[1]涂 阳.双切口双钢板内固定与单侧锁定钢板内固定对胫骨平台骨折患者膝关节内翻角、后倾角的影响[J].医学信息,2025,38(08):100-104.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2025.08.020]
　TU Yang.Effect of Double Incision Double Plate Internal Fixation and Unilateral Locking Plate Internal Fixation on Knee Varus Angle and Posterior Slope Angle in Patients with Tibial Plateau Fracture[J].Journal of Medical Information,2025,38(08):100-104.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2025.08.020]
点击复制

双切口双钢板内固定与单侧锁定钢板内固定对胫骨平台骨折患者膝关节内翻角、后倾角的影响()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
38卷
期数:
2025年08期
页码:
100-104
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2025-04-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of Double Incision Double Plate Internal Fixation and Unilateral Locking Plate Internal Fixation on Knee Varus Angle and Posterior Slope Angle in Patients with Tibial Plateau Fracture
文章编号:
1006-1959（2025）08-0100-05
作者:
涂 阳
弋阳县人民医院骨科，江西 弋阳 334400
Author(s):
TU Yang
Orthopedics Department of Yiyang County People’s Hospital, Yiyang 334400, Jiangxi, China
关键词:
双切口双钢板内固定; 单侧锁定钢板内固定; 胫骨平台骨折; 内翻角; 后倾角
Keywords:
Double incision double plate internal fixation;  Unilateral locking plate internal fixation;  Tibial plateau fracture;  Pronation angle;  Caster angle
分类号:
R687.3
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2025.08.020
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 比较双切口双钢板内固定与单侧锁定钢板内固定对胫骨平台骨折患者膝关节内翻角、后倾角的影响。方法 选取弋阳县人民医院2021年5月-2023年8月收治的胫骨平台骨折患者62例作为研究对象，根据随机数字表法将其分为对照组与研究组，每组31例。对照组给予单侧锁定钢板内固定术治疗，研究组采用双切口双钢板内固定术治疗。比较两组手术及恢复指标（手术时间、术中出血量、切口长度、术后引流量、骨折愈合时间、下床时间、住院时间）、膝关节功能（疼痛、功能、活动度、肌力、屈膝畸形、稳定性）、膝关节功能优良率、膝关节内翻角及后倾角、生活质量（躯体疼痛、情感职能、生理功能、社会功能）。结果 研究组手术时间长于对照组，而术中出血量、切口长度、术后引流量、骨折愈合时间、下床时间、住院时间均低于对照组（P＜0.05）；研究组治疗后膝关节功能评分高于对照组（P＜0.05）。研究组膝关节功能优良率为96.77%，对照组膝关节功能优良率为74.19%，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。研究组治疗后膝关节内翻角、后倾角均低于对照组（P＜0.05）。研究组治疗后生活质量评分高于对照组（P＜0.05）。结论 双切口双钢板内固定治疗胫骨平台骨折患者的效果更为确切，能够促进患者康复，提高患者膝关节功能以及生活质量，改善患者膝关节内翻角、后倾角，值得临床应用。
Abstract:
Objective To compare the effects of double incision double plate internal fixation and unilateral locking plate internal fixation on knee varus angle and posterior slope angle in patients with tibial plateau fractures. Methods A total of 62 patients with tibial plateau fractures admitted to Yiyang County People’s Hospital from May 2021 to August 2023 were selected as the research objects. According to the random number table method, they were divided into control group and study group, with 31 patients in each group. The control group was treated with unilateral locking plate internal fixation, and the study group was treated with double incision double plate internal fixation. The operation and recovery indexes (operation time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, postoperative drainage volume, fracture healing time, ambulation time, hospitalization time), knee function (pain, function, activity, muscle strength, flexion deformity, stability), excellent and good rate of knee function, knee pronation angle and caster angle, quality of life (physical pain, emotional function, physiological function, social function) were compared between the two groups. Results The operation time of the study group was longer than that of the control group, while the intraoperative blood loss, incision length, postoperative drainage volume, fracture healing time, ambulation time and hospitalization time were lower than those of the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, the knee function score of the study group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). The excellent and good rate of knee joint function in the study group was 96.77%, and the excellent and good rate of knee joint function in the control group was 74.19%, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). After treatment, the knee pronation angle and caster angle of the study group were lower than those of the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, the quality of life scores of the study group were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Double incision double plate internal fixation is more effective in the treatment of patients with tibial plateau fractures, which can promote the rehabilitation of patients, improve their knee joint function and quality of life, as well as the knee joint varus angle and posterior slope angle. It is worthy of clinical application.

