[1]王焕伶,陈小垒,王美荣,等.修订版记忆行为问题量表的汉化及信效度评价[J].医学信息,2021,34(21):52-57.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.21.013]
　WANG Huan-ling,CHEN Xiao-lei,WANG Mei-rong,et al.Reliability and Validity Evaluation of Chinese Version of Revised Memory and Behavior Problems Checklist[J].Medical Information,2021,34(21):52-57.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.21.013]
点击复制

修订版记忆行为问题量表的汉化及信效度评价()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
34卷
期数:
2021年21期
页码:
52-57
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2021-11-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Reliability and Validity Evaluation of Chinese Version of Revised Memory and Behavior Problems Checklist
文章编号:
1006-1959（2021）21-0052-06
作者:
王焕伶; 陈小垒; 王美荣; 等
（1.首都医科大学全科医学与继续教育学院，北京 100069；2.北京市朝阳区双井社区卫生服务中心全科医学科，北京 100022；3.北京市朝阳区东风社区卫生服务中心全科医学科，北京 100016；4.首都医科大学医学人文学院，北京 100069）
Author(s):
WANG Huan-ling; CHEN Xiao-lei; WANG Mei-rong; et al.
(1.School of General Practice and Continuing Education,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100069,China；2.Department of General Practice,ShuangJing Community Health Service Center of Chaoyang District,Beijing 100022,China；3.Department of General Practice
关键词:
痴呆; 照顾者; 修订版记忆行为问题量表; 信度; 效度
Keywords:
Dementia; Caregivers; Revised Memory and Behavior Problems Checklist; Reliability; Validity
分类号:
R749.1+6
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.21.013
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 对修订版记忆行为问题量表进行汉化并评价其信效度。方法 采用翻译、回译、预试验及研究小组定稿等步骤对量表进行汉化及文化调适。2019年3月-7月在北京某三级甲等医院记忆门诊对210例痴呆患者的照顾者采用汉化后的修订版记忆行为问题量表进行调查。采用项目分析和验证性因子分析对条目进行筛选，采用内部一致性及重测信度对其信度进行评价，采用验证性因子分析对其结构效度进行评价。结果 经条目筛选后中文版修订版记忆行为问题量表共保留19个条目。修订后，两分量表结构效度验证性因子分析近似误差均方根（RMSEA）分别为0.056和0.052；比较拟合指数（CFI）分别为0.900和0.924；Cronbach’s α系数分别为0.802和0.808；重测信度组内相关系数（ICC）分别为0.801（P＝0.001）和0.861（P＜0.001）。结论 经修订后的中文版修订版记忆行为问题量表信效度良好，可以用于痴呆患者的照顾者作为评价痴呆患者记忆行为问题的工具。
Abstract:
Objective To translate the Revised Memory and Behavior Problems Checklist into Chinese and evaluate its reliability and validity.Methods After translation and back translation, the Revised Memory and Behavior Problems Checklist was adjusted according to the translation, back translation, pre-test and finalization of the study group. A total of 210 caregivers of dementia patients were investigated with Chinese version of Revised Memory and Behavior Problems Checklist in the memory clinic of a tertiary hospital in Beijing from March to July 2019. Item analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were applied to select items. Internal consistency and retest reliability were used to evaluate its reliability, and confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate its structural validity.Results After adjustment, the Chinese version of Revised Memory and Behavior Problems Checklist retained 19 items. After the scale was revised, the results of structural validity showed the approximation error of two subscales were 0.056 and 0.052, the comparative fit index of two subscales were 0.900 and 0.924. The Cronbach’s α of the two revised subscales were 0.802 and 0.808, and the intraclass correlation (ICC) were 0.801 (P=0.001) and 0.861 (P＜0.001) respectively.Conclusion The Chinese version of Revised Memory and Behavior Problems Checklist has good reliability and validity, which could be used by caregivers of dementia patients as a tool to evaluate the memory and behavioral problems of dementia patients.

