[1]周任材.基于嵌入式学科服务聚焦成果产出研究[J].医学信息,2021,34(11):12-15.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.11.004]
 ZHOU Ren-cai.Based on the Embedded Subject Service Focusing on the Output Research[J].Medical Information,2021,34(11):12-15.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.11.004]
点击复制

基于嵌入式学科服务聚焦成果产出研究()
分享到:

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
34卷
期数:
2021年11期
页码:
12-15
栏目:
出版日期:
2021-06-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Based on the Embedded Subject Service Focusing on the Output Research
文章编号:
1006-1959(2021)11-0012-04
作者:
周任材
(福建中医药大学图书馆,福建 福州 350122)
Author(s):
ZHOU Ren-cai
(Library of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Fuzhou 350122,Fujian,China)
关键词:
学科评价学科分析学科服务康复医学
Keywords:
Subject evaluationSubject analysisSubject serviceRehabilitation medicine
分类号:
G258.6
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.11.004
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
“双一流”战略赋予了高等院校学科建设新的机遇和挑战,同时也为图书馆的服务转型提供了新理念和新动力,嵌入式学科服务是高校图书馆在新时代背景与信息环境下实现转型发展的必然举措。本文基于Web of Science数据库与相关分析工具,以A大学康复医学学科为例,嵌入开展科研产出及其学术影响力分析,探讨A大学康复医学学科的发展现状,发现学科建设的优势与不足,并提出对策,旨在助力学科发展。
Abstract:
The "Double First Class" strategy has given new opportunities and challenges to the discipline construction of institutions of higher learning, and it also provides new ideas and new impetus for the service transformation of libraries.Embedded subject services are an inevitable measure for college libraries to achieve transformation and development under the background and information environment of the new era.This article is based on the Web of Science database and related analysis tools, taking the rehabilitation medicine discipline of University A as an example, and embedding the analysis of scientific research output and its academic influence.Discussing the development status of the rehabilitation medicine discipline in University A, discover the advantages and disadvantages of discipline construction, and propose countermeasures to help the development of the discipline.

参考文献/References:

[1]王琳.基于WOS及ESI的高校图书馆学科服务创新模式研究[J].农业图书情报学刊,2018,30(5):160-164. [2]蒋德凤,庞蓓,曹红兵,等.基于WOS、ESI、Incites的单学科分析路径研究——以广西大学ESI化学学科分析为例[J].企业科技与发展,2017(10):46-49. [3]吴俊.图书馆、情报与文献学期刊的h指数分析——基于CSSCI(2008-2014年度)数据[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社科版),2015,36(12):237-240. [4]高耀,刘志明.从CSSCI看《教育科学》近年来的学术影响力——基于2002-2008年度的文献计量分析[J].教育科学,2010(3):1-4,6. [5]Ioannidis JPA,Klavans R,Boyack KW.Thousands of scientists publish a paper every five days[J].Nature,2018,561(7722):167-169. [6]Würtz M,Schmidt M.The stratified H-index makes scientific impact transparent[J].Ugeskr Laeger,2017,179(14):V12160886. [7]Tahira M,Alias RA,Bakri A.Application of h and h-type indices at meso level: A case of Malaysian engineering research[J].Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science,2015,20(3):77-86. [8]Csajbók E,Berhidi A,Vasas L,et al.Hirsch-index for countries based on EssentialScience Indicators data[J].Scientometrics,2017,73(1):91-117. [9]Egghe L,Rousseau R.An Informetric Model for The Hirsh-index[J].Scientometrics,2006,69(1):121-129. [10]Bornmann L,Daniel H.What do we Know About The h Index[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2007,58(9):1381-1385. [11]王彩虹,薛龙彦.高校图书馆发表期刊论文的h指数关联因素比较研究[J].情报探索,2015(1):42-48. [12]孙慧云.改革开放以来我国情报学发展脉络——基于情报学论文的分析研究[J].图书情报导刊,2017,2(9):47-55. [13]张良辉,刘虹,章文苑.基于CSCD的四川农业大学学科分析[J].图书情报导刊,2014,24(3):136-139. [14]张娟.中国农业科学院科技期刊学术影响力及发展趋势分析[J].农业图书情报学刊,2018,30(11):133-136. [15]谈小龙,苗天宝,高敏,等.科研合作对论文产出质量影响的研究——一种基于Scopus引文库的分析方法[J].科教导刊,2019(25):65-67. [16]朱敏.安徽省本科高校图书馆嵌入式学科服务现状调查分析[J].内蒙古科技与经济,2020(9):124-126. [17]Bindu N,Sankar CP,Kumar KS.Research collaboration and knowledge sharing in e-governance[J].Transforming Government People Process&Policy,2019,13(1):2-33. [18]许鑫,杨佳颖,李丹.科学基金资助下的国际科研合作网络演进:基于WOS物理学数据的计量分析[J].情报杂志,2019,38(2):49-55,48. [19]邵媛,余晶.基于InCites数据库的高校ESI学科评价及影响力分析——以新疆大学学科影响力评价为例[J].高教学刊,2018(6):194-196. [20]邱均平,曾倩.国际合作是否能提高科研影响力——以计算机科学为例[J].情报理论与实践,2013,36(10):1-5.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01