[1]徐灿华,陈荣春,吴增晖,等.两种不同术式治疗腰椎融合术后邻近节段退变的疗效[J].医学信息,2020,33(20):86-88.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.20.024]
　XU Can-hua,CHEN Rong-chun,WU Zeng-hui,et al.The Curative Effect of Two Different Surgical Procedures on Adjacent Segment Degeneration After Lumbar Fusion[J].Medical Information,2020,33(20):86-88.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.20.024]
点击复制

两种不同术式治疗腰椎融合术后邻近节段退变的疗效()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
33卷
期数:
2020年20期
页码:
86-88
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-10-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Curative Effect of Two Different Surgical Procedures on Adjacent Segment Degeneration After Lumbar Fusion
文章编号:
1006-1959（2020）20-0086-03
作者:
徐灿华; 陈荣春; 吴增晖; 等
（1.赣州市人民医院脊柱外科，江西 赣州 341000； 2.广州军区广州总医院脊柱二科，广东 广州 510010）
Author(s):
XU Can-hua; CHEN Rong-chun; WU Zeng-hui; et al
(1.Department of Spine Surgery,Ganzhou People’s Hospital,Ganzhou 341000,Jiangxi,China; 2.Department of Spine,Subject Two,Guangzhou General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Region,Guangzhou 510010,Guangdong,China)
关键词:
腰椎; 邻近节段退变; 极外侧腰椎椎间融合术
Keywords:
Lumbar spine; Adjacent segment degeneration; Extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion
分类号:
R687
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.20.024
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 比较极外侧入路腰椎椎间融合术（XLIF）与传统后路手术治疗腰椎融合术后邻近节段退变的临床效果。方法 选择2014年1月~2017年10月我院收治的腰椎融合术后邻近节段病变患者40例，随机分为A、B两组，各20例。A组采用极外侧入路腰椎椎间植骨椎体钉固定治疗，B组采用传统后侧入路椎间植骨椎弓根钉固定治疗；记录两组手术切口长度、手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流液量、住院时间，比较两组手术前、后Oswestry功能障碍指数（ODI）、疼痛评分（VAS）、椎间融合率及术后并发症。结果 A组手术切口长度、手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、住院时间均少于B组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；两组术后1、6、12个月 ODI指数、VAS均优于术前，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；两组术后1个月ODI指数、VAS评分比较，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；两组术后6、12个月ODI指数、VAS评分间比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；术后12个月两组椎间融合率均为95.00%；A组术后股神经损伤2例，术后9周内恢复；B组脑脊液漏3例，切口浅表感染1例予抗感染治愈。结论 与传统后路手术相比，极外侧入路治疗腰椎融合术后邻近节段病变效果较好，具有手术损伤小、时间短、并发症少、脊柱稳定性好、术后恢复快及效果理想等优点。
Abstract:
Objective To compare the clinical effects of extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion (XLIF) and traditional posterior approach in the treatment of adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar fusion.Methods From January 2014 to October 2017, 40 patients with adjacent segment lesions after lumbar fusion were selected and randomly divided into two groups A and B, with 20 cases in each group. Group A was treated with extreme lateral approach lumbar intervertebral bone graft and pedicle screw fixation, group B was treated with traditional posterior approach intervertebral bone graft and pedicle screw fixation; the length of the surgical incision, operation time, and intraoperative bleeding were recorded the Oswestry dysfunction index (ODI), pain score (VAS), intervertebral fusion rate and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups before and after surgery.Results The length of surgical incision, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, and hospital stay in group A were less than those in group B, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); the two groups had ODI at 1, 6, and 12 months after operation the index and VAS were better than those before operation,the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05); the comparison of ODI index and VAS score between the two groups at 1 month after operation was statistically significant (P＜0.05); There was no significant difference in ODI index and VAS score between the two groups at 6 and 12 months after operation (P>0.05); the intervertebral fusion rate of both groups was 95.00% at 12 months after operation; group A after the femoral nerve 2 cases of injury recovered within 9 weeks after operation; 3 cases of cerebrospinal fluid leakage in group B and 1 case of superficial infection of the incision were cured with anti-infection.Conclusion Compared with the traditional posterior approach, the extreme lateral approach had a better effect on the treatment of adjacent segment lesions after lumbar fusion, with less surgical damage, short time, fewer complications, good spinal stability, quick postoperative recovery and ideal results advantage.

参考文献/References:

[1]Lee CS,Hwang CJ,Lee SW,et al.Risk factors for adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion[J].European Spine Journal,2009,18(11):1637. [2]Smith WD,Youssef JA,Christian G,et al.Lumbarized sacrum as a relative contraindication for lateral transpsoas interbody fusion at L5-6[J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2012,25(5):285-291. [3]Zhong ZM,Deviren V,Tay B,et al.Adjacent segment disease after instrumented fusion for adult lumbar spondylolisthesis:incidence and risk factors[J].Clin Neurol Neurosurg,2017(156):29-34. [4]Tian H,Wu A,Guo M,et al.Adequate restoration of disc height and segmental lordosis by lumbar interbody fusion decreases adjacent segment degeneration[J].World Neurosurg,2018(118):e856-e864. [5]Bydon M,Macki M,De La Garzaramos R,et al.Incidence of adjacent segment disease requiring reoperation after lumbar laminectomy without fusion:a study of 398 patients[J].Neurosurgery,2016,78(2):192-199. [6]Imagama S,Kawakami N,Matsubara Y,et al.Radiographic adjacent segment degeneration at 5 years after l4/5 posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation evaluation by computed tomography and annual screening with magnetic resonance imaging[J].Clin Spine Surg,2016,29(9):E442-E451. [7]Smorgick Y,Baker KC,Baehison CC.et al.Hidden blood loss during posterior spine fusion surgery[J].Spine J,2013,13(8):877-881． [8]Wong AP,Smith ZA,Nixon AT,et al.Intraoperative and perioperative complications in minimally invasive transforami-nat lumbar interbedy fusion：a review of 513 patients[J].J Neurosurg Spine,2015,22(5):487-495. [9]Lang G,Perrech M,Navarro-Ramirez R,et al.Potential and limitations oI neural decompression in extreme lateral interbody fusion-a systematic review[J].World Neurosurg,2017(101):99-113． [10]Khajavi K,Shen A,Hutchison A.Substantial clinical benefit of minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion for degeneratire spondylolisthesis[J].Eur Spine J,2015,24(3):314-321． [11]Berjano P,Langella F,Damilano M,et al.Fusion rate following extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion[J].Eur Spine J,2015,24(Suppl3):369-371. [12]蓝思彬,吴增晖,许俊杰,等.极外侧入路腰椎间融合术联合双侧椎弓根螺钉固定治疗腰椎滑脱症[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2018,28(5):405-409.

相似文献/References:

[1]邓忠齐,罗小辑.两种成像方式测量腰椎矢状位参数的比较[J].医学信息,2021,34(01):64.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.01.018]
　DENG Zhong-qi,LUO Xiao-ji.Comparison of the Measurement of the Sagittal Parameters of the Lumbar Spine with Two Imaging Methods[J].Medical Information,2021,34(20):64.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.01.018]
[2]杨立进.颈椎ACDF融合术后邻椎病的研究现状[J].医学信息,2021,34(20):61.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.20.015]
　YANG Li-Jin.Research Status of Adjacent Vertebral Diseases After Cervical ACDF Fusion[J].Medical Information,2021,34(20):61.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.20.015]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01