[1]郑国学,康藤耀,谭 强,等.切开取栓与杂交手术治疗急性下肢缺血的疗效比较[J].医学信息,2021,34(11):114-117.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.11.031]
　ZHENG Guo-xue,KANG Teng-yao,TAN Qiang,et al.Comparison of Curative Effect Between Incision and Embolectomy and Hybrid Surgery in the Treatment of Acute Lower Limb Ischemia[J].Medical Information,2021,34(11):114-117.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.11.031]
点击复制

切开取栓与杂交手术治疗急性下肢缺血的疗效比较()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
34卷
期数:
2021年11期
页码:
114-117
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2021-06-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of Curative Effect Between Incision and Embolectomy and Hybrid Surgery in the Treatment of Acute Lower Limb Ischemia
文章编号:
1006-1959（2021）11-0114-04
作者:
郑国学; 康藤耀; 谭 强; 等
（川北医学院附属医院血管外科，四川 南充 637000）
Author(s):
ZHENG Guo-xue; KANG Teng-yao; TAN Qiang; et al.
(Department of Vascular Surgery,Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College,Nanchong 637000,Sichuan,China)
关键词:
急性下肢缺血; 切开取栓术; 杂交手术
Keywords:
Acute lower limb ischemia; Incision and embolectomy; Hybrid surgery
分类号:
R543
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.11.031
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 比较切开取栓与杂交手术治疗急性下肢缺血（ALLI）的安全性和有效性。方法 回顾性分析2016年1月1日~2020年6月30日在我科治疗的51例急性下肢缺血患者的临床及术后1月随访资料，根据手术方式分为切开取栓组（28例）和杂交手术组（23例），比较两组手术后30 d内疗效、并发症发生率、手术再干预率、死亡率、住院时长及日均住院费用。结果 切开取栓组手术后30 d内总有效率高于杂交手术组（89.29% vs 78.26%)，但差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；两组并发症发生率、死亡率、手术再干预率比较，差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；杂交手术组住院时长及日均住院费用高于切开取栓组高，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 切开取栓术与杂交手术治疗ALLI均安全有效，疗效无明显差异，但杂交手术费用更高且住院时间更长，应优先推荐切开取栓术。
Abstract:
Objective To compare the safety and effectiveness of incision and embolectomy and hybrid surgery in the treatment of acute lower limb ischemia(ALLI).Methods To retrospectively analyze the clinical and 1-month follow-up data of 51 patients with acute lower limb ischemia treated in our department from January 1, 2016 to June 30, 2020.According to the method of operation, it was divided into a thrombus removal group (28 cases) and a hybrid operation group (23 cases).The efficacy, complication rate, re-intervention rate, mortality rate, length of hospital stay and average daily hospitalization expenses within 30 d after surgery were compared between the two groups.Results The total effective rate within 30 d after surgery in the thrombus removal group was higher than that in the hybrid surgery group (89.29% vs 78.26%), but the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05);There was no statistically significant difference in the complication rate, mortality rate, and re-intervention rate between the two groups (P>0.05);The length of hospital stay and average daily hospitalization expenses in the hybrid surgery group were higher than those in the incision and thrombus removal group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Both open embolectomy and hybrid surgery are safe and effective in treating ALLI, and there is no significant difference in efficacy. However, the cost of hybrid surgery is higher and the hospital stay is longer, so embolectomy should be recommended first.

参考文献/References:

[1]de Donato G,Pasqui E,Setacci F,et al.Acute on chronic limb ischemia:From surgical embolectomy and thrombolysis to endovascular options[J].Semin Vasc Surg,2018,31(2-4):66-75. [2]Cho SB,Choi HC,Lee SM,et al.Combined treatment(image-guided thrombectomy and endovascular therapy with open femoral access)for acute lower limb ischemia:Clinical efficacy and outcomes[J].PLoS One,2019,14(11):e0225136. [3]公茂峰,顾建平,陈罔平,等.AngioJet血栓清除术在急性下肢动脉缺血治疗中的应用[J].介入放射学杂志,2017(26):509-513. [4]孙浩,李凤贺,张茅,等.导管接触性溶栓联合腔内血管成形术治疗急性下肢缺血疗效分析[J].中华医学杂志,2019,9(17):2785-2788. [5]Grip O,Wanhainen A,Michaelsson K,et al.Open or endovascular revascularization in the treatment of acute lower limb ischaemia[J].Br J Surg,2018,105(12):1598-1606. [6]陈浩,曾昭凡,戚悠飞,等.急性下肢缺血94例诊治分析[J].中国血管外科杂志(电子版),2019,11(4):289-292,305. [7]Veenstra EB,van der Laan MJ,Zeebregts CJ,et al.A systematic review and meta-analysis of endovascular and surgical revascularization techniques in acute limb ischemia[J].J Vasc Surg,2020,71(2):654-668.e3. [8]Ebben HP,van Burink MV,Jongkind V,et al.Efficacy versus Complications in Arterial Thrombolysis[J].Ann Vasc Surg,2018(48):111-118. [9]Darwood R,Berridge DC,Kessel DO,et al.Surgery versus thrombolysis for initial management of acute limb ischaemia[J].Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2018,8(8):CD002784. [10]张骞,江海洋,付健,等.导管接触溶栓与切开取栓治疗急性下肢缺血效果比较[J].介入放射学杂志,2019,28(3):223-227 [11]Liang S,Zhou L,Ye K,et al.Limb Salvage After Percutaneous Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients with Acute Lower Limb Ischemia:A Retrospective Analysis from Two Institutions[J].Annals of Vascular Surgery,2019(58):151-159. [12]Kwok CHR,Fleming S,Chan KKC,et al.Aspiration Thrombectomy versus Conventional Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis as First-Line Treatment for Noniatrogenic Acute Lower Limb Ischemia[J].Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology,2018,29(5):607-613. [13]徐荣伟,唐琳娜,张涛,等.杂交手术治疗急性下肢缺血[J].中华普通外科杂志,2019,6(34):546-547. [14]陈光,赵文军,陈亚红,等.切开取栓术和杂交手术治疗急性下肢缺血26例效果观察[J].浙江医学,2019,41(12):1316-1317.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01