参考文献/References:
[1]Reinhart K,Daniels R,Kissoon N,et al.Recognizing Sepsis as a Global Health Priority-AWHO Resolution[J].N Engl J Med,2017,277(5):414-417.[2]Sun S,Ren H,Wang Y,et al.Respiratory Variations in Aortic Blood Flow to Predict Volume Responsiveness in Ventilated Children With Leukemia and Neutropenic Septic Shock[J].Pediatr Crit Care Med,2020,21(5):e247-e252. [3]Yang WS,Kang HD,Jung SK,et al.A mortality analysis of septic shock, vasoplegic shock and cryptic shock classified by the third international consensus definitions (Sepsis-3)[J].Clin Respir J,2020,14(9):857-863. [4]Levy MM,Evans LE,Rhodes A.The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Bundle: 2018 Update[J].Crit Care Med,2018,46(6):997-1000.[5]Rhodes A,Evans LE,Alhazzani W,et al.Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016[J].Intensive Care Med,2017,43(3):304-377.[6]Chu L,Li G,Yu Y,et al.Clinical effects of hemoperfusion combined with pulse high-volume hemofiltration on septic shock[J].Medicine (Baltimore),2020,99(9):e19058.[7]Zhao P,Zheng R,Xue L,et al.Early Fluid Resuscitation and High Volume Hemofiltration Decrease Septic Shock Progression in Swine[J].Biomed Res Int,2015(2015):181845. [8]李聪,冯宪真,黄马玉,等.心脏超声联合被动抬腿试验评价脓毒性休克患者容量反应性的价值[J].医学综述,2017,23(1):138-140,144.[9]Douglas IS,Alapat PM,Corl KA,et al.Fluid Response Evaluation in Sepsis Hypotension and Shock: A Randomized Clinical Trial[J].Chest,2020,158(4):1431-1445. [10]Rameau A,de With E,Boerma EC.Passive leg raise testing effectively reduces fluid administration in septic shock after correction of non-compliance to test results[J].Ann Intensive Care,2017,7(1):2. [11]申丽旻,龙玲,赵浩天,等.不同指标预测脓毒症休克合并心肌抑制患者容量反应性的准确性:下腔静脉超声指标,PiCCO指标,CVP的比较[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2019,39(5):629-632.[12]李跃东,周翔,王亚朋.每搏变异度,脉搏压变异度的变化评价感染性休克患者容量反应性的临床研究[J].中国医刊,2016,51(10):91-94.[13]彭绵,方伟强,蔡举瑜,等.机械通气脓毒症休克患者下腔静脉管径/呼吸变异指数与中心静脉压的关系[J].内科急危重症杂志,2015,21(5):333-335.[14]Via G,Tavazzi G,Price S.Ten situations where inferior vena cava ultrasound may fail to accurately predict fluid responsiveness: a physiologically based point of view[J].Intensive Care Med,2016,42(7):1164-1167.[15]Guinot PG,de Broca B,Bemard E,et al.Respiratory stroke volume variation assessed by oesophageal Doppler monitoring predicts fluid responsiveness during laparoscopy[J].Br J Anaesth,2014,112(4):600-664.[16]Lu N,Xi X,Jiang L,et al.Exploring the best predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock[J].Am J Emerg Med,2017,35(9):1258-1261.[17]干朝晖,张立群,姚宝锋.超声测量股动脉流速变异率预测容量反应性的临床应用[J].中国基层医药,2016,23(14):2197-2200.[18]卢年芳,姜利,朱波,等.外周动脉峰流速变异度评估感染性休克患者容量反应性的临床研究[J].中华危重病急救医学,2018,30(3):224-229.[19]李吉光,曹立娟,刘素霞,等.超声监测左心不同部位血流速及呼吸变异度的研究[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2018,27(11):1276-1280.
相似文献/References:
[1]陈 伟,王鸿志,陈永权.下腔静脉扩张指数评估机械通气患者
容量反应性价值的Meta分析[J].医学信息,2019,32(12):80.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.12.025]
CHEN Wei,WANG Hong-zhi,CHEN Yong-quan.Meta-analysis of the Value of Inferior Vena Caval Expansion Index in
Evaluating the Volume Reactivity of Mechanical Ventilation Patients[J].Medical Information,2019,32(19):80.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.12.025]
[2]张 雪.乳酸清除率评估严重脓毒症及脓毒性休克预后的价值[J].医学信息,2020,33(16):104.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.16.031]
ZHANG Xue.The Value of Lactate Clearance Rate in Evaluating the Prognosis of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock[J].Medical Information,2020,33(19):104.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.16.031]
[3]林宗钦,商 益,菅洪健,等.床旁超声评估下腔静脉呼吸变异度联合被动抬腿试验在重症脓毒症休克患者中的应用价值[J].医学信息,2023,36(17):142.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.17.029]
LIN Zong-qin,SHANG Yi,JIAN Hong-jian,et al.Application Value of Bedside Ultrasound in Evaluating Inferior Vena Cava Respiratory Variability Combined with Passive Leg Raising Test in Patients with Severe Septic Shock[J].Medical Information,2023,36(19):142.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.17.029]