[1]薛娇妍,唐永利.改良ERAS方案对膝关节置换患者围手术期的效果观察[J].医学信息,2018,31(23):164-167.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.23.048]
　XUE Jiao-yan,TANG Yong-li.The Effect of Modified ERAS Scheme in Perioperative Period of Knee Joint Replacement Patients was Observed[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(23):164-167.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.23.048]
点击复制

改良ERAS方案对膝关节置换患者围手术期的效果观察()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
31卷
期数:
2018年23期
页码:
164-167
栏目:
护理研究
出版日期:
2018-12-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Effect of Modified ERAS Scheme in Perioperative Period of Knee Joint Replacement Patients was Observed
文章编号:
1006-1959（2018）23-0164-04
作者:
薛娇妍; 唐永利
重庆医科大学附属第一医院骨科，重庆 400016
Author(s):
XUE Jiao-yan; TANG Yong-li
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University,Chongqing 400016,China
关键词:
快速康复外科; 膝关节置换; 住院时间
Keywords:
Rapid rehabilitation surgery; Knee replacement; Hospital stay
分类号:
R687.4；R441.1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.23.048
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
探讨一种改良ERAS方案对初次膝关节置换患者住院时间的影响。方法 回顾性分析2015年8月~2017年8月我院收治的行初次膝关节置换患者252例，围手术期分别采用常规ERAS方案（ERAS组，126例）和改良ERAS方案（ERAS改良组，126例），分析两组患者术后住院时间、出院后自理能力、术后VAS评分、阿片类药物使用量、30 d内再入院率、院内跌倒、围手术期输血、术后恶心发生率、术后平地步行距离等指标。结果 ERAS改良组患者平均住院时间为（56.10±16.51）h，短于ERAS组的（76.60±18.91）h，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。ERAS改良组中41.27%的患者在出院后就能够基本生活自理，而ERAS组中只有21.43%的患者能够在出院后生活自理，更多的患者出院后还需要额外的家庭护理（P＜0.05）。ERAS改良组患者术后当天VAS评分高于ERAS组，术后1 d、2 d VAS评分低于ERAS组，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。术后第1天和第2天，改良ERAS组阿片类药物使用量和出现恶心的发生率均低于ERAS组，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。两组患者30 d内再入院率和院内跌倒率比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。改良ERAS组患者在围手术期输血率低于常规ERAS组（P＜0.05）。术后当天、第1天和第2天，改良ERAS组平地步行距离均优于ERAS组（P＜0.05）。结论 改良ERAS方案能明显缩短初次膝关节置换患者住院时间，节约医疗费用。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the effect of an improved ERAS scheme on hospitalization time of patients with primary knee arthroplasty. Methods A retrospective analysis from August 2015 to August 2017 line of our hospital, 252 patients with primary knee arthroplasties, perioperative respectively using conventional scheme(ERAS group, 126 cases) and the improvement scheme (ERAS improved group, 126 cases), compared two groups of patients with postoperative hospital stay, postoperative self-care ability, after discharge VAS score, opioid usage within 30 d, readmission rate, in the fall, perioperative blood transfusion and postoperative incidence of nausea, postoperative walking distance index. Results The average hospitalization time in the modified group was (56.1±16.5) h, which was shorter than that in the ERAS group (76.6±18.9),the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). In the ERAS improved group, 41.27% of the patients in the ERAS improved group were able to live and take care of themselves after discharge, while only 21.43% of the patients in the ERAS improved group were able to live and take care of themselves after discharge, and more patients needed additional home care after discharge (P<0.05). The VAS score of the modified group was higher than that of the ERAS group on the postoperative day, and the VAS score of the 1 d and 2 d postoperative days was lower than that of the ERAS group, with statistically significant difference (P<0.05). On the first and second days after surgery, the ERAS in the modified group had a lower incidence of opioid use and nausea than the ERAS in the modified group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in readmission rate and nosocomial fall rate between the two groups within 30 d (P>0.05). The perioperative transfusion rate in the modified ERAS group was lower than that in the conventional ERAS group (P<0.05). The pedestrian distance in the improved ERAS group was superior to that in the ERAS group on the day, day 1 and day 2 after surgery (P<0.05). Conclusion The modified ERAS scheme can significantly shorten the hospitalization time of patients with primary knee arthroplasty and save medical costs.

参考文献/References:

[1]Losina E,Thornhill TS,Rome BN,et al.The dramatic increase in total knee replacement utilization rates in the United States cannot be fully explained by growth in population size and the obesity epidemic[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2012,94(3):201-207.
[2]Weinstein AM,Rome BN,Reichmann WM,et al.Estimating the burden of total knee replacement in the United States[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2013,95(5):385-392.
[3]张竞张,金庆,金贺楠,等.全膝关节置换术与膝关节单髁术置换患者住院费用构成比较[J].临床军医杂志,2017,27(8):870-871.
[4]Healy WL,Rana AJ,Iorio R.Hospital economics of primary total knee arthroplasty at a teaching hospital[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,2011,469(1):87-94.
[5]Lovald ST,Ong KL,Malkani AL,et al.Complications,mortality, and costs for outpatient and short-stay total knee arthroplasty patients in comparison to standard-stay patients[J].J Arthroplasty,2014,29(3):510-515.
[6]Hanson NA,Allen CJ,Hostetter LS,et al.Continuous ultrasound-guided adductor canal block for total knee arthroplasty:a randomized,double-blind trial[J].Anesth Analg,2014,118(6):1370-1377.
[7]汪洋,刘义,超马骏.全膝关节置换临床路径与效果分析[J].中国组织工程研究,2015,19(9):1340-1344.
[8]Faggiano F,Sermeus W,Van HP,et al.Effects of clinical pathways in the joint replacement:a meta-analysis[J].BMC Medicine,2009,7(1):1-11.
[9]Cram P,Lu X,Kates SL,et al.Total knee arthroplasty volume, utilization, and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries,1991-2010[J].JAMA,2012,308(12):1227-1236.

相似文献/References:

[1]王 疆,殷积慧.收肌管阻滞与关节腔周围注射在膝关节置换术后的镇痛效果比较[J].医学信息,2019,32(07):123.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.07.037]
　WANG Jiang,YIN Ji-hui.Comparison of Analgesic Effect Between Myocardium Block And Periarticular Injection After Knee Joint Replacement[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(23):123.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.07.037]
[2]徐 伟,杨迎春,陈艳蓉,等.经后颅窝乙状窦后入路三叉神经微血管减压术的快速康复外科护理[J].医学信息,2020,33(01):182.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.01.061]
　XU Wei,YANG Ying-chun,CHEN Yan-rong,et al.Fast Track Surgery Nursing of Trigeminal Nerve Microvascular Decompression Via Posterior Cranial Fossa Posterior Sigmoid Sinus Approach[J].Journal of Medical Information,2020,33(23):182.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.01.061]
[3]胡金灵.多学科团队-加速康复外科模式在肝胆外科中的应用[J].医学信息,2022,35(07):112.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.07.027]
　HU Jin-ling.Application of Multidisciplinary Team-enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(23):112.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.07.027]

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-12-17