[1]吴 云.静脉采血与末梢采血方法在血常规检验中的应用效果比较[J].医学信息,2019,32(09):171-173.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.09.058]
　WU Yun.Comparison of Application Results of Venous Blood Collection and Peripheral Blood Collection in Blood Routine Examination[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(09):171-173.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.09.058]
点击复制

静脉采血与末梢采血方法在血常规检验中的应用效果比较()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
32卷
期数:
2019年09期
页码:
171-173
栏目:
诊疗技术
出版日期:
2019-05-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of Application Results of Venous Blood Collection and Peripheral Blood Collection in Blood Routine Examination
文章编号:
1006-1959（2019）09-0171-03
作者:
吴 云
（佳木斯市中医院检验科，黑龙江 佳木斯 154000）
Author(s):
WU Yun
(Department of Clinical Laboratory,Jiamusi Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital,Jiamusi 154006, Heilongjiang,China)
关键词:
静脉采血; 末梢采血; 血常规检验; 采血方式
Keywords:
Venous blood collection; Peripheral blood collection; Blood routine test; Blood collection method
分类号:
R446.11
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.09.058
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探究静脉采血与末梢采血方法在血常规检验中的应用效果。方法 选取2018年7月某单位同一天入职体检需要检测血常规的体检人员160例，采用随机抽签法分为对照组和观察组，每组80例。对照组采用静脉采血，观察组采用末梢采血。使用全自动血细胞分析仪进行检测，并对检测结果中反应红细胞形态及数量、白细胞形态及数量、血小板形态及数量进行统计分析。结果 观察组的RBC、HGB、HCT、MCHC、PLT较对照组高；而WBC、NE较对照组低，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。两组MCH、MCV等余检测指标比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论 静脉采血的血常规检测结果较末梢采血更趋于真实值。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the application effect of venous blood collection and peripheral blood collection methods in blood routine examination. Methods A total of 160 physical examination personnel who required blood tests on the same day for a physical examination were selected. They were randomly divided into the control group and the observation group, with 80 cases in each group. The control group was treated with venous blood collection, and the observation group was treated with peripheral blood collection. The automatic blood cell analyzer was used for the detection, and the morphology and quantity of red blood cells, white blood cell morphology and quantity, platelet morphology and quantity were statistically analyzed. Results The RBC, HGB, HCT, MCHC and PLT of the observation group were higher than those of the control group. The WBC and NE were lower than the control group,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in MCH and MCV between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion The routine blood test results of venous blood collection are more realistic than the distal blood collection.

参考文献/References:

[1]漆晓君.不同采血方法用于血常规效果分析[J].世界临床医学,2017,11(4):234.
[2]王娴默,肖林,李彦林.不同采血方法对血常规检验的结果影响分析[J].检验医学与临床,2017,14(A01):10-12.
[3]赵延庆.静脉采血与末梢采血急查血常规的区别[J].中西医结合心血管病杂志2018,6(20):51-52.
[4]陈智勇.静脉采血与末梢采血血常规检验中差异性的研究进展述评[J].检验与诊断,2018,12(5):34-35.
[5]谢雪芳.不同采血方式对血常规检验结果的影响[J].医疗装备,2017,30(18):54.
[6]韩静.不同采血方法在血常规检验中的比较[J].医学检验,2016,11(2):126-127.
[7]左玉贤.对比探究血常规检验中末梢血与静脉血的具体运用[J].临床检验杂志,2018,7(4):710-711.
[8]杜作江.末梢血和静脉血不同采血方法行血常规检验的应用价值分析[J].临床检验杂志,2018,7(3):472-473.

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-05-01