[1]金 英.维甲酸联合亚砷酸治疗急性早幼粒细胞白血病的疗效及对患者血清TAT、TM、PIC水平的影响[J].医学信息,2022,35(10):126-129.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.10.030]
 JIN Ying.The Curative Effect of Retinoic Acid Combined with Arsenic Acid in the Treatment of Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia and its Effect on Serum TAT, TM and PIC Levels[J].Medical Information,2022,35(10):126-129.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.10.030]
点击复制

维甲酸联合亚砷酸治疗急性早幼粒细胞白血病的疗效及对患者血清TAT、TM、PIC水平的影响()
分享到:

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2022年10期
页码:
126-129
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2022-05-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Curative Effect of Retinoic Acid Combined with Arsenic Acid in the Treatment of Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia and its Effect on Serum TAT, TM and PIC Levels
文章编号:
1006-1959(2022)10-0126-04
作者:
金 英
(佳木斯市中心医院血液内科,黑龙江 佳木斯 154002)
Author(s):
JIN Ying
(Department of Hematology,Jiamusi Central Hospital,Jiamusi 154002,Heilongjiang,China)
关键词:
急性早幼粒细胞白血病维甲酸亚砷酸凝血功能
Keywords:
Acute promyelocytic leukemiaRetinoic acidArsenious acidCoagulation function
分类号:
R733.7
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.10.030
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探究维甲酸联合亚砷酸治疗急性早幼粒细胞白血病(APL)的临床疗效以及对血清凝血酶-抗凝血酶复合物(TAT)、血栓调节蛋白(TM)、纤溶酶-α2纤溶酶抑制剂复合物(PIC)水平的影响。方法 选择2018年1月-2019年1月于佳木斯市中心医院治疗的80例APL患者为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,各40例。对照组采用维甲酸治疗,观察组在对照组基础上联合亚砷酸治疗,比较两组临床疗效、凝血功能指标(TAT、TM、PIC)、临床指标(临床症状缓解、高白细胞血症持续和异常凝血指标恢复时间)、血液指标(白细胞计数、早幼粒细胞比例)、治疗后1年和2年生存率及不良反应发生情况。结果 观察组总有效率为92.50%,高于对照组的82.50%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组TAT、TM、PIC水平均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组临床症状缓解时间、高白细胞血症持续时间、异常凝血指标恢复时间均短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组白细胞计数、早幼粒细胞比例均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组治疗后1、2年生存率与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组不良反应发生率与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 维甲酸联合亚砷酸治疗APL效果确切,可改善凝血功能,减少白细胞计数和早幼粒细胞比例,缩短临床症状缓解、凝血功能异常恢复以及高白细胞持续时间,且不会增加临床不良反应,是一种安全、有效的治疗方案。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of retinoic acid combined with arsenic acid in the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) and its effect on serum thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT), thrombomodulin (TM) and plasminogen-α2 plasminogen inhibitor complex (PIC) levels.Methods A total of 80 patients with APL who were treated in Jiamusi Central Hospital from January 2018 to January 2019 were selected as the study subjects. They were divided into observation group and control group by random number table method, with 40 cases in each group. The control group was treated with retinoic acid, and the observation group was treated with arsenic trioxide on the basis of the control group. The clinical efficacy, coagulation function indexes (TAT, TM, PIC), clinical indexes (remission of clinical symptoms, duration of hyperleukemia and recovery time of abnormal coagulation indexes), blood indexes (white blood cell count and promyelocyte ratio), 1-year and 2-year survival rates after treatment, and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.Results The total effective rate of the observation group was 92.50%, which was higher than 82.50% of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); The levels of TAT, TM and PIC in the observation group were lower than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); The remission time of clinical symptoms, duration of hyperleukemia and recovery time of abnormal coagulation indexes in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05); The white blood cell count and the proportion of promyelocyte in the observation group were lower than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); There was no significant difference in the 1-year and 2-year survival rates between the observation group and the control group after treatment (P>0.05); There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the observation group and the control group (P>0.05).Conclusion Retinoic acid combined with arsenic acid is effective in the treatment of APL, which can improve coagulation function, reduce white blood cell count and promyelocyte ratio, and does not increase clinical adverse reactions. It is a safe and effective treatment plan.

