[1]杨小强,丁 伟,张小亮,等.不同浓度罗哌卡因行胸椎旁神经阻滞麻醉对老年胸腔镜肺叶切除术患者围手术期镇痛的效果[J].医学信息,2021,34(24):131-134.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.24.033]
 YANG Xiao-qiang,DING Wei,ZHANG Xiao-liang,et al.Perioperative Analgesic Effect of Different Concentrations of Ropivacaine for Thoracic Paravertebral Block Anesthesia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Thoracoscopic Lobectomy[J].Medical Information,2021,34(24):131-134.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.24.033]
点击复制

不同浓度罗哌卡因行胸椎旁神经阻滞麻醉对老年胸腔镜肺叶切除术患者围手术期镇痛的效果()
分享到:

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
34卷
期数:
2021年24期
页码:
131-134
栏目:
药物与临床
出版日期:
2021-12-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Perioperative Analgesic Effect of Different Concentrations of Ropivacaine for Thoracic Paravertebral Block Anesthesia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Thoracoscopic Lobectomy
文章编号:
1006-1959(2021)24-0131-04
作者:
杨小强丁 伟张小亮
(高州市人民医院麻醉科,广东 高州 525200)
Author(s):
YANG Xiao-qiangDING WeiZHANG Xiao-lianget al.
(Department of Anesthesiology,Gaozhou People’s Hospital,Gaozhou 525200,Guangdong,China)
关键词:
胸椎旁神经阻滞麻醉围手术期镇痛胸腔镜肺叶切除术罗哌卡因
Keywords:
Paravertebral block anesthesiaPerioperative analgesiaThoracoscopic lobectomyRopivacaine
分类号:
R734.2
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.24.033
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 研究不同浓度罗哌卡因行胸椎旁神经阻滞麻醉(PVB)在老年患者胸腔镜肺叶切除术(VATS)中的镇痛效果。方法 选取2020年3月-2021年2月于我院行VATS治疗的74例老年患者,按照随机数字表法分为A组(n=25)、B组(n=25)、C组(n=24)。所有患者均于术前行罗哌卡因PVB麻醉,A、B、C组罗哌卡因浓度分别为0.25%、0.50%、0.75%,比较三组不同状态(静息、咳嗽)、不同时间(术后5 min、术后2 h、12 h)疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、苏醒时间、拔管时间、补救镇痛情况、围术期体征指标[心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)]、舒芬太尼与间羟胺的使用剂量、麻醉并发症。结果 三组术后2 h、12 h VAS评分均有下降,且B组、C组VAS评分低于A组(P<0.05),但B组、C组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);A组、B组苏醒时间及拔管时间短于C组,而B组、C组补救镇痛情况少于A组(P<0.05);C组围术期HR、MAP水平存在明显波动,且与A、B组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而A组与B组围术期HR、MAP水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);舒芬太尼使用剂量由高到低依次为B组、A组、C组,间羟胺使用剂量由高到低依次为C组、A组、B组(P<0.05);C组麻醉并发症高于A组、B组(P<0.05),而A组、B组麻醉并发症比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 0.50%浓度罗哌卡因PVB麻醉在老年患者VATS方案中具有理想效果,其镇痛效果与高浓度相似,但围术期血流动力学更为稳定,且药物用量少于低浓度方案,麻醉并发症风险低。
Abstract:
Objective To study the analgesic effect of different concentrations of ropivacaine for thoracic paravertebral block (PVB) anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS).Methods A total of 74 elderly patients who underwent VATS in our hospital from March 2020 to February 2021 were randomly divided into group A (n=25), group B (n=25) and group C (n=24). All patients were anesthetized with ropivacaine PVB before operation. The concentrations of ropivacaine in groups A, B and C were 0.25%, 0.50% and 0.75%, respectively. The visual analogue scale (VAS) of different states (rest, cough) and different times (5 min, 2 h and 12 h after operation), recovery time, extubation time, remedial analgesia, perioperative signs [heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP)], dosage of sufentanil and m-hydroxylamine, and anesthesia complications were compared among the three groups.Results The VAS scores at 2 h and 12 h after operation in the three groups were decreased, and the VAS scores in groups B and C were lower than those in group A (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between groups B and C (P>0.05). The recovery time and extubation time in groups A and B were shorter than those in group C, while salvage analgesia in groups B and C was less than that in group A (P<0.05). Perioperative HR and MAP levels in group C fluctuated significantly, and were statistically different from groups A and B (P<0.05), while there was no statistically significant difference in HR and MAP levels in groups A and B during perioperative period (P>0.05). The dosage of sufentanil was group B, group A, and group C from high to low, and the dosage of metahydroxylamine was group C, group A, and group B from high to low (P<0.05). Anesthesia complications in group C were higher than those in groups A and B (P<0.05), while there was no significant difference in anesthesia complications in groups A and B (P>0.05).Conclusion The 0.50% ropivacaine PVB anesthesia has ideal effect in elderly patients with VATS scheme, and its analgesic effect is similar to that of high concentration, but the perioperative hemodynamics is more stable, and the drug dosage is less than that of low concentration scheme, and the risk of anesthesia complications is low.

