[1]周建国,陈 超,吴静燕,等.新生儿呼吸管理技术培训中采用渐进式教学学员认同度及满意度调查[J].医学信息,2020,33(09):125-127,130.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.09.039]
　ZHOU Jian-guo,CHEN Chao,WU Jing-yan,et al.The Recognition and Satisfaction Survey of Students on A Progressive Training Program for Improving Neonatal Respiratory Care Skills[J].Medical Information,2020,33(09):125-127,130.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.09.039]
点击复制

新生儿呼吸管理技术培训中采用渐进式教学学员认同度及满意度调查()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
33卷
期数:
2020年09期
页码:
125-127,130
栏目:
调查分析
出版日期:
2020-05-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Recognition and Satisfaction Survey of Students on A Progressive Training Program for Improving Neonatal Respiratory Care Skills
文章编号:
1006-1959（2020）09-0125-04
作者:
周建国; 陈 超; 吴静燕; 等
（复旦大学附属儿科医院新生儿科1，教育培训部2，上海 201102）
Author(s):
ZHOU Jian-guo; CHEN Chao; WU Jing-yan; et al
(Department of Neonatology1,Clinical Training and Education Center2,Children’s Hospital of Fudan University,Shanghai 201102,China)
关键词:
模拟培训; 渐进教学; 新生儿学; 呼吸管理
Keywords:
Simulation training; Progressive teaching; Neonatology; Respiratory management
分类号:
R474；G642
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.09.039
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨“理论-操作-模拟”渐进式教学在新生儿呼吸管理技术培训中的应用，评估学员对该教学模式认同度及满意度。方法 选取2017年12月~2018年12月来自全国各地的参与《新生儿呼吸管理技术培训项目》培训的130位学员进行培训后问卷调查，了解学员基本背景，评估学员对课程的认同度及满意度。结果 共发放问卷130份，收集有效问卷113份，有效回收率为86.92%。学员平均年龄（36.84±5.36）岁，主治及以上职称医生占比82.30%。课程满意度调查显示：“非常满意”最高的为病例模拟培训（92.92%）,最低的为呼吸管理新技术（68.14%）；总体满意度最高的为呼吸基础和呼吸疾病理论教学（100.00%）。呼吸系统相关检查及监测整体满意度较低为93.81%，呼吸管理新技术为92.92%，其余均大于95.00%。学员对于模拟培训提升临床实践、思维、呼吸机操作、合理诊疗能力、导师营造了知识学习、问题反馈和讨论的良好氛围等调查项目的整体认同度均超过95.00%。结论 “理论-操作-模拟”渐进式新生儿呼吸管理技术培训，学员满意度高；学员对模拟培训提升新生儿呼吸管理能力认同度高；该培训模式值得进一步探索、改进和推广。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the application of "theory-operation-simulation" progressive teaching in the training of neonatal respiratory management technology, and to assess the student’s recognition and satisfaction with the teaching model. Methods From December 2017 to December 2018, 130 trainees from all parts of the country who participated in the "Newborn Respiratory Management Technology Training Project" were selected to conduct a post-training questionnaire survey to understand the basic background of the trainees and evaluate the students’ recognition and satisfaction with the course degree.Results A total of 130 questionnaires were distributed, and 113 valid questionnaires were collected. The effective response rate was 86.92%. The average age of the trainees is (36.84±5.36) years old, and 82.30% of them are doctors with professional titles or above. Curriculum satisfaction survey showed that the highest level of "very satisfied" was case simulation training (92.92%), and the lowest level was new respiratory management technology (68.14%); the highest overall satisfaction level was the teaching of basic respiratory theory and respiratory disease (100.00%).The overall satisfaction with respiratory system related examinations and monitoring was 93.81%, the new respiratory management technology was 92.92%, and the rest were all greater than 95.00%.Participants’ overall recognition of investigation projects such as simulation training to improve clinical practice, thinking, ventilator operation, reasonable diagnosis and treatment capabilities, instructors created a good atmosphere for knowledge learning, problem feedback, and discussion exceeded 95.00%. Conclusion The "theory-operation-simulation" progressive neonatal respiratory management technical training has high student satisfaction; the participants have a high degree of recognition of the simulation training to enhance the neonatal respiratory management ability; this training model is worth further exploration, improvement and promotion.

参考文献/References:

[1]Owen LS,Manley BJ,Davis PG,et al.The evolution of modern respiratory care for preterm infants[J].Lancet,2017,389(10079):1649-1659.[2]Cepeda Brito JR,Hughes PG,Firestone KS,et al.Neonatal Resuscitation Program Rolling Refresher:Maintaining Chest Compression Proficiency Through the Use of Simulation-Based Education[J].Adv Neonatal Care,2017,17(5):354-361.[3]Escobedo MB,Shah BA,Song C,et al.Recent Recommendations and Emerging Science in Neonatal Resuscitation[J].Pediatr Clin North Am,2019,66(2):309-320.[4]Gaba DM.The future vision of simulation in health care[J].Qual Saf Health Care,2004,13(1):2-10.[5]Dankbaar ME,Alsma J,Jansen EE,et al.An experimental study on the effects of a simulation game on students’ clinical cognitive skills and motivation[J].Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract,2016,21(3):505-521.[6]Tolks D,Schafer C,Raupach T,et al.An Introduction to the Inverted/Flipped Classroom Model in Education and Advanced Training in Medicine and in the Healthcare Professions[J].GMS J Med Educ,2016,33(3):Doc46.[7]Anderson JM,Murphy AA,Boyle KB,et al.Simulating extracorporeal membrane oxygenation emergencies to improve human performance.Part II:assessment of technical and behavioral skills[J].Simul Healthc,2006,1(4):228-232.[8]Reed T,Pirotte M,McHugh M,et al.Simulation-Based Mastery Learning Improves Medical Student Performance and Retention of Core Clinical Skills[J].Simul Healthc,2016,11(3):173-180.[9]Sawyer T,White M,Zaveri P,et al.Learn,see,practice,prove,do,maintain:an evidence-based pedagogical framework for procedural skill training in medicine[J].Acad Med,2015,90(8):1025-1033.[10]Geurtzen R,Hogeveen M,Rajani AK,et al.Using simulation to study difficult clinical issues:prenatal counseling at the threshold of viability across American and Dutch cultures[J].Simul Healthc,2014,9(3):167-173.[11]Weems MF,Friedlich PS,Nelson LP,et al.The Role of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Simulation Training at Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Centers in the United States[J].Simul Healthc,2017,12(4):233-239.[12]Campbell DM,Dadiz R.Simulation in neonatal transport medicine[J].Semin Perinatol,2016,40(7):430-437.

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-05-01