[1]顾梦佳,蔡 斌,余 靓.运用DRGs指标综合评估医院质量及临床绩效的研究[J].医学信息,2021,34(14):22-24.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.14.006]
　GU Meng-jia,CAI Bin,YU Liang.Research on Comprehensive Evaluation of Hospital Quality and Clinical Performance Using DRGs Index[J].Medical Information,2021,34(14):22-24.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.14.006]
点击复制

运用DRGs指标综合评估医院质量及临床绩效的研究()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
34卷
期数:
2021年14期
页码:
22-24
栏目:
出版日期:
2021-07-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on Comprehensive Evaluation of Hospital Quality and Clinical Performance Using DRGs Index
文章编号:
1006-1959（2021）14-0022-03
作者:
顾梦佳; 蔡 斌; 余 靓
（浙江大学医学院附属邵逸夫医院质量管理办公室，浙江 杭州 310016）
Author(s):
GU Meng-jia; CAI Bin; YU Liang
(Quality Management Office,Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital,School of Medicine,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310016,Zhejiang,China)
关键词:
疾病诊断相关分组; DRGs分组器; 医院质量管理; 科室绩效评价; 病例组合指数; 相对权重
Keywords:
Diagnosis related groups; DRGs grouping device; Hospital quality management; Department performance evaluation; Case mix index; Relative weights
分类号:
R197
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.14.006
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨疾病诊断相关分组（DRGs）评价工具在医院质量管理与临床科室绩效评价中的应用。方法 利用浙江省DRGs分组器分析2018年与2019年医院整体与临床科室DRGs指标，包括病例组合指数、相对权重以及三四级手术比例情况。结果 2019年的各项医疗质量与绩效评价数据相比2018年均有所提高，其中CMI值增幅为1.24%，平均住院日及费用指标均有下降，同时三四级手术比例上升。临床科室方面，总体CMI值、RW≥2占比呈上升趋势，而平均住院日及三四级手术略有下降，其中外科A的CMI值为3.36，三四级手术比例为93.93%，为外科最高科室；内科F的CMI值为2.43，RW≥2占比为41.18%，为内科最高科室。结论 医院综合服务能力与质量安全不断提升，同时能兼顾效率与费用，但应注重调整收治病种结构，注重学科均衡发展，提升综合能力。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the application of evaluation tools related to disease diagnosis groups (DRGs) in hospital quality management and clinical department performance evaluation.Methods Using Zhejiang DRGs grouper to analyze the DRGs indicators of the hospital as a whole and clinical departments in 2018 and 2019,Including the case mix index, relative weights, and the proportions of third or fourth grades of surgery.Results The various medical quality and performance evaluation data in 2019 had improved compared with 2018, and the CMI value increased by 1.24%.The average length of stay and cost indicators had decreased, while the proportion of third or fourth grades operations has increased.In terms of clinical departments, the overall CMI value and the proportion of RW ≥ 2 were on the rise, while the average hospital stay and third or fourth grades operations had declined slightly.Among them, the CMI value of surgery A was 3.36, and the proportion of third and fourth grades operations was 93.93%, which was the highest department of surgery;The CMI value of internal medicine F was 2.43, and the proportion of RW≥2 was 41.18%, which was the highest department of internal medicine.Conclusion The hospital’s comprehensive service capabilities and quality and safety have been continuously improved, while taking into account both efficiency and cost.However, attention should be paid to adjusting the structure of disease types, focusing on the balanced development of disciplines, and enhancing comprehensive capabilities.

