[1]喻燕波,王志剑,赵 勇,等.射频热凝术联合胶原酶化学溶解术治疗青少年腰椎间盘突出症的效果[J].医学信息,2022,35(02):124-126.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.02.030]
　YU Yan-bo,WANG Zhi-jian,ZHAO Yong,et al.Effect of Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation Combined with Collagenase Chemolysisin the Treatment of Adolescent Lumbar Disc Herniation[J].Medical Information,2022,35(02):124-126.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.02.030]
点击复制

射频热凝术联合胶原酶化学溶解术治疗青少年腰椎间盘突出症的效果()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2022年02期
页码:
124-126
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2022-01-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation Combined with Collagenase Chemolysisin the Treatment of Adolescent Lumbar Disc Herniation
文章编号:
1006-1959（2022）02-0124-03
作者:
喻燕波; 王志剑; 赵 勇; 邱觅真; 俞志强
南昌大学第一附属医院疼痛科，江西 南昌 330006
Author(s):
YU Yan-bo; WANG Zhi-jian; ZHAO Yong; QIU Mi-zhen; YU Zhi-qiang
Department of Pain,the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University,Nanchang 330006,Jiangxi,China
关键词:
射频热凝术; 胶原酶化学溶解术; 青少年腰椎间盘突出症
Keywords:
Radiofrequency thermocoagulation; Collagenase chemolysis laminectomy; Adolescent lumbar disc herniation
分类号:
R687.3
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.02.030
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 比较射频热凝术联合低剂量胶原酶化学溶解术与单侧开窗髓核摘除术治疗青少年腰椎间盘突出症的效果。方法 选取2019年6月-2020年6月我院收治的青少年腰椎间盘突出症患者65例，根据治疗方式不同分为A组33例，B组32例。A组予以射频热凝术联合胶原酶化学溶解术治疗，B组予以单侧开窗减压术治疗，比较两组疼痛程度、腰椎功能恢复情况及围手术期指标。结果 两组术后1周、3个月VAS评分低于术前，且A组术后3个月VAS评分低于B组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；两组术后1周、3个月JOA评分高于术前，且A组术后3个月JOA评分高于B组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；A组术中失血量、手术时间、住院时间及费用优于B组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05），而两组术后下床时间比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论 腰椎间盘胶原酶溶解联合射频热凝术治疗青少年腰椎间盘突出症优于单侧开窗减压术治疗，具有术后恢复快、手术及住院时间短、术中出血量少、住院费用低等优点，但由于样本数量有限，仍有待进一步研究证实。
Abstract:
Objective To compare the efficacy of radiofrequency thermocoagulation combined with low-dose collagenase chemolysis and unilateral fenestration discectomy in the treatment of adolescent lumbar disc herniation.Methods A total of 65 cases of adolescent lumbar disc herniation admitted to our hospital from June 2019 to June 2020 were selected and divided into group A (33 cases) and group B (32 cases) according to different treatment methods. Group A was treated with radiofrequency thermocoagulation combined with collagenase chemolysis, and group B was treated with unilateral fenestration decompression. The pain degree, lumbar function recovery and perioperative indexes were compared between the two groups.Results The VAS scores of the two groups at 1 week and 3 months after operation were lower than those before operation, and the VAS score of group A was lower than that of group B at 3 months after operation, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The JOA scores of the two groups at 1 week and 3 months after operation were higher than those before operation, and the JOA score of group A was higher than that of group B at 3 months after operation, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The intraoperative blood loss, operation time, hospitalization time and cost of group A were better than those of group B, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05), there was no significant difference in postoperative ambulation time between the two groups (P>0.05).Conclusion Lumbar disc collagenase dissolution combined with radiofrequency thermocoagulation is superior to unilateral fenestration decompression in the treatment of adolescent lumbar disc herniation. It has the advantages of rapid postoperative recovery, short operation and hospitalization time, less intraoperative blood loss and low hospitalization cost. However, due to the limited number of samples, further research is still needed to confirm.

参考文献/References:

[1]刘伟,荆珏华,陈磊,等.经皮椎间孔镜术治疗青少年腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效[J].局解手术学杂志,2018,27(12):876-879.[2]Li H,Jiang C,Mu X,et al.Comparison of MED and PELD in the treatment of adolescent lumbar disc herniation:a 5-year follow-up[J].World Neurosurg,2018(112):e255-e260.[3]Raghu ALB,Wiggins A,Kandasamy J.Surgical management of lumbar disc herniation in children and adolescents[J].Clin Neurol Neurosurg,2019(185):105486. [4]郭超,牛东阳,刘佳,等.经皮内镜下腰椎间盘摘除术治疗伴腰椎管狭窄的单节段腰椎间盘突症术后复发的影响因素[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2021,31(7):619-625.[5]余磊.微创治疗和保守治疗在治疗腰椎间盘突出症中的应用对比[J].包头医学院学报,2017,33(1):34-35.[6]党礌,陈仲强,刘晓光,等.青少年下腰椎间盘突出症的病因分析——腰椎过度承载及腰骶部骨与关节形态变异在发病中的意义[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2015,25(11):991-996.[7]李渊,石俊俊,任捷,等.肥胖与青少年腰椎间盘突出症发病关系[J].中国骨伤,2020,33(8):725-729.[8]Xu Z,Liu Y,Chen J.Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy for L5-S1 Adolescent Lumbar Disc Herniation[J].Turk Neurosurg,2018,28(6):923-928. [9]Nakamae T,Fujimoto Y,Yamada K,et al.Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation in athletes under the local anesthesia[J].J Orthop Sci,2019,24(6):1015-1019. [10]Karademir M,Eser O,Karavelioglu E.Adolescent lumbar disc herniation: Impact, diagnosis, and treatment[J].J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil,2017,30(2):347-352.[11]Liu W,Li Q,Li Z,et al.Clinical efficacy of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy in treating adolescent lumbar disc herniation[J].Medicine (Baltimore),2019,98(9):e14682. [12]Choi KC,Lee DC,Shim HK,et al.A Strategy of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Migrated Disc Herniation[J].World Neurosurg,2017(99):259-266. [13]戴锋,俞鹏飞,刘锦涛,等.非手术治疗破裂型腰椎间盘突出症5年随访研究[J].中国骨伤,2020,33(5):414-419.[14]Sussman BJ,Mann M.Experimental Intervertebral discolysis with collagenase[J].J Nenrosurg,1969(31):628-635.[15]Sussman BJ,Bromley JW,Gomez JC.Injection of collagenase in the treatment of herniated lumbar discs[J].JAMA,1981,245(7):730-732．[16]幸泽艇,王梅,张春元,等.射频消融术联合小剂量胶原酶化学溶解术治疗神经根型颈椎病的疗效评价[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2019,25(10):758-764.[17]邱觅真.脊柱内镜技术与胶原酶化学溶解术治疗椎间孔外型腰椎间盘突出症的临床比较研究[D].南昌:南昌大学,2017.[18]李胜利,肖正军.椎间孔镜下髓核摘除术联合脊神经后内侧支射频热凝术治疗腰椎间盘突出症合并腰椎关节源性腰腿痛患者的疗效[J].中华疼痛学杂志,2021,17(4):392-397. [19]于红光.椎间盘靶点射频热凝术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效[J].广东医学,2020,41(5):520-524,530.[20]程昌志,李贵谦,董兴成,等.椎间盘镜联合射频消融术治疗多节段腰椎间盘突出症[J].中国现代手术学杂志,2019,23(1):56-59.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01