[1]刘小良,廖鑫鑫,黄 鹏,等.经皮肾镜碎石术术中肾盂内压对预测术后感染的影响[J].医学信息,2019,32(24):66-68.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.24.021]
　LIU Xiao-liang,LIAO Xin-xin,HUANG Peng,et al.Effect of Intrapelvic Pressure during Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy on Predicting Postoperative Infection[J].Medical Information,2019,32(24):66-68.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.24.021]
点击复制

经皮肾镜碎石术术中肾盂内压对预测术后感染的影响()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
32卷
期数:
2019年24期
页码:
66-68
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2019-12-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of Intrapelvic Pressure during Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy on Predicting Postoperative Infection
文章编号:
1006-1959（2019）24-0066-03
作者:
刘小良1; 廖鑫鑫1; 黄 鹏1; 陆文宝1; 2; 张 良1; 周海滨1; 蔡 军1; 曾 泉1
（1.九江学院附属医院泌尿外科，江西 九江 332000；2.南昌大学第二附属医院泌尿外科，江西 南昌 330006）
Author(s):
LIU Xiao-liang1; LIAO Xin-xin1; HUANG Peng1; LU Wen-bao1; 2; ZHANG Liang1; ZHOU Hai-bin1; CAI Jun1; ZENG Quan1
(1.Department of Urology,Affiliated Hospital of Jiujiang University,Jiujiang 332000,Jiangxi,China;2.Department of Urology,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University,Nanchang 330006,Jiangxi,China)
关键词:
肾盂内压力; 经皮肾镜碎石术; 术后感染
Keywords:
ntrapelvic pressure; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Postoperative infection
分类号:
R69
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.24.021
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨经皮肾镜碎石术（PCNL）术中肾盂内压对术后感染的影响。方法 回顾性分析2017年12月~2018年2月我院79例行PCNL患者的临床资料，根据PCNL术后感染情况分为术后感染组（14例）和术后正常组（65例），比较两组临床特点及术中肾盂内压力变化对术后感染的影响。结果 两组年龄、性别、高血压病史、糖尿病病史、体重指数、结石大小及术中失血量比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；两组手术时间、IPP比较，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。多因素Logistic分析结果显示，手术时间和IPP是PCNL术后感染的危险因素。ROC曲线分析结果显示，IPP最佳截断值为37.5 mmHg，敏感性为56.92%，特异性为96.89%，曲线下面积为0.865，95%CI：0.704~0.946；手术时间最佳截断值为59.92 min，敏感性为52.31%，特异性为92.86%，曲线下面积为0.821，95%CI：0.738~0.984。结论 术中肾盂内压及手术时间是PCNL术后感染的独立危险因素，因此需监控IPP，避免因IPP过高引起术后感染。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the effect of intrapelvic pressure on postoperative infection during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Methods The clinical data of 79 patients with PCNL in our hospital from December 2017 to February 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into postoperative infection group (14 cases) and normal postoperative group (65 cases) according to PCNL postoperative infection status. The clinical characteristics of the two groups and the effects of intra-pelvic pressure changes on postoperative infections were compared. Results There were no significant differences in age, gender, history of hypertension, history of diabetes, body mass index, stone size, and blood loss during the two groups (P>0.05). There was statistically significant difference in surgical time and IPP between the two groups (P<0.05). Multivariate Logistic analysis showed that operation time and IPP were risk factors for PCNL infection. The results of ROC curve analysis showed that the optimal cutoff value of IPP was 37.5 mmHg, the sensitivity was 56.92%, the specificity was 96.89%, the area under the curve was 0.865, and the 95% CI : 0.704~0.94; the optimal cutoff value for operation time was 59.92 min,the sensitivity is 52.31%, the specificity is 92.86%, the area under the curve is 0.821, and the 95% CI :0.738~0.984. Conclusion Intraoperative renal pelvis pressure and operation time are independent risk factors for postoperative infection of PCNL. Therefore, IPP should be monitored to avoid postoperative infection due to high IPP.

参考文献/References:

[1]Knoll T,Daels F,Desai J,et al.Percutaneous nephrolithotomy:technique[J].World Journal of Urology,2017,35(9):1-8.[2]Zeng G,Zhang T,Agrawal M,et al.Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 1-2 cm lower-pole renal calculi:an international multicenter randomized controlled trial.[J].European Urology Supplements,2018,16(7):e2578.[3]Guohua Z,Wen Z,Xun L,et al.The influence of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal pelvic pressure in vivo[J].Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy&Percutaneous Techniques,2007,17(4):307-310.[4]Wollin DA,Preminger GM.Percutaneous nephrolithotomy:complications and how to deal with them[J].Urolithiasis,2018,46(1):87-97.[5]Kyriazis I,Panagopoulos V,Kallidonis P,et al.Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy[J].World Journal of Urology,2015,33(8):1069-1077.[6]Singh P,Yadav S,Singh A,et al.Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Following Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy:Assessment of Risk Factors and Their Impact on Patient Outcomes[J].Urol Int,2016(96):207-211.[7]Wagenlehner FM,Tandogdu Z,Bjerklund Johansen TE.An update on classification and management of urosepsis[J].Curr Opin Urol,2017,27(2):133-137.[8]陈东.肾结石患者经皮肾镜取石术后感染危险因素分析[D].广东医科大学,2018.[9]陆奇,余月,习海波,等.经皮肾镜取石术后发生脓毒血症的危险因素评估及防治[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2017,38(3):238-240.[10]杜泉,刘燕妮,徐晓峰,等.经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石后复发的因素分析与干预[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2014,23(36):4021-4023.[11]杨嗣星,郑府,柯芹,等.软性输尿管镜碎石术中肾盂内压力监测方法及意义[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2014,35(8):575-578.[12]张华.输尿管软镜术中肾盂压力影响因素的临床研究[D].广州医科大学,2016.[13]谢国海,刘万樟,方立,等.经皮肾镜取石术术中肾盂内压与镜鞘比的关系[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2018,39(9):703-706.[14]Loftus CJ,Hinck B,Makovey I,et al.Mini versus Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy:the impact of sheath size on intra-renal pelvic pressure and infectious complications in a porcine model[J].Journal of Endourology,2018,32(4):350-353.[15]Suzuki T,Seki S,Hiramoto K,et al.Hyperactivation of Nrf2 in early tubular development induces nephrogenic diabetes insipidus[J].Nat Commun,2017(8):14577.

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-12-15