参考文献/References:

[1]陈帅.DRGs方法在临床医疗服务绩效评价中的应用[J].中国卫生产业,2017,14(33):153-155. [2]唐剑,陈武朝,王桂榕.疾病诊断相关分组(DRGs)研究及应用[J].中国病案,2014,15(5):36-39. [3]王志刚,潘莉,蔡静.RBRVS和DRGs与医院常用绩效评价方法的比较研究[J].中国医疗管理科学,2016(1):14-22. [4]李秀梅,胡海源,刘理,等.基于DRG三级综合医院住院绩效评价研究[J].卫生软科学,2020,34(11):11-14. [5]徐民,陈国强,廉颖,等.基于DRG的三级综合医院医疗服务绩效评价研究[J].中国病案,2020,21(6):46-49. [6]王芳,雷晓盛,赵显辉.基于DRGs的医院住院医疗服务绩效评价与应用[J].中国卫生信息管理,2020,17(3):383-389. [7]卢武红，孙菲，韩俊洋，等.DRGs绩效评价指标在三级综合医院科室医疗服务中的应用[J].中国病案,2020,21(10):6-9. [8]陈建平.上海申康十年公立医院改革探索[J].中国医院管理,2015,31(8):562-565. [9]吴丽萍.对比传统指标评价与DRGS指标综合管理评价在提升儿科医疗服务能力中的应用分析[J].当代医学,2020,26(16):112-113. [10]李贤华,郑战战,沈洋,等.疾病诊断相关分组在医院绩效考核中的评价[J].解放军医院管理杂志,2017,24(6):505-508. [11]周泽甫,龚敏勇.采用DRGs进行临床医疗服务绩效评价对医学专业技术发展的影响[J].中国卫生信息管理,2017,14(3):510-513.

相似文献/References:

[1]高 峰,刘 颜.DRG实施的难点及解决对策[J].医学信息,2022,35(11):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.11.001]
　GAO Feng,LIU Yan.Difficulties and Solutions of DRG Implementation[J].Medical Information,2022,35(14):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.11.001]
[2]陶 洋,王芳芳,朱晨晨,等.DRG付费法下晶体手术组盈亏的影响因素分析[J].医学信息,2022,35(11):5.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.11.002]
　TAO Yang,WANG Fang-fang,ZHU Chen-chen,et al.Analysis of Influencing Factors of Surplus for Crystal Surgery Group Under DRG Payment Method[J].Medical Information,2022,35(14):5.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.11.002]
[3]万映利,宋 萍.基于CiteSpace的国内外DRG热点分析及其发展建议[J].医学信息,2020,33(05):9.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.05.003]
　WAN Ying-li,SONG Ping.Hot Spot Analysis of DRG at Home and Abroad Based on CiteSpace and Its Development Suggestions[J].Medical Information,2020,33(14):9.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.05.003]
[4]李 杰,单思哲,杨 波,等.基于“军字一号”工程的DRG医院支付管理系统的设计与应用[J].医学信息,2022,35(03):17.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.03.004]
　LI Jie,Shan Si-zhe,YANG Bo,et al.Design and Application of DRG Hospital Payment Management SystemBased on "No.1 Military Project"[J].Medical Information,2022,35(14):17.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.03.004]
[5]陶 洋,王芳芳,朱晨晨,等.基于TOPSIS法与RSR法对外科绩效评价的对比分析[J].医学信息,2023,36(14):48.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.14.009]
　TAO Yang,WANG Fang-fang,ZHU Chen-chen,et al.Comparative Analysis of Surgical Performance Evaluation Based on TOPSIS and RSR[J].Medical Information,2023,36(14):48.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.14.009]
[6]詹汉强,魏鑫然.基于DRG/DIP支付背景下病种分值付费的研究[J].医学信息,2023,36(15):100.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.15.019]
　ZHAN Han-qiang,WEI Xin-ran.Research on Disease Score Payment Based on DRG/DIP Payment Mode[J].Medical Information,2023,36(14):100.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.15.019]
[7]汤 鑫,刘 颜.国内外DRG实践发展及其对我国的启示[J].医学信息,2023,36(21):27.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.21.006]
　TANG Xin,LIU Yan.Development of DRG Practice at Home and Abroad and its Enlightenment to China[J].Medical Information,2023,36(14):27.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.21.006]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01