[1]欧阳如刚.微创与保守治疗腰间盘突出的效果分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(04):179-180,183.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.04.068]
　OUYANG-Rugang.Analysis of the Effect of Minimally Invasive and Conservative Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(04):179-180,183.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.04.068]
点击复制

微创与保守治疗腰间盘突出的效果分析()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
31卷
期数:
2018年04期
页码:
179-180,183
栏目:
出版日期:
2018-02-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of the Effect of Minimally Invasive and Conservative Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation
文章编号:
1006-1959（2018）04-0179-03
作者:
欧阳如刚
天津海滨人民医院骨科，天津 300280
Author(s):
OUYANG-Rugang
Department of Orthopaedics,Tianjin Coastal People's Hospital,Tianjin 300280,China
关键词:
腰间盘突出; 微创治疗; 保守治疗
Keywords:
Key words：Disc herniation; Minimally invasive treatment; Conservative treatment
分类号:
R68
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.04.068
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨微创与保守治疗腰间盘突出两组对比治疗的临床效果。方法 收集我院2015年1月~2017年6月收治的100例腰间盘突出患者，取随机数字排序分为对照组与观察组，每组50例，比较两组治疗效果及治疗前后VAS评分。结果 对照组总有效率82.00%低于观察组96.00%，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；两组患者在治疗前VAS评分差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05），观察组治疗后VAS评分（4.03±0.57）低于对照组（5.21±0.62）分，差异存在统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 微创与保守治疗腰间盘突出两组均有效果，但是微创方式治疗效果更明显，能有效减轻患者疼痛感，具有明显优势。
Abstract:
Abstract：Objective To explore the clinical effect of two groups of minimally invasive and conservative treatment of lumbar disc herniation.Methods A total of 100 patients with lumbar disc herniation admitted to our hospital from January 2015 to June 2017 were collected and randomly divided into control group and observation group,50 cases in each group.The treatment effect and VAS score before and after treatment in two groups were compared.Results The total effective rate of the control group was 82.00% lower than that of the observation group 96.00%,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the VAS score between the two groups before treatment(P>0.05),the VAS score of the observation group(4.03±0.57)was lower than that of the control group(5.21±0.62),and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Both minimally invasive and conservative treatment of lumbar disc herniation are effective,but the minimally invasive treatment is more effective and can effectively relieve the pain of the patients.It has obvious advantages.

参考文献/References:

[1]李树东,王树海,纪福利.椎间孔镜微创手术与传统手术治疗腰间盘突出的临床效果[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2017,4(3):451.
[2]黄奇峰.探讨腰间盘突出患者采用微创治疗的临床效果[J].转化医学电子杂志,2015,2(08):54.
[3]Khashan M,Lidar Z,Salame K,et al.Minimally invasive spinal decompression in patients older than 75 years of age:Perioperative risks,complications and clinical outcomes compared with patients younger than 45 years of age[J].World Neurosurgery,2016,89(Fasc.3):337-342.
[4]邵超,张晶晶,凌飞海,等.经乳晕切口治疗乳腺良性疾病中麦默通微创旋切系统与传统手术的临床效果对比[J].实用医学杂志,2015,23(7):1142-1144.
[5]沈皆亮,郝杰,何斌.不伴神经损伤的胸腰椎爆裂骨折保守和手术治疗效果对比:一项荟萃分析[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2017,25(2):126-131.
[6]Shin J S,Lee J,Lee Y J,et al.Long-Term Course of Alternative and Integrative Therapy for Lumbar Disc Herniation and Risk Factors for Surgery:A Prospective Observational 5-Year Follow-Up Study[J].Spine,2016,41(16):1.
[7]Zhou H,Sun Y,Zhang F,et al.Clinical Case Report of Expansive Laminoplasty for Cervical Myelopathy Due to Both Disc Herniation and Developmental Cervical Spinal Canal Stenosis in Older Adolescents[J].Medicine,2016,95(8):e2879.
[8]郑军,甄志勇,党涛.高血压脑出血患者的微创手术及开颅血肿清除术治疗效果比较[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2016,11(s1):255-256.
[9]潘玉林.腰间盘突出合并骨性椎管狭窄采用微创臭氧治疗的临床效果分析[J].中国卫生产业,2014,11(18):124-125.

相似文献/References:

[1]张立杰.微创治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的研究进展[J].医学信息,2020,33(10):55.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.10.016]
　ZHANG Li-jie.Research Progress of Minimally Invasive Treatment of Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures[J].Journal of Medical Information,2020,33(04):55.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.10.016]
[2]张立杰.闭合复位经皮加压空心钉内固定治疗桡骨远端不稳定性骨折的疗效[J].医学信息,2020,33(14):100.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.14.029]
　ZHANG Li-jie.Therapeutic Effect of Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Compression Hollow Nail Internal Fixation on Unstable Fracture of Distal Radius[J].Journal of Medical Information,2020,33(04):100.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.14.029]
[3]孟 雪,吴婷婷,肖 毓,等.恶性食管瘘治疗现状的研究[J].医学信息,2022,35(02):43.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.02.011]
　MENG Xue,WU Ting-ting,XIAO Yu,et al.Study on Treatment of Malignant Esophageal Fistula[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(04):43.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.02.011]

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-02-15