参考文献/References:

[1]贾建国,朱立帆,沈鹏程,等.双切口双侧钢板与单侧锁定钢板内固定治疗SchatzkerV型胫骨平台骨折的疗效[J].局解手术学杂志,2023,32(1):61-65.[2]丁伟,王小军,封小东.复杂胫骨平台骨折双切口双钢板内固定术的疗效[J].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2020,14(3):320-323.[3]李小斌,程俊文,行斌斌,等.膝内外侧双切口双钢板内固定术在复杂胫骨平台骨折治疗中的应用价值[J].中国基层医药,2019,26(14):1758-1761.[4]田海林,卢进,沈阳.不同固定方式治疗复杂胫骨平台骨折的疗效分析[J].临床外科杂志,2020,28(4):326-330.[5]徐磊,石兴雷,韩玉虎,等.单与双钢板内固定治疗复杂胫骨平台骨折比较[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2020,28(12):1081-1084.[6]吴多庆,贾瑞鹏,范忠诚.双切口双钢板内固定在老年胫骨平台骨折中应用效果及对稳定性、骨代谢的影响[J].中国老年学杂志,2021,41(5):992-995.[7]黄海波,林作华,黄志伟.双切口双钢板内固定治疗复杂胫骨平台骨折的疗效及对患肢负重时间的影响[J].海南医学,2019,30(17):2226-2229.[8]冯振中,李勇,康中山.双切口双钢板置入内固定治疗Ⅳ、Ⅴ、Ⅵ型胫骨平台骨折的回顾性研究[J].创伤外科杂志,2018,20(10):740-743.[9]白晓兵,任龙龙,路星.锁定钢板与双切口双钢板内固定治疗复杂性胫骨平台骨折的疗效比较[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2018,17(16):1754-1757.[10]张振君,白伦浩.膝前正中直切口与膝内外侧双切口双钢板内固定术对复杂胫骨平台骨折患者膝关节功能的影响比较[J].中国基层医药,2020,27(17):2049-2053.[11]韩申,刘文德.续骨活血汤内服联合熏洗治疗复杂胫骨平台骨折双切口双钢板内固定术后临床研究[J].新中医,2020,52(7):91-93.[12]任戈亮,余承保,朱玉洲,等.双切口3至4块钢板固定治疗累及后内侧柱的复杂胫骨平台骨折15例疗效分析[J].安徽医药,2018,22(8):1548-1550.[13]杨永强,霍玉龙.膝关节内外侧双切口双钢板复位内固定术治疗复杂胫骨平台骨折80例[J].山西医药杂志,2019,48(11):1305-1307.[14]李东阳,张堃,李大双,等.内侧支撑钢板及排钉固定治疗累及后外侧SchatzkerⅣ型胫骨平台骨折的疗效分析[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2022,24(10):874-878.[15]翟启麟,庄健,杨军,等.两种手术入路治疗累及后外侧SchatzkerⅣ型胫骨平台骨折的临床效果比较[J].同济大学学报(医学版),2022,43(6):834-840.[16]王友良,冯庆虎,衣龙云,等.前正中入路双钢板固定在Schatzker分型Ⅴ、Ⅵ型胫骨平台骨折中的研究应用[J].生物骨科材料与临床研究,2021,18(1):43-46,50.[17]易刚,张磊,扶世杰,等.双钢板固定结合奥邦植骨材料与自体髂骨植骨治疗复杂胫骨平台骨折的比较[J].中国组织工程研究,2019,23(16):2486-2492.[18]亢世杰,胡义明,鲍飞龙,等.双反牵引、微创复位及raft技术治疗后内及后外侧胫骨平台骨折[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2018,4(5):261-265.[19]邓乐章,许勇,周容华.双侧锁定钢板联合硫酸钙半水化合物植骨材料治疗复杂型胫骨平台骨折[J].中国临床研究,2018,31(3):403-406.[20]马海召,冯新霞,陈晓华,等.单纯T形钢板与双支撑钢板治疗后外侧胫骨平台骨折的疗效分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2019,34(2):185-187.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01