[1]梁秀静,赵同领.DRG付费管理对广西某三甲医院肺结核患者收治的影响[J].医学信息,2025,38(07):48-51.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2025.07.008]
　LIANG Xiujing,ZHAO Tongling.Effect of DRG Payment Management on the Treatment of Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients in a Tertiary Hospital in Guangxi[J].Journal of Medical Information,2025,38(07):48-51.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2025.07.008]
点击复制

DRG付费管理对广西某三甲医院肺结核患者收治的影响()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
38卷
期数:
2025年07期
页码:
48-51
栏目:
卫生管理信息学
出版日期:
2025-04-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of DRG Payment Management on the Treatment of Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients in a Tertiary Hospital in Guangxi
文章编号:
1006-1959（2025）07-0048-04
作者:
梁秀静1; 赵同领2
广西医科大学信息与管理学院1，发展规划处2，广西 南宁 530021
Author(s):
LIANG Xiujing1;  ZHAO Tongling2
School of Information and Management1, Development Planning Division2, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, China
关键词:
DRG; 付费改革; 肺结核; 防治; 广西
Keywords:
DRG;  Payment reform;  Pulmonary tuberculosis;  Prevention and treatment;  Guangxi
分类号:
R197
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2025.07.008
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 分析广西某三甲肺结核定点收治医院DRG付费改革实施前后肺结核住院患者情况，为广西肺结核防治提供参考。方法 采用描述性统计分析法，筛选广西某三甲肺结核定点收治医院2018-2023年住院患者数据，从肺结核住院患者数量变化趋势、患者年龄、分布地区、平均住院日、平均住院费用分析DRG付费管理对肺结核收治的影响。结果 DRG改革前肺结核患者平均住院日15.48 d，年均增长率0.42%；平均住院费用17 830.42元，年均增长率3.39%；其中肺结核外科治疗组平均住院费用23 163.28元，年均增长率7.59%，肺结核内科治疗组平均住院费用12 497.57，年均增长率为1.25%。改革后肺结核患者平均住院日13.38 d，年均增长率-1.98%；平均住院费用12 379.59元，年均增长率-13.52%；肺结核外科治疗组平均住院费用13 358.09元，年均增长率-20.32%；肺结核内科治疗组平均住院费用11 401.08元，年均增长率-6.25%。结论 DRG付费改革后平均住院日下降，医疗服务效率提升，平均住院费用下降，控费效果显著。DRG付费改革对收治患者的年龄分布和来源地无明显影响。
Abstract:
Objective To analyze the situation of hospitalized patients with pulmonary tuberculosis before and after the implementation of DRG payment reform in a tertiary tuberculosis designated hospital in Guangxi, and to provide reference for the prevention and treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis in Guangxi. Methods Descriptive statistical analysis was used to screen the data of hospitalized patients from 2018 to 2023 in a designated hospital for pulmonary tuberculosis in Guangxi. The influence of DRG payment management on the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis was analyzed from the trend of the number of hospitalized patients with pulmonary tuberculosis, the age of patients, the distribution area, the average hospitalization days and the average hospitalization expenses. Results Before the DRG reform, the average hospitalization days of pulmonary tuberculosis patients were 15.48 days, with an average annual growth rate of 0.42%; the average hospitalization expenses were 17 830.42 yuan, with an average annual growth rate of 3.39%; among them, the average hospitalization cost of the surgical treatment group of pulmonary tuberculosis was 23 163.28 yuan, with an average annual growth rate of 7.59%; the average hospitalization cost of the medical treatment group of pulmonary tuberculosis was 12 497.57, with an average annual growth rate of 1.25%. After the reform, the average hospitalization days of pulmonary tuberculosis patients were 13.38 days, with an average annual growth rate of-1.98%; the average hospitalization cost was 12 379.59 yuan, with an average annual growth rate of -13.52%; the average hospitalization cost of the surgical treatment group of pulmonary tuberculosis was 13 358.09 yuan, with an average annual growth rate of-20.32%; the average hospitalization cost of the pulmonary tuberculosis medical treatment group was 11 401.08 yuan, with an average annual growth rate of 6.25%. Conclusion After the DRG payment reform, the average hospitalization days has decreased, the efficiency of medical services has improved, the average hospitalization expense has decreased, and the cost control effect is significant. DRG payment reform has no significant effect on the age distribution and source of patients.

