[1]刘慢慢,王 隽.超声骨刀在下颌复杂阻生牙拔除中的应用效果及对预后的影响[J].医学信息,2023,36(24):87-90.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.24.018]
　LIU Man-man,WANG Jun.Application Effect of Ultrasonic Osteotome in the Extraction of Complex Impacted Mandibular Teeth and its Influence on Prognosis[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(24):87-90.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.24.018]
点击复制

超声骨刀在下颌复杂阻生牙拔除中的应用效果及对预后的影响()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
36卷
期数:
2023年24期
页码:
87-90
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2023-12-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application Effect of Ultrasonic Osteotome in the Extraction of Complex Impacted Mandibular Teeth and its Influence on Prognosis
文章编号:
1006-1959（2023）24-0087-04
作者:
刘慢慢; 王 隽
（北京华信医院口腔科，北京 100015）
Author(s):
LIU Man-man; WANG Jun
(Department of Stomatology,Beijing Huaxin Hospital,Beijing 100015,China)
关键词:
下颌复杂阻生牙; 超声骨刀; 涡轮手机; 炎症反应
Keywords:
Complex impacted mandibular teeth; Ultrasonic osteotome; High-speed dental instruments; Inflammatory reaction
分类号:
R782.11
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.24.018
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 研究超声骨刀在下颌复杂阻生牙拔除中的应用效果及对预后的影响。方法 以2022年1月-12月北京华信医院口腔科收治的下颌复杂阻生牙患者为研究对象，按照随机数字表法分为对照组和试验组，各25例。对照组采用高速涡轮手机拔牙，试验组采用超声骨刀拔牙，比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、颊周径增长量、术后疼痛程度、术后张口受限程度、炎症介质水平[白细胞（WBC）]及术后不良反应。结果 试验组手术时间长于对照组，但术中出血量、颊周径增长量少于对照组（P＜0.05）；试验组疼痛程度低于对照组（P＜0.05）；两组术后张口受限程度比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；两组术后第3天WBC水平高于术前，但试验组低于对照组（P＜0.05）；两组术后1周不良反应发生率比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论 超声骨刀在下颌复杂阻生牙拔除中具有确切作用，其手术时间稍长，但术中出血量少，可减轻拔牙引起的面颊肿胀、术后疼痛情况，并减轻术后炎症反应，对预后康复具有积极作用。
Abstract:
Objective To study the effect of ultrasonic osteotome in the extraction of complex impacted mandibular teeth and its influence on prognosis.Methods Patients with complex impacted mandibular teeth admitted to the Department of Stomatology, Beijing Huaxin Hospital from January to December 2022 were selected as the research objects. According to the random number table method, they were divided into control group and experimental group, with 25 patients in each group. The control group was treated with high-speed dental instruments tooth extraction, and the experimental group was treated with ultrasonic osteotome tooth extraction. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, buccal circumference growth, postoperative pain, postoperative mouth opening limitation, inflammatory mediator level [white blood cell (WBC)] and postoperative adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.Results The operation time of the experimental group was longer than that of the control group, but the intraoperative blood loss and the increase of cheek circumference were less than those of the control group (P<0.05). The degree of pain in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the degree of limitation of mouth opening between the two groups (P>0.05). The WBC level of the two groups on the third day after operation was higher than that before operation, but that of the experimental group was lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of one-week postoperative adverse reactions between the two groups (P>0.05).Conclusion Ultrasonic osteotome has a definite effect in the extraction of complex impacted mandibular teeth. Its operation time is slightly longer, but the intraoperative blood loss is less. Meanwhile, it can reduce the cheek swelling and postoperative pain caused by tooth extraction, and reduce the postoperative inflammatory response, with a positive effect on prognosis and rehabilitation.

参考文献/References:

[1]徐光宙,杨驰,范新东,等.以下颌神经管为参照的下颌阻生第三磨牙的分类及临床意义[J].中国口腔颌面外科杂志,2014,12(2):131-135.[2]蔡萍,丁修明,张祥.超声骨刀对下颌阻生齿拔除患者疗效、疼痛标志物、炎症反应及下牙槽神经损伤的影响[J].转化医学杂志,2022,11(4):226-229.[3]张新华,柳新华.两种手术方法在下颌低位水平阻生第三磨牙拔除术中的对比研究[J].中国药物与临床,2021,21(24):4050-4052.[4]董方,何升腾,童远武,等.超声骨刀在下颌复杂阻生智齿拔除中的应用及对疼痛介质水平的影响[J].中国医学装备,2021,18(5):39-43.[5]余佳杰,马宏涛,朱亚琴.两种微创法拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙的临床效果比较研究[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2020,13(11):660-664.[6]向国林,李林林,魏钰璋,等.超声骨刀联合45°反角涡轮钻拔除下颌阻生智齿的临床应用[J].口腔医学研究,2020,36(7):674-677.[7]肖佳灵,徐国超.超声骨刀与高速涡轮钻拔除下颌中低位水平阻生智齿的比较[J].实用医学杂志,2020,36(11):1483-1487.[8]关则任,李淑婷,梁国健,等.无痛口腔麻醉仪联合超声骨刀在第三磨牙牙胚拔除术中的临床应用[J].广东医学,2020,41(10):1079-1081.[9]苏伟喆,范亚伟.超声骨刀联合涡轮钻拔除下颌复杂阻生第三磨牙的早期效果评价[J].山西医药杂志,2020,49(1):10-12.[10]巨佳,张林林,成黎霏,等.超声骨刀机用于口腔骨组织及牙齿切割手术的安全性及有效性临床研究[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2019,35(6):861-866.[11]宋勇,李想,蔡嫚,等.超声骨刀与涡轮法拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙的效果比较[J].中国口腔颌面外科杂志,2019,17(6):540-544.[12]郭涛,张鹏飞,许音,等.Er:YAG激光与超声骨刀在拔除下颌低位垂直阻生齿中的临床疗效比较[J].河北医科大学学报,2022,43(9):1073-1078.[13]贺平,冯瑜,吴晓乐,等.超声骨刀拔除下颌第三磨牙断根效果评价[J].口腔医学研究,2019,35(4):368-371.[14]周杨一帆,张雪明,侯光宇,等.超声骨刀颊侧开窗法拔除下颌低位骨埋伏第三磨牙[J].口腔颌面外科杂志,2019,29(1):30-33.[15]Connor MG,Colton B,Neetin P,et al.Piezosurgery versus Conventional Cutting Techniques in Craniofacial Surgery:A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J].Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery,2022,149(1):183-195.[16]刘朝阳,唐璟,唐祎,等.超声骨刀联合45°反角涡轮钻拔除下颌复杂阻生智齿的临床疗效观察[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2018,34(8):495-498.[17]朱凌,薛浩伟,赵丽,等.四种方法拔除下颌低位阻生智齿的效果观察[J].中国中西医结合耳鼻咽喉科杂志,2018,26(4):287-289.[18]Scolozzi P.Buccal corticotomy using piezosurgery as a surgical approach for removal of deeply impacted mandibular teeth: An alternative procedure to avoid pitfalls associated with the conventional technique[J].Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,2021,123(2):142-146.[19]高永波,蒋瑷,李伯友,等.超声骨刀与凿骨劈冠法拔除下颌阻生智齿的比较[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2011,29(4):372-374.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01