[1]余 娜.临床尿液常规检验的质量控制分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(03):156-158.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.03.057]
　YU Na.Analysis on Quality Control of Routine Test of Clinical Urine[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(03):156-158.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.03.057]
点击复制

临床尿液常规检验的质量控制分析()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
31卷
期数:
2018年03期
页码:
156-158
栏目:
诊疗技术
出版日期:
2018-02-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis on Quality Control of Routine Test of Clinical Urine
文章编号:
1006-1959（2018）03-0156-03
作者:
余 娜
辽宁省灯塔市中心医院检验科，辽宁 灯塔 111300
Author(s):
YU Na
Department of Laboratory,Liaoning Provincial Dengta Center Hospital,Dengta 111300,Liaoning,China
关键词:
尿液常规检验; 质量控制; 效果分析
Keywords:
Urine routine examination; Quality control; Effect analysis
分类号:
R446.12
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.03.057
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 分析在临床尿液常规检验中加强质量控制的效果。方法 选取我院检验科2014年1月~2017年12月210例尿液样本，随机分为观察组和对照组，每组105例。对照组采用常规尿液检验法，分析不合格率；观察组在对照组基础上重点加强质量控制工作。对比两组标本的不合格率和出现不合格标本的原因。结果 对照组不合格率为14.29%，高于观察组的0.95%，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。总共出现16例不合格的情况，导致出现不合格标本出现的主要原因是标本污染5例（31.25%）、标本量不足5例（31.25%）、标本标记不清3例（18.75%）、容器不合格2例（12.50%）、超时送检1例（6.25%）。结论 临床尿液常规检验的质量控制可减少不合格样本的发生，为临床的诊断与治疗提供有价值参考。
Abstract:
Objective To analyze the effect of enhancing quality control in clinical urine tests.Methods From January 2014 to December 2017, 210 urine samples were randomly divided into observation group and control group，105 cases in each group.In the control group,routine urine test was used to analyze the unqualified rate.Observation group on the basis of the control group to strengthen quality control work.Compared the two groups of specimens of non-qualified and the causes of unqualified specimens.Results The control group failed rate was 14.29%,higher than the observation group 0.95%,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).A total of 16 cases of unqualified cases occurred.The main causes of unqualified samples were the specimen contamination in 5 cases(31.25%),specimen less than 5 cases(31.25%), specimen undetectable in 3 cases(18.75%),2 cases failed(12.50%),overtime submission in 1 case(6.25%).Conclusion The quality control of routine urine tests can reduce the occurrence of unqualified samples and provide valuable reference for clinical diagnosis and treatment.

参考文献/References:

[1]张静.临床尿液常规检验分析前质量控制对策与效果观察[J].中外医疗,2015,34(02):178-179.
[2]林律初,江炎章.临床医学检验中血液细胞检验的质量控制方法探讨[J].中国医学工程,2015(04):160,163.
[3]邵桂英.临床尿液常规检验分析前质量控制对策与效果探析[J].中外医疗,2015,34(13):182-183.
[4]莫尚鹏.分析前质量控制在临床尿液常规检验中的临床效果评价[J].现代诊断与治疗,2015,26(22):5158-5159.
[5]李正凯,赵丽影.分析临床尿液常规检验中质量控制的对策与效果[J].中国卫生标准管理,2016,7(04):157-158.
[6]罗兴利,李淑琴.分析前质量控制在临床尿液常规检验中的应用[J].中国处方药,2016,14(07):134-135.
[7]陈建国.尿液常规检验中分析前质量控制的临床效果及应用价值分析[J].数理医药学杂志,2015,28(07):1005-1006.
[8]李汴霞.探讨临床尿液常规检验分析前的质量控制[J].中国卫生产业,2013(26):150,152.
[9]刘敏.分析前质量控制在临床尿液常规检验中的应用[J].中国处方药,2016,14(07):134-135.

相似文献/References:

[1]田维科,雷 蓉,李 芸,等.健康管理服务质量控制的现状与思考[J].医学信息,2019,32(08):39.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.08.013]
　TIAN Wei-ke,LEI Rong,LIYun,et al.Status of Health Service Quality Control Management and Thinking[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(03):39.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.08.013]
[2]李 岩.2016~2018年天津市职业病危害因素现场检测状况调查[J].医学信息,2020,33(07):129.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.07.041]
　Li Yan.Investigation on the Status of on-site Detection of Occupational Hazards in Tianjin from 2016 to 2018[J].Journal of Medical Information,2020,33(03):129.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.07.041]
[3]王 瑶,陈 慧,林 莉,等.重大传染病一级预检分诊持续质量控制[J].医学信息,2021,34(01):134.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.01.036]
　WANG Yao,CHEN Hui,LIN Li,et al.Continuous Quality Control of First-level Pre-Examination and Triage of Serious Infectious Diseases[J].Journal of Medical Information,2021,34(03):134.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.01.036]
[4]汪蓓蕾,侯秉璋,郭 刚.Westgard西格玛规则和生物学变异确定的质量规范在新生儿筛查项目中的应用[J].医学信息,2022,35(02):105.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.02.025]
　WANG Bei-lei,HOU Bing-zhang,GUO Gang.Application of Westgard Sigma Rules and Quality Criteria for Biological Variantsin Neonatal Screening Projects[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(03):105.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.02.025]

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-02-01