者中的应用[J].医学信息,2019,32(10):181.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.10.061]
 WU Ling-yun.Application of Clinical Nursing Pathway in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Complicated with Gestational Hypertension[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(23):181.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.10.061]
[4]刘婷婷.临床护理路径在老年哮喘患者护理中的有效性及其对生活质量的影响[J].医学信息,2021,34(04):190.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.04.053]
 LIU Ting-ting.The Effectiveness of Clinical Nursing Pathways in the Nursing of Elderly Patientswith Asthma and Its Impact on the Quality of Life[J].Journal of Medical Information,2021,34(23):190.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.04.053]
[5]王 颖,王兰英.临床护理路径对肝硬化并消化道出血患者护理的效果及肝功能的影响[J].医学信息,2021,34(13):181.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.13.051]
 WANG Ying,WANG Lan-ying.The Effect of Clinical Nursing Path on the Nursing Effect and Liver Function of Patients with Liver Cirrhosis and Gastrointestinal Bleeding[J].Journal of Medical Information,2021,34(23):181.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.13.051]
[6]陈淑玲.临床护理路径对冠心病心绞痛患者生活质量的影响[J].医学信息,2021,34(19):178.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.19.049]
 CHEN Shu-ling.Effect of Clinical Nursing Pathway on Quality of Life of Patients withAngina Pectoris of Coronary Heart Disease[J].Journal of Medical Information,2021,34(23):178.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.19.049]
[7]汪正艳.临床护理路径对急性心肌梗死PCI患者并发症及生活质量的影响[J].医学信息,2021,34(19):184.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.19.051]
 WANG Zheng-yan.Effect of Clinical Nursing Pathway on Complications and Quality of Lifeof Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing PCI[J].Journal of Medical Information,2021,34(23):184.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.19.051]
[8]金 磊.临床护理干预化方案对甲状腺肿物切除术效果及并发症的影响[J].医学信息,2022,35(02):181.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.02.048]
 JIN Lei.Effect of Clinical Nursing Intervention on Thyroidectomy and Complications[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(23):181.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.02.048]
[9]刘 斌.临床路径护理对甲状腺手术患者护理满意度及甲状腺手术认知的影响[J].医学信息,2022,35(05):190.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.05.052]
 LIU Bin.Effect of Clinical Pathway Nursing on Nursing Satisfaction and Cognition of Thyroid Surgery Patients[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(23):190.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.05.052]
[10]钟卫卢.临床护理路径在颅内血肿清除术治疗高血压脑出血患者中的应用效果及对并发症的影响[J].医学信息,2023,36(10):183.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.10.042]
 ZHONG Wei-lu.Application Effect of Clinical Nursing Pathway in Patients with Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage Treated by Intracranial Hematoma Evacuation and its Influence on Complications[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(23):183.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.10.042]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01