参考文献/References:

[1]中国痴呆与认知障碍指南写作组,中国医师协会神经内科医师分会认知障碍疾病专业委员会.2018中国痴呆与认知障碍诊治指南(一)：痴呆及其分类诊断标准[J].中华医学杂志,2018,98(13):965.[2]Gerlach LB,Kales HC.Managing Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia[J].Psychiatr Clin North Am,2018,41(1):127-139.[3]Reisberg B,Monteiro I,Torossian C,et al.The BEHAVE-AD assessment system: a perspective, a commentary on new findings, and a historical review[J].Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord,2014,38(1-2):89-146.[4]毛艳.多感官刺激对老年期痴呆患者精神行为症状、认知功能及生活质量的影响分析[J].中国医学前沿杂志（电子版）,2018,10(2):97-101.[5]Chen S,Lin K,Wang H,et al.Reliability and structural validity of the Chinese version of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory, Nursing Home version[J].Psychogeriatrics,2018,18(2):113-122.[6]Teri L,Truax P,Logsdon R,et al.Assessment of behavioral problems in dementia: the revised memory and behavior problems checklist[J].Psychol Aging,1992,7(4):622-631.[7]Reisberg B,Borenstein J,Salob SP,et al.Behavioral symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease: Phenomenology and treatment[J].J Clin Psychiatry,1987(48):9-15.[8]Tew CW,Tan LF,Luo N,et al.Why Family Caregivers Choose to Institutionalize a Loved One with Dementia: A Singapore Perspective[J].Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord,2010,30(6):509-516.[9]Tremont G,Davis J,Papandonatos GD,et al.A telephone intervention for dementia caregivers: background, design, and baseline characteristics[J].Contemp Clin Trials,2013,36(2):338-347.[10]Sadavoy J,Sajedinejad S,Chiu M.Evaluation of the Reitman Centre CARERS program for supporting dementia family caregivers: a pre-post intervention study[J].Int Psychogeriatr,2021(18):1-12.[11]Fuh JL,Liu CY,Wang SJ,et al.Revised memory and behavior problems checklist in Taiwanese patients with Alzheimer’s disease[J].Int Psychogeriatr,1999,11(2):181-189.[12]Salvia MG,Dawidowski A,Schapira M,et al.Spanish Revised Memory and Behavior Problems Checklist Scale (Sp-RMBPC): trans-cultural adaptation and validation of the RMBPC questionnaire[J].Int Psychogeriatr,2011,23(7):1160-1166.[13]Ottoboni G,Amici S,Iannizzi P,et al.Italian revised memory and behavior problems checklist (It-RMBPC): validation and psychometric properties in Alzheimer’s disease caregivers[J].Aging Clin Exp Res,2019(31):527-537.[14]吴明隆.结构方程模型——AMOS的操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆出版社,2019.[15]Anderson JC,Gerbing DW.The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis[J].Psychometrika,1984,49(2):155-173.[16]蒋小花,沈卓之,张楠楠,等.问卷的信度和效度分析[J].现代预防医学,2010,37(3):429-431.[17]王永利,张振香,林蓓蕾,等.用药生活问卷的汉化及其在社区老年多重用药患者中的信效度分析[J].中国全科医学,2020,23(15):1864-1872.[18]郝立晓,胡笑晨,韩璎,等.英文版主观认知下降问卷的汉化及信效度分析[J].中国全科医学,2019,22(26):3238-3245.[19]Nogales-González C,Losada A,Romero-Moreno R.Confirmatory factor analysis of the Spanish version of the revised memory and behavior problems checklist[J].Int Psychogeriatr,2015,27(4):683-692.[20]吴明隆.问卷的统计分析实务——SPSS操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2020.[21]屈芳,马旭玲,罗林明.调查问卷的信度分析及其影响因素研究[J].继续教育,2015,29(1):32-34.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘 波,罗文静,张 翼,等.血清脂联素水平与轻度认知功能障碍的相关性研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(10):7.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.10.003]
　LIU Bo,LUO Wen-jing,ZHANG Yi,et al.Correlation between Serum Adiponectin Level and Mild Cognitive Impairment[J].Medical Information,2018,31(21):7.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.10.003]