参考文献/References:

[1]刘仁涛.小剂量维甲酸联合亚砷酸治疗急性早幼粒细胞白血病疗效分析[J].中国血液流变学杂志,2018,28(2):142-144.[2]吴雅雪,胡晓慧,陈苏宁,等.不同剂量蒽环类药物诱导治疗初诊急性早幼粒细胞白血病的疗效与安全性评价[J].中国实验血液学杂志,2019,27(4):1033-1039.[3]闻艳.亚砷酸联合维甲酸化疗治疗急性早幼粒细胞白血病疗效观察[J].河北医学,2016,22(9):1430-1432,1433.[4]刘冯,秦小虎,肖丁华.全反式维甲酸联合亚砷酸治疗初诊急性早幼粒细胞白血病的临床效果[J].医学信息,2020,33(12):67-69.[5]李艳,刘凯奇,宫本法,等.亚砷酸联合维甲酸及化疗治疗复发急性早幼粒细胞白血病的疗效分析[J].中国实验血液学杂志,2020,28(1):1-6.[6]王琨,张建华,张睿娟,等.伴白细胞计数异常的B细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤临床特征及预后分析[J].首都医科大学学报,2018,39(3)327-334.[7]张弋慧智,隋美娟,张卓,等.亚砷酸治疗急性早幼粒细胞白血病的毒副反应及其防治[J].现代肿瘤医学,2018,26(20):3314-3317.[8]中华医学会血液学分会白血病淋巴瘤学组.复发难治性急性髓系白血病中国诊疗指南(2017年版)[J].中华血液学杂志,2017,38(3):183-184.[9]Arber DA,Orazi A,Hasserjian R,et al.The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia[J].Blood,2016,127(20):2391-2405.[10]姚丹丹,戴海滨,姜永芳,等.亚砷酸+全反式维甲酸联合高三尖杉酯碱治疗急性早幼粒细胞白血病的临床观察[J].哈尔滨医科大学学报,2017,51(2):153-155.[11]Platzbecker U,Avvisati G,Cicconi L,et al.Improved outcomes with retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide compared with retinoic acid and chemotherapy in non–high-risk acute promyelocytic leukemia:final results of the randomized Italian-German APL0406 trial[J].Journal of Clinical Oncology,2017,35(6):605-612.[12]胡鸣旭,张春.亚砷酸系统疗法治疗急性早幼粒细胞白血病回顾分析[J].中国中医药科技,2021,28(4):577-579.[13]张元元,王林娅,张瑞东,等.砷剂在儿童急性早幼粒细胞白血病治疗中的安全性病例系列报告[J].中国循证儿科杂志,2018,13(4):259-263.[14]马爻芳,王锐,聂泽强,等.全反式维甲酸联合三氧化二砷治疗急性早幼粒细胞白血病的疗效及对血脂的影响[J].中国实用医刊,2017,44(19):41-44.[15]Huynh TT,Sultan M,Vidovic D,et al.Retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide induce lasting differentiation and demethylation of target genes in APL cells[J].Sci Rep,2019,9(1):9414.[16]苏伊拉,吕爱娥,骈晓琴,等.三氧化二砷联合全反式维甲酸治疗急性早幼粒细胞白血病的疗效及对生活质量的影响[J].癌症进展,2018,16(8):998-1000.[17]Strocchio L,Gurnari C,Santoro N,et al.Arsenic trioxide andall-trans retinoic acid treatment for childhood acute promyelocytic leukaemia[J].Br J Haematol,2019,185(2):360-363.[18]李连文,刘北忠,陈建斌,等.急性早幼粒细胞白血病诱导治疗阶段不同辅助治疗方案的疗效比较[J].广西医学,2018,40(10):1121-1124,1144.[19]Mantha S,Goldman DA,Devlin SM,et al.Determinants of fatal bleeding during induction therapy for acute promyelocytic leukemia in the ATRA era[J].Blood,2017,129(13):1763-1767.[20]王怀宇,张欣欣,张慧云,等.急性早幼粒细胞白血病患者外周血白细胞计数与早期死亡率关系[J].中国实验血液学杂志,2017,25(3):718-722.[21]李彦毕,张艺.砷剂联合全反式维甲酸治疗 M3型小儿急性早幼粒细胞白血病[J].现代肿瘤医学,2016,24(14):2296-2299.

相似文献/References:

[1]岳永威,孔令军.儿童急性早幼粒细胞白血病的免疫表型特点分析[J].医学信息,2021,34(23):36.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.23.010]
 YUE Yong-wei,KONG Ling-jun.Analysis of Immunophenotypic Characteristics of Children with Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia[J].Medical Information,2021,34(10):36.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.23.010]
[2]刘 冯,秦小虎,肖丁华.全反式维甲酸联合亚砷酸治疗初诊急性早幼粒细胞白血病的临床效果[J].医学信息,2020,33(12):67.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.12.020]
 LIU Feng,QIN Xiao-hu,XIAO Ding-hua.Clinical Effect of All-trans Retinoic Acid Combined with Arsenious Acid on Newly Diagnosed Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia[J].Medical Information,2020,33(10):67.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.12.020]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01