[1]谢超帆,刘俊波,张 强,等.米拉贝隆治疗膀胱过度活动症的有效性和安全性的Meta分析[J].医学信息,2020,33(10):85-89.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.10.023]
 XIE Chao-fan,LIU Jun-bo,ZHANG Qiang,et al.Meta Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Mirabegron in the Treatment of Overactive Bladder[J].Medical Information,2020,33(10):85-89.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.10.023]
点击复制

米拉贝隆治疗膀胱过度活动症的有效性和安全性的Meta分析()
分享到:

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
33卷
期数:
2020年10期
页码:
85-89
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2020-05-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Meta Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Mirabegron in the Treatment of Overactive Bladder
文章编号:
1006-1959(2020)10-0085-05
作者:
谢超帆刘俊波张 强
(川北医学院附属医院泌尿外科,四川 南充 637000)
Author(s):
XIE Chao-fanLIU Jun-boZHANG Qianget al
(Department of Urology,the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College,Nanchong 637000,Sichuan,China)
关键词:
米拉贝隆膀胱过度活动症心血管风险Meta分析
Keywords:
MirabegronOveractive bladderCardiovascular riskMeta analysis
分类号:
R694
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.10.023
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 比较米拉贝隆治疗膀胱过度活动症(OAB)的有效性和安全性,尤其是其对心血管系统的影响。方法 计算机检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Liberary、中国期刊全文数据库(CNKI)、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、万方数据库、维普数据库(VIP),纳入米拉贝隆治疗膀胱过度活动症的随机对照试验,根据纳入和排除标准选择文献并进行偏倚风险评价和数据提取,采用Revman5.3软件进行Meta 分析。结果 共检出335篇文献,最终纳入9个RCT,共14302例OAB患者。Meta分析结果显示,米拉贝隆治疗OAB 的24h平均排尿次数、24h平均尿失禁次数、每晚平均夜尿次数、24h的平均尿急次数与索利那新比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。但索利那新每次排尿的平均排出量优于米拉贝隆(P=0.02),米拉贝隆发生高血压、QT间期延长、心律失常、心动过速与安慰剂比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);米拉贝隆口干发生率低于索利那新,差异有统计学意义(P=0.0002)。结论 米拉贝隆治疗OAB与索利那新疗效相当,但口干等不良反应发生率更低,并且不会增加心血管系统相关风险。因此,米拉贝隆具有良好的耐受性,是一种有效和安全的药物治疗方法。
Abstract:
Objective This article aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of mirabegron in the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB), especially its impact on the cardiovascular system.Methods Computer search PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Liberary, Chinese Journal Full-text Database (CNKI), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Wanfang Database, Vip Database (VIP), and included a randomized control of mirabegron for the treatment of overactive bladder in the experiment, literatures were selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and bias risk evaluation and data extraction were performed. Meta analysis was performed using Revman5.3 software.Results A total of 335 articles were detected, and finally 9 RCTs were included, with a total of 14,302 patients with OAB.Meta analysis showed that the mean number of micturition per 24,the mean number of incontinence episodes per 24h、the mean number of nocturia per night、and the urgency episodes per 24h were not statistically significant (P>0.05). However, the volume voided per micturitionsolinacin was superior to mirabegron (P=0.02).Compared with placebo, the incidence of hypertension, QT prolongation, arrhythmia, tachycardia and placebo in mirabegron were not statistically significant (P> 0.05); the incidence of dry mouth of mirabegron was lower than solinaxin,the difference was statistically significant(P=0.0002).Conclusion Mirabegron is equivalent to solinaxin in the treatment of OAB, but the incidence of adverse reactions such as dry mouth is lower, and it does not increase the cardiovascular system-related risks. Therefore, mirabegron is well tolerated and is an effective and safe drug treatment method.