参考文献/References:

[1]张俊燕,武月玲,赵丰丽,等.超声引导下罗派卡因复合右美托咪定用于竖脊肌阻滞对胸腔镜下肺叶切除术后镇痛效果影响[J].临床军医杂志,2021,49(8):900-902.[2]盛芳,李男,谭文斐,等.右美托咪定或地塞米松复合罗哌卡因对椎旁神经阻滞效果的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2021,37(2):150-154.[3]胡礼宏,徐霞,贺靳贤,等.胸腔镜直视下椎旁阻滞在胸科手术术后镇痛中的应用[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,2020,36(12):757-760.[4]陈慧娟,张阳,石梦竹,等.老年患者胸腔镜肺叶切除术前行胸椎旁神经阻滞所需罗哌卡因的最佳药物浓度观察[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2021,42(3):258-262.[5]王青,余琅,高之心,等.右美托咪定联合罗哌卡因超声引导下单次竖脊肌平面阻滞对胸腔镜下肺叶切除术后镇痛效果的影响[J].中华疼痛学杂志,2020,16(2):130-135.[6]林建,李加宾,张文清,等.右美托咪定联合罗哌卡因胸椎旁神经阻滞在胸腔镜下肺叶切除术患者中的应用价值[J].中外医疗,2020,39(36):101-103.[7]Deshpande JP,Ghodki PS,Sardesai SP.The Analgesic Efficacy of Dexamethasone Added to Ropivacaine in Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Transabdominal Hysterectomy under Subarachnoid Block[J].Anesth Essays Res,2017,11(2):499-502.[8]姚景余,林于南,张茹,等.氢吗啡酮复合罗哌卡因胸椎旁阻滞对胸腔镜肺叶切除术后镇痛的影响[J].中国新药与临床杂志,2019,38(11):669-672.[9]吴越,温超.右美托咪定联合罗哌卡因行胸椎旁神经阻滞对胸腔镜下肺叶切除术的老年患者术后镇痛的影响[J].大连医科大学学报,2019,41(5):433-437.[10]冯超群.罗哌卡因配伍芬太尼胸椎旁阻滞用于胸腔镜下肺叶切除术的效果[J].广东医学,2016,37(2):214-217.[11]徐锋,杨玉珍,吴彬.罗哌卡因肋间神经阻滞及胸椎旁神经阻滞对胸腔镜肺叶切除术后镇痛效果的影响[J].临床误诊误治,2020,33(9):102-107.[12]黄晨晨,刘金,王爽,等.罗哌卡因复合地塞米松胸椎旁神经阻滞对胸腔镜下肺叶切除术患者术后镇痛效果与恢复质量的影响[J].医学研究杂志,2020,49(5):156-159,169.[13]高美玲,蔡强,蒙臣,等.不同浓度罗哌卡因对肺叶切除术竖脊肌阻滞效果的分析[J].中国现代手术学杂志,2019,23(2):150-153.[14]张琰,刘婕婷,王迎斌,等.单点胸椎旁注射不同浓度罗哌卡因在胸腔镜下肺叶切除术中的应用[J].甘肃医药,2018,37(5):385-389.[15]司建洛,苏跃,宋绍团.肺叶切除术患者右美托咪定复合罗哌卡胸椎旁神经阻滞镇痛效果研究[J].临床肺科杂志,2018,23(9):1703-1705,1708.[16]付建楠,齐艳芳,陈宇,等.单孔胸腔镜术后罗哌卡因复合右美托咪啶前锯肌平面阻滞联合静脉镇痛效果[J].武警医学,2020,31(11):983-986.[17]谢海辉,张曙,周建平,等.胸椎旁神经阻滞联合全麻对肺叶切除术老年患者术后认知功能障碍的影响[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2018,38(7):793-796.[18]唐蓉,王迎斌,刘伟,等.舒芬太尼局部用药对罗哌卡因胸椎旁神经阻滞半数有效浓度的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2020,36(6):544-547.[19]张博,刘丹彦.胸椎旁神经阻滞在胸腔镜肺叶切除术中的应用:随机对照试验[J].南方医科大学学报,2017,37(4):460-464.[20]郭金成,卢家彬,乔呈瑞,等.胸腔镜下椎旁间隙置管镇痛在胸腔镜肺叶切除手术中的应用[J].中国内镜杂志,2021,27(2):8-13.[21]胡礼宏,徐霞,沈韦羽,等.胸腔镜下胸椎旁阻滞在单孔胸腔镜肺叶切除术镇痛中的应用[J].中华医学杂志,2020,100(33):2596-2600.[22]王菲,罗太君,高广阔,等.胸椎旁程控间歇脉冲注药对胸腔镜肺叶切除患者术后急性疼痛和早期恢复质量的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2021,37(6):607-611.[23]杨勤勤,万政佐,刘胜强,等.罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼连续竖脊肌平面阻滞在胸腔镜下肺叶切除术中的应用[J].浙江中西医结合杂志,2020,30(5):397-401.[24]夏玉中,邢飞,卜慧莲,等.麻醉因素对胸腔镜肺叶切除术患者术后早期转归的影响:超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞联合全身麻醉的效果[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2018,38(11):1331-1334.[25]朱斌斌,孙健,陈福贵,等.不同浓度罗哌卡因胸段硬膜外麻醉在非插管胸腔镜肺叶楔形切除术中的效果观察[J].浙江医学,2017,39(5):374-377.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01