[1]袁 会,杜 洋,李 慧,等.童年虐待及应对方式与强迫症的关联研究[J].医学信息,2019,32(03):89-92.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.03.027]
　YUAN Hui,DU Yang,LI Hui,et al.Association Study between Childhood Abuse and Coping Style and Obsessive-compulsive Disorder[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(03):89-92.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.03.027]
点击复制

童年虐待及应对方式与强迫症的关联研究()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
32卷
期数:
2019年03期
页码:
89-92
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2019-02-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Association Study between Childhood Abuse and Coping Style and Obsessive-compulsive Disorder
文章编号:
1006-1959（2019）03-0089-04
作者:
袁 会; 杜 洋; 李 慧; 马莉莉; 季益富
（安徽省精神卫生中心/合肥市第四人民医院精神科，安徽 合肥 230022）
Author(s):
YUAN Hui; DU Yang; LI Hui; MA Li-li; JI Yi-fu
(Department of Psychiatry,Anhui Mental Health Center/the Fourth People's Hospital of Hefei,Hefei 230022,Anhui,China)
关键词:
迫症; 童年虐待; 应对方式; CTQ; SCSQ; Y-BOCS
Keywords:
Obsessive-compulsive disorder; Childhood abuse; Coping style; CTQ; SCSQ; Y-BOCS
分类号:
R749.7
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.03.027
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨童年虐待和应对方式与强迫症的相关性。方法 选取60例安徽省精神卫生中心门诊及住院强迫症患者作为研究组，以54例年龄、性别、教育年限匹配的成年人作为对照组，采用儿童期虐待问卷（CTQ）、简易应对方式问卷（SCSQ）、耶鲁-布朗强迫量表（Y-BOCS）对研究组和对照组进行施测并比较。结果 ①在童年虐待上，研究组各维度得分和总分均高于对照组，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；在应对方式上，研究组在积极应对方式上得分均低于对照组，在消极应对方式上得分高于对照组，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。②在童年期虐待和应对方式分布上，研究组有童年期虐待经历组38例（76.00%），无童年期虐待经历22例（34.44%）；积极应对方式组23例（33.82%），消极应对方式组37例（80.43%），差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。③强迫障碍患者研究组中，积极应对方式与情感虐待、躯体虐待、性虐待、情感忽视存在显著负相关（P＜0.01）；消极应对方式与情感虐待、性虐待存在正相关（P＜0.05）。④在控制性别、年龄、教育年限后，消极应对方式组中，有童年期虐待的OR为6.012，而积极应对方式组中，有童年期虐待的OR仅为2.604。结论 积极应对方式是强迫症的保护性因素，而消极应对方式、童年期虐待是强迫症的危险因素。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the correlation between childhood abuse and coping style and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Methods A total of 60 outpatients and inpatients with obsessive-compulsive disorder in Anhui mental health center were selected as the study group. 54 adults with age, sex and education years were selected as the control group. The Childhood Abuse Questionnaire (CTQ) and the Simple Coping Style Questionnaire were used(SCSQ), Yale-Brown Forced Force Scale (Y-BOCS) were tested and compared between the study group and the control group. Results ①In the childhood abuse, the scores and total scores of the study group were higher than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). In the coping style, the research group scored lower on the positive coping style than the control group. The scores on the negative coping style were higher than the control group,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). ②In the distribution of childhood abuse and coping style, the study group had 38 cases of childhood abuse experience (76.00%), 22 cases of childhood abuse (34.44%), and 23 cases of positive coping style (33.82%),there were 37 cases (80.43%) in the negative coping style group,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).③In the study group of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder, there was a significant negative correlation between positive coping style and emotional abuse, physical abuse, sexual abuse and emotional neglect (P<0.01). There was a positive correlation between negative coping style and emotional abuse and sexual abuse (P<0.05).④After controlling for gender, age, and years of education, in the negative coping group, the OR of childhood abuse was 6.012, while in the positive coping group, the OR of childhood abuse was only 2.604. Conclusion The positive coping style is a protective factor for obsessive-compulsive disorder, and negative coping style and childhood abuse are risk factors for obsessive-compulsive disorder.

参考文献/References:


[1]Ruscio A,MStein DJ,Chiu WT,et al.The epidemiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication[J].Molecular Psychiatry,2010,15(1):53-63.
[2]Vidal-Ribas P,Stringaris A,Ruck C,et al.Are stressful life events causally related to the severity of obsessive-compulsive symptoms?A monozygotic twin difference study[J].Eur Psychiatry,2015,30(2):309-316.
[3]Worsley JD,Mcintyre JC,Bentall RP,et al.Childhood maltreatment and problematic social media use: The role of attachment and depression[J].Psychiatry Res,2018,25(267):88-93.
[4]Neumann E.Recollections of Emotional Abuse and Neglect in Childhood as Risk Factors for Depressive Disorders and the Need for Psychotherapy in Adult Life[J].J Nerv Ment Dis,2017,205(11):873-878.
[5]王雪梅,王振,徐海婷,等.早年创伤经历与强迫症的相关性研究[J].中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2011,20(1):7-9.
[6]Brents LK,Tripathi SP,Young J,et al.The role of childhood maltreatment in the altered trait and global expression of personality in cocaine addiction[J].J Psychiatr Res,2015,64(2):23-31.
[7]张一,孟凡强.修改耶鲁-布朗强迫量表的临床信度和效度研究[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1996(5):205-207.
[8]Munjiza A,Kostic M,Pesic D,et al.Higher concentration of interleukin 6 -A possible link between major depressive disorder and childhood abuse[J].Psychiatry Res,2018,264(3):26-30.
[9]王敏,季益富.焦虑障碍患者依恋模式及相关因素分析[J].中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2015,24(5):438-442.
[10]龚靖波,刘剑波,张雅捷,等.伴儿童期受虐史大学生的神经系统软体征发生状况及其相关因素[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2016,30(6):459-463.
[11]戴晓阳,张进辅,程灶火.常用心理评估量表手册[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2010:82-84.
[12]曹文胜,于宏华,许成岗,等.强迫障碍及其与人格障碍共病患者的童年期被虐待经历[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2007(7):481-483,487.
[13]许婷婷,赵青,王渊,等.强迫症患者的人格特质在早年创伤与强迫症状间的中介作用[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2017,31(10):788-792.
[14]邹彩媚,何成添,林勇,等.强迫症患者压力应对方式对照分析[J].临床医学研究与实践,2018,3(16):14-15.
[15]赵伟,刘桂萍,张华,等.大学生强迫症与应对方式、家庭环境及父母教养方式关系的研究[J].中国全科医学,2012,15(11):1238-1241.
[16]储召学,董毅,朱道民,等.强迫症患者童年创伤与应对方式及自动思维的关系[J].临床心身疾病杂志,2013,19(3):105-106.
[17]方建忠,魏英,赵胜军,等.强迫症患者家庭情感表达方式及其心理机制相关研究[J].临床心身疾病杂志,2011,17(1):30-33.
[18]李斌,杨彦春.强迫症患者的防御机制与应对方式[J].中国临床康复,2005(16):26-27.

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-02-25