[1]刘 颖.血清淀粉酶、脂肪酶及C反应蛋白联合检验在急性胰腺炎诊断中的应用价值[J].医学信息,2024,37(03):141-144.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.03.029]
　LIU Ying.Application Value of Combined Detection of Serum Amylase, Lipase and C-reactive Protein in the Diagnosis of Acute Pancreatitis[J].Journal of Medical Information,2024,37(03):141-144.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.03.029]
点击复制

血清淀粉酶、脂肪酶及C反应蛋白联合检验在急性胰腺炎诊断中的应用价值()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
37卷
期数:
2024年03期
页码:
141-144
栏目:
诊疗技术
出版日期:
2024-02-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application Value of Combined Detection of Serum Amylase, Lipase and C-reactive Protein in the Diagnosis of Acute Pancreatitis
文章编号:
1006-1959（2024）03-0141-04
作者:
刘 颖
（天津市滨海新区海滨人民医院医学检验科，天津 300280）
Author(s):
LIU Ying
(Department of Medical Laboratory,Tianjin Binhai New District Haibin People’s Hospital,Tianjin 300280,