参考文献/References:

[1]Gao JT,Liu YH.Key points of the 2020 WHO global tuberculosis report[J].J Hebei Med Univ,2021,42(1):1-6.[2]童广清,莫晨玲,吉虹玲.老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并肺结核40例患者临床分析[J].青海医药杂志,2022,52(3):17-20.[3]世界卫生组织.2023年世界卫生组织全球结核病报告[R].日内瓦:世界卫生组织,2023.[4]万彬,周怡彤,王滢鹏,等.基于DRG的医保服务质量评价体系构建及应用研究[J].中国医院管理,2024,44(1):83-86.[5]杨鸿洋,吕婕,翟晓婷,等.医疗保险支付方式改革背景下大型公立医院发展策略[J].中国卫生资源,2020,23(3):254-257.[6]朱佳英,高奇隆,任晋文,等.DRG支付在公立医院高质量发展中的功能探析[J].卫生经济研究,2021,38(12):57-61.[7]刘庆,王清亮,胡耀斌,等.新医改条件下缩短平均住院日的综合效益分析[J].中国卫生事业管理,2017,33(6):423-424,460.[8]郑琼.我院2016-2020年出院患者平均住院日及相关指标变化分析[J].中医药管理杂志,2022,30(3):69-70.[9]国务院办公厅.国务院办公厅关于加强三级公立医院绩效考核工作的意见(国办发[2019]号)[EB/OL].(2019-01-16)[2023-07-28].https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2019/content_5366476.htm.[10]国家卫生健康委办公厅.国家卫生健康委办公厅关于印发《国家三级公立医院绩效考核操作手册（2023版）的通知》[EB/OL].(2023-02-27)[2023-11-08].https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2023-03/02/content_5744105.htm.[11]陈朝晋,吕传爱,胡旭东,等.DRG支付下肿瘤专科医院管理模式变化探讨与分析[J].中国医院,2023,27(1):93-95.[12]明星宇,杨练,孙群,等.空间视角下的人均住院费用影响因素研究[J].中国卫生事业管理,2022,39(11):819-839.[13]李雅萍,张淑琴.CHS-DRG 付费对冠脉支架手术患者住院费用的改革效果分析[J].中国病案,2024,25(5):55-58.[14]方金鸣,刘玲,彭义香,等.CHS-DRG支付改革对医院运行的影响分析[J].卫生经济研究,2022,39(5):67-71,74.[15]杜会征,焦卫平.北京某院DRGs付费改革实施效果分析—以经皮冠状动脉支架植入病组为例[J].卫生软科学,2023,37(2):11-13.[16]王文娟,陈心怡,蔡媛青,等.北京市医药分开与医耗联动综合改革对 DRG试点医院住院费用的影响研究[J].中国卫生经济,2023,42(1):19-24,28.[17]杨琳,朱兆芳,崔斌,等.基于DRG付费的经皮冠状动脉支架植入病组住院患者费用结构变化的影响研究[J].中国卫生经济,2023,42(10):29-32.

相似文献/References:

[1]王栎垚,毛国育.公立A医院运用DRG对临床科室的运营管理研究[J].医学信息,2023,36(04):52.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.04.010]
　WANG Li-yao,MAO Guo-yu.Research on the Operation and Management of Clinical Departments by DRG in Public A Hospital[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(07):52.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.04.010]
[2]余沛林,陈博年,崔宇菁,等.DRG付费模式下颅内出血住院费用影响因素的研究[J].医学信息,2025,38(03):54.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2025.03.010]
　YU Peilin,CHEN Bonian,CUI Yujing,et al.A Study of Effect Factors of Hospitalization Expense with Intracranial Hemorrhage Under DRGs Payment Model[J].Journal of Medical Information,2025,38(07):54.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2025.03.010]
[3]张文倩,杨 茹,陈姿羽,等.DRG对某三级老年病医院运营管理的影响[J].医学信息,2025,38(03):76.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2025.03.014]
　ZHANG Wenqian,YANG Ru,CHEN Ziyu,et al.Influence of DRG on the Operation and Management of a Tertiary Geriatric Hospital[J].Journal of Medical Information,2025,38(07):76.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2025.03.014]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01