[1]苗 琦,肖晓芳.阴道超声联合血清β-HCG检测对稽留流产患者子宫动脉血流动力学变化及预后的预测分析[J].医学信息,2022,35(22):151-153.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.22.037]
 MIAO Qi,XIAO Xiao-fang.Prediction of Uterine Artery Hemodynamic Changes and Prognosis in Patients with Missed Abortion by Transvaginal Ultrasound Combined with Serum β-HCG[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(22):151-153.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.22.037]
点击复制

阴道超声联合血清β-HCG检测对稽留流产患者子宫动脉血流动力学变化及预后的预测分析()
分享到:

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2022年22期
页码:
151-153
栏目:
诊疗技术
出版日期:
2022-11-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Prediction of Uterine Artery Hemodynamic Changes and Prognosis in Patients with Missed Abortion by Transvaginal Ultrasound Combined with Serum β-HCG
文章编号:
1006-1959(2022)22-0151-03
作者:
苗 琦肖晓芳
(1.赣州市章贡区妇幼保健院影像科,江西 赣州 3410002.赣州市妇幼保健院超声科,江西 赣州 341000)
Author(s):
MIAO QiXIAO Xiao-fang
(1.Department of Imaging,Zhanggong District Maternal and Child Health Hospital,Ganzhou 341000,Jiangxi,China;2.Department of Ultrasound,Ganzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital,Ganzhou 341000,Jiangxi,China)
关键词:
稽留流产阴道超声血清β-HCG检测血流动力学指标
Keywords:
Missed abortionVaginal ultrasoundSerum β-HCG detectionHemodynamic index
分类号:
R714.2
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.22.037
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨阴道超声联合血清β-HCG检测对稽留流产患者子宫动脉血流动力学变化及预后的预测价值。方法 选取2017年1月-2021年10月我院妇科收治的稽留流产患者60例为试验组,另选取同期正常早孕者60例为对照组。两组均采用阴道超声检查,并进行血清β-HCG检测。比较两组孕妇妊娠周期<10周及10~12周子宫动脉血流动力学指标[收缩期峰值流速与舒张末期流速比值(S/D)、阻力指数(RI)、搏动指数(PI)]、血清β-HCG水平以及不同检测方式的阳性检出率。结果 0 h时,两组β-HCG水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);48 h时,试验组β-HCG水平低于对照组(P<0.05);且试验组48 h增长率小于对照组(P<0.05);妊娠<10周时,两组S/D值比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),试验组PI、RI值低于对照组(P<0.05);妊娠10~12周时,两组S/D、PI值比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),试验组RI值低于对照组(P<0.05);β-HCG检测阳性检出率为86.67%;阴道超声检查阳性检出率为93.33%;两种方法联合检测阳性检出率为100.00%。结论 阴道超声联合血清β-HCG检测准确率高于单独检测,β-HCG水平越低子宫动脉血流动力学参数越高,提示稽留流产发生率越高,对血清β-HCG水平和子宫动脉血流动力学参数变化进行密切监测有利于稽留流产的诊断与预防。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the predictive value of transvaginal ultrasound combined with serum β-HCG detection for uterine artery hemodynamic changes and prognosis in patients with missed abortion.Methods From January 2017 to October 2021,60 patients with missed abortion admitted to our hospital were selected as the experimental group, and 60 patients with normal early pregnancy were selected as the control group. Both groups were examined by vaginal ultrasound and serum β-HCG was detected. The hemodynamic indexes of uterine artery [ratio of systolic peak velocity to end-diastolic velocity (S/D), resistance index (RI), pulsatility index (PI)] of pregnant women with pregnancy cycle < 10 weeks and 10-12 weeks, serum β-HCG level and positive detection rate of different detection methods were compared between the two groups.Results At 0 h, there was no significant difference in β-HCG level between the two groups (P>0.05); at 48 h, the level of β-HCG in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05), and the 48 h growth rate of the experimental group was lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). At< 10 weeks of pregnancy, there was no significant difference in S/D value between the two groups (P>0.05); the PI and RI values of the experimental group were lower than those of the control group (P<0.05). At 10-12 weeks of pregnancy, there was no significant difference in S/D and PI values between the two groups (P>0.05), but the RI value of the experimental group was lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). The positive detection rate of β-HCG was 86.67%. The positive detection rate of transvaginal ultrasound was 93.33%. The positive rate of combined detection of the two methods was 100.00%.Conclusion The accuracy of vaginal ultrasound combined with serum β-HCG detection is higher than that of single detection. The lower the level of β-HCG is, the higher the hemodynamic parameters of uterine artery are, suggesting that the incidence of missed abortion is higher. Close monitoring of serum β-HCG level and changes in hemodynamic parameters of uterine artery is conducive to the diagnosis and prevention of missed abortion.