参考文献/References:

[1]Chuang YC,Liu SP,Lee KS,et al.Prevalence of overactive bladder in China, Taiwan and South Korea:results from across-sectional,population-based study[J].Low Urin Tract Symptoms,2019,11(1):48-55. [2]Milsom I,Coyne KS,Nicholson S,et al.Global prevalence and economic burden of urgency urinary incontinence:a systematic review[J].Eur Urol,2014,65(1):79-95.[3]Symonds T.A review of condition-specific in struments to assess the impact of urinary incontinence on health-related quality of life[J].Eur Urol,2003,43(3):219-225.[4]Sanford M.Mirabegron:a review of its use in patients with overactive bladder syndrome[J].Drugs,2013,73(11):1213-1225.[5]Andersson KE.Prospective pharmacologic therapies for the overactive bladder[J].Ther Adv Urol,2009,1(2):71-83.[6]Moher D,Shamseer L,Clarke M,et al.Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols(PRISMA-P)2015 statement[J].Syst Rev,2015,4(1):1. [7]Abrams P,Kelleher C,Staskin D,et al.Combination treatment with mirabegron and solifenacin in patients with overactive bladder:efficacy and safety results from a randomised,double blind,dose-ranging,phase 2 study(Symphony)[J].Eur Urol,2015,67(3):577-588.[8]Batista JE,Kolbl H,Herschorn S,et al.The efficacy and safety of mirabegron compared with solifenacin in overactive bladder patients dissatisfied with previous antimuscarinic treatment due to lack of efficacy:results of a noninferiority,randomized, phase Ⅲb trial[J].Ther Adv Urol,2015,7(4):167-179.[9]Herschorn S,Chapple CR,Abrams P,et al.Efficacy and safety of combinations of mirabegron and solifenacin compared with monotherapy and placebo in patients with overactive bladder(SYNERGY study)[J].BJU Int,2017,120(4):562-575.[10]Gratzke C,van Maanen R,Chapple C,et al.Long-term safety and efficacy of mirabegron and solifenacin in combination compared with monotherapy in patients with overactive bladder:a randomised, multicentre phase 3 study(SYNERGY Ⅱ)[J].Eur Urol,2018,74(4):501-509.[11]Nitti VW,Auerbach S,Martin N,et al.Results of a randomized phase Ⅲ trial of mirabegron in patients with overactive bladder[J].J Urol,2013,189(4):1388-1395.[12]Khullar V,Amarenco G,Angulo JC,et al.Efficacy and tolerability of mirabegron,a beta(3)-adrenoceptor agonist,in patients with overactive bladder:results from a randomised European-Australian phase 3 trial[J].Eur Urol,2013,63(2):283-295.[13]Herschorn S,Barkin J,Castro-Diaz D,et al.A phase Ⅲ,randomized,double-blind,parallelgroup, placebo-controlled,multicentre study to assess the efficacy and safety of the β3 adrenoceptor agonist,mirabegron, in patients with symptoms of overactive bladder[J].Urology,2013,82(2):313-320.[14]Yamaguchi O,Marui E,Kakizaki H,et al.Phase Ⅲ,randomised,doubleblind,placebo-controlled study of the beta3-adrenoceptor agonist mirabegron,50 mg once daily, in Japanese patients with overactive bladder[J].BJU Int,2014,113(6):951-960.[15]Kuo HC,Lee KS,Na Y,et al.Results of a randomized,double-blind, parallel-group,placebo-and active-controlled,multicenter study of mirabegron,a beta3-adrenoceptor agonist,in patients with overactive bladder in Asia[J].Neurourol Urodyn,2015,34(7):685-692.[16]Rosa GM,Ferrero S,Nitti VW,et al.Cardiovascular Safety of 3-adrenoceptor Agonists for theTreatment of Patients with Overactive Bladder Syndrome[J].European Urology,2016,69(2):311-323.[17]王梓阳,姜成龙,廖鹏腾,等.米拉贝隆与托特罗定治疗膀胱过度活动症的Meta分析[J].现代泌尿外科杂志,2019,24(2):122-127[18]Sebastianelli A,Russo GI,Kaplan SA,et al.Systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and tolerability of mirabegron for the treatment of storage lower urinary tract symptoms/overactive bladder:Comparison with placebo and tolterodine[J].Int J Urol,2018,25(3):196-205.[19]Xu Y,Liu R,Liu C,et al.Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Mirabegron Add-On Therapy to Solifenacin for Overactive Bladder[J].International Neurourology Journal,2017,21(3):212-219.

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-05-15