[1]张国富.阶梯式颅内减压技术在急性重度颅脑损伤治疗中的应用价值[J].医学信息,2021,34(22):97-99.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.22.029]
　ZHANG Guo-fu.Application Value of Stepped Intracranial Decompression in the Treatment of Acute Severe Craniocerebral Injury[J].Medical Information,2021,34(22):97-99.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.22.029]
点击复制

阶梯式颅内减压技术在急性重度颅脑损伤治疗中的应用价值()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
34卷
期数:
2021年22期
页码:
97-99
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2021-11-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application Value of Stepped Intracranial Decompression in the Treatment of Acute Severe Craniocerebral Injury
文章编号:
1006-1959（2021）22-0097-03
作者:
张国富
（天津市宁河区医院神经外科，天津 301500）
Author(s):
ZHANG Guo-fu
(Department of Neurosurgery,Tianjin Ninghe District Hospital,Tianjin 301500,China)
关键词:
阶梯式颅内减压技术; 重度颅脑损伤; 格拉斯哥昏迷评分
Keywords:
Stepped intracranial decompression technique; Severe craniocerebral injury; Glasgow coma score
分类号:
R651.15
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.22.029
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 研究阶梯式颅内减压技术在急性重度颅脑损伤治疗中的应用价值。方法 选取2019年3月-2021年3月来我院诊治的60例急性重度颅脑损伤患者为研究对象，采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组，各30例。对照组采用常规减压术治疗，观察组采用阶梯式颅内减压技术治疗，比较两组临床手术指标、格拉斯哥昏迷（GCS）评分、并发症发生率以及预后效果。结果 观察组手术时间、术中出血量均小于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；观察组GCS评分为（17.45±2.98）分，高于对照组的（12.90±3.14）分，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；观察组并发症总发生率低于对照组，但差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。观察组预后良好、中残占比均高于对照组，重残、植物状态以及死亡占比低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 阶梯式颅内减压技术可缩短急性重度颅脑损伤患者手术时间，减少术中出血量，降低术后并发症发生率，改善脑损伤程度及预后效果，对提高急性重型颅脑损伤的救治效果具有重要的临床意义。
Abstract:
Objective To study the application value of stepped intracranial decompression in the treatment of acute severe craniocerebral injury.Methods Sixty patients with acute severe craniocerebral injury diagnosed and treated in our hospital from March 2019 to March 2021 were selected as the research objects. They were divided into control group and observation group by random number table method, with 30 cases in each group. The control group was treated with conventional decompression, and the observation group was treated with stepped intracranial decompression. The clinical operation indexes, Glasgow coma score(GCS), incidence of complications and prognosis of the two groups were compared.Results The operation time and intraoperative blood loss of the observation group were less than those of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The GCS score of the observation group was (17.45±2.98) scores, which was higher than (12.90±3.14) scores of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The total incidence of complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The proportion of good prognosis and moderate disability in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, while the proportion of severe disability, plant status and death in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion Stepped intracranial decompression technology can shorten the operation time of patients with acute severe craniocerebral injury, reduce intraoperative blood loss, reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, improve the degree of brain injury and prognosis, and has important clinical significance for improving the treatment effect of acute severe craniocerebral injury.

参考文献/References:

[1]陈龙钦,谢泽锋.骨瓣减压术对150 例颅脑损伤患者的疗效分析[J].当代医学,2015,21(17):16-17.[2]李长明.两种不同减压术在治疗重型颅脑损伤中的临床评价[J].中国医药指南,2016,14(13):152.[3]蒋向东.阶梯式颅内减压技术在急性重型颅脑损伤治疗中的临床效果分析[J].系统医学,2018,3(10):70-72.[4]Pervez M,Kitagawa RS,Chang TR.Definition of Traumatic Brain Injury, Neurosurgery, Trauma Orthopedics, Neuroimaging, Psychology, and Psychiatry in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury [J].Neuroimaging Clin N Am,2018,28(1):1-13.[5]张勇,杨玉元,蒋小文.重型颅脑损伤术后迟发性出血31例患者的临床观察[J].甘肃医药,2015,34(6):450-451.[6]中华医学会神经病学分会神经重症协作组,中国医师协会神经内科医师分会神经重症专业委员会.难治性颅内压增高监测与治疗中国专家共识[J].中华医学杂志,2018,98(45):3643-3652.[7]刘晓鹏.阶梯式颅内减压技术在急性重度颅脑损伤治疗中的应用价值[J].中国现代药物应用,2019,13(16):26-27.[8]陈明忠.颅内压监测在重度颅脑损伤患者中的应用价值[J].现代实用医学,2017,29(2):198.[9]钟治军,段继新.梯度减压技术在急性重型颅脑损伤术中的疗效分析[J].湘南学院学报(医学版),2015(4):27-29.[10]尚恒夫.梯度减压技术用于急性重型颅脑损伤术中的效果观察[J].中国继续医学教育,2017,9(25):75-76.[11]何乾,张银善,刘静.侧脑室外引流在急性重症颅脑损伤治疗中的应用研究[J].解放军预防医学杂志,2019,37(3):115-116.[12]王睿勤.不同去骨瓣减压手术治疗重型颅脑损伤的临床疗效和安全性分析[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志,2016,19(16):98-99.[13]Ferreira CB,Bassi E,Lucena L,et al.Measurement of intracranial pressure and short-term outcomes of patients with traumatic brain injury: a propensity-matched analysis[J].Rev Bras Ter Intensiva,2015,27(4):315-321.[14]梁永祥.阶梯式颅内减压技术在急性重度颅脑损伤中应用价值[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2015(32):4896-4897.[15]张雄.阶梯式颅内减压技术在急性重度颅脑损伤治疗中的应用价值[J].当代医学,2017,23(29):136-137.[16]李晓斌,苏忠周.脑室型颅内压监测在控制性阶梯式减压术中的应用[J].浙江创伤外科,2018,23(6):1077-1079.[17]魏宇,李普.分析在急性重度颅脑损伤患者的治疗中阶梯式颅内减压技术的应用效果[J].心血管外科杂志,2017,6(4):399-400.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01