参考文献/References:

[1]Wu HL,Marwah S,Wang P,et al.Misoprostol for medical treatment of missed abortion: a systematic review and network meta-analysis[J].Sci Rep,2017,7(1):1664.[2]Xia S,Zhen Y,Ma H,et al.Abnormal expression of microRNA-575 leads to missed abortion through regulating apoptosis and angiogenesis[J].Exp Ther Med,2017,14(5):3993-4000.[3]赖翠英.稽留流产患者的病因分析及防治对策研究[J].山西医药杂志,2021,50(14):2192-2195.[4]张娅娣,胡淑娟.子宫动脉血流动力学参数的变化与稽留流产的关系[J].中国卫生标准管理,2021,12(8):64-66.[5]陈丽艳,陈志伟,张云.血清β-HCG孕酮CA125联合彩色多普勒超声对异位妊娠早期诊断的临床价值[J].基层医学论坛,2019,23(19):2760-2761.[6]李秀娟.血清β-HCG、孕酮、CK-MB比率、CA125联合阴道超声在早期异位妊娠诊断中的价值[J].中国实验诊断学,2017,21(12):2075-2078.[7]Burton GJ,Woods AW,Jauniaux E,et al.Rheological and physiological consequences of conversion of the maternal spiral arteries for uteroplacental blood flow during human pregnancy[J].Placenta,2009,30(6):473-482.[8]李雪梅,易蕾,陆鸣鸣.复发性流产与子宫动脉血流动力学的关系研究[J].右江民族医学院学报,2017,39(6):481-484.[9]杨燕,卢伟,刘明娟,等.血清缺氧诱导因子-α水平与妊娠期高血压疾病子宫动脉血流动力学参数的关系[J].中国医药导报,2019,16(15):77-80.[10]郝亚楠,张艺玮,潘晓伟,等.稽留流产彩色多普勒超声影像分析[J].河北医药,2018,40(10):1546-1548.[11]胡明子,王琴晓,王佳佳,等.稽留流产超声子宫动脉血流动力学特征及其预测价值[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2020,28(5):775-777,781.[12]倪梁红,童陶然,胡海燕,等.阴道超声联合血清β-hGG、P检测诊断未破裂异位妊娠效能[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2021,29(3):524-527,532,635.[13]王嘉宁,陈珊珊,庄燕燕,等.CLEC14A、VEGF在胚胎停育患者蜕膜组织中的表达及其与超声血流参数的相关性研究[J].现代妇产科进展,2019,28(6):401-406.[14]张利霞,孙怀玉.卵巢早衰患者激素水平与子宫动脉血流参数的相关性研究[J].中国妇幼保健,2015,30(31):5340-5342.[15]胡庆兰,杨金燕,程苛,等.阴道超声联合血清β-HCG水平检测诊断宫外孕的价值研究[J].河北医药,2020,42(4):591-593,597.[16]徐进,沈杨.联合检测血清血管内皮生长因子和β-HCG对早期异位妊娠的诊断意义[J].临床输血与检验,2017,19(4):375-379.[17]张雪洛,陈艳花,武学清.种植窗期子宫内膜微血管密度与胚胎种植结局的相关性探讨[J].临床医药实践,2017,26(3):166-169.[18]强嘉璘.超声检测复发性流产患者子宫动脉血流频谱波形特征和血流动力学参数的临床价值[J].中国妇幼保健,2021,36(8):1823-1825.[19]王芬香,卢艳明.经阴道彩色多普勒超声检查对胚胎停育的预测价值研究[J].重庆医学,2017,46(27):3853-3855.[20]白璐,吴利英,杨红,等.早期先兆流产患者不同孕龄血清雌二醇水平波动对妊娠结局的影响[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2021,20(2):194-196.

相似文献/References:

[1]孙 阳.经腹超声和经阴道超声对剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠的诊断价值比较[J].医学信息,2021,34(19):175.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.19.048]
 SUN Yang.Comparison of Diagnostic Value of Transabdominal Ultrasound andTransvaginal Ultrasound in Cesarean Scar Pregnancy[J].Journal of Medical Information,2021,34(22):175.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.19.048]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01