[2]张怀祥,段晓宇.脑梗死后认知障碍的病理学机制、相关危险因素及治疗[J].医学信息,2018,31(16):21.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.16.007]
　ZHANG Huai-xiang,DUAN Xiao-yu.Pathological Mechanism,Related Risk Factors and Treatment of Cognitive Impairment after Cerebral Infarction[J].Medical Information,2018,31(21):21.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.16.007]
[3]凌 梅,刘静芳.精神分裂症患者研究伙伴的相关研究进展[J].医学信息,2018,31(19):48.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.19.016]
　LING Mei,LIU Jing-fang.Progress in Research on Research Partners in Patients with Schizophrenia[J].Medical Information,2018,31(21):48.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.19.016]
[4]肖辛怡,严玉宁,魏文石.轻度行为损害的研究[J].医学信息,2019,32(13):49.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.13.015]
　XIAO Xin-yi,YAN Yu-ning,WEI Wen-shi.The Research of Mild Behavioral Damage[J].Medical Information,2019,32(21):49.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.13.015]
[5]陆昕昀,仲 骏.消化道肿瘤手术患者照顾者照护知识需求调查及影响因素分析[J].医学信息,2019,32(19):71.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.19.021]
　LU Xin-yun,ZHONG Jun.Investigation on the Needs of Caregivers'Care Knowledge and Analysis of Influencing Factors in Patients with Digestive Tract Cancer Surgery[J].Medical Information,2019,32(21):71.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.19.021]
[6]焦燕琴,李 青,张 政.脑瘫照顾者积极感受与生活质量的相关性分析[J].医学信息,2020,33(14):123.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.14.037]
　JIAO Yan-qin,LI Qing,ZHANG Zheng.Correlation Analysis of Positive Feelings and Quality of Life of Caregivers of Cerebral Palsy[J].Medical Information,2020,33(21):123.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.14.037]
[7]梁桂琤,钟国强,李金轶.心房颤动与认知障碍的相关性研究[J].医学信息,2020,33(20):21.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.20.007]
　LIANG Gui-cheng,ZHONG Guo-qiang,LI Jin-yi.Study on the Correlation Between Atrial Fibrillation and Cognitive Impairment[J].Medical Information,2020,33(21):21.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.20.007]
[8]倪圆圆,石 嫣,张召弟,等.基于WOS数据库近十年老年性痴呆照顾者研究热点分析[J].医学信息,2021,34(10):5.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.10.002]
　WOS Database.Analysis of Research Hotspots in Caregivers of Alzheimer’s Disease in Recent Ten Years Based on NI Yuan-yuan,SHI Yan,ZHANG Zhao-di,et al.[J].Medical Information,2021,34(21):5.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.10.002]
[9]张亦晗,刘晓戈,喻玲玲,等.中青年经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后患者配偶照顾者疾病获益感现状及影响因素分析[J].医学信息,2023,36(03):53.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.03.012]
　ZHANG Yi-han,LIU Xiao-ge,YU Ling-ling,et al.Analysis of the Status Quo and Influencing Factors of Perceived Caregiving Benefits of Spouse Caregivers of Young and Middle-aged Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention[J].Medical Information,2023,36(21):53.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.03.012]
[10]陈 卉,苏竹敏,马晓萌,等.国内外痴呆及认知功能障碍患者语言与交际障碍研究的可视化分析[J].医学信息,2023,36(13):51.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.13.009]
　CHEN Hui,SU Zhu-min,MA Xiao-meng,et al.Visual Analysis of Language and Communication Disorders in Patients with Dementia and Cognitive Impairment at Home and Abroad[J].Medical Information,2023,36(21):51.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.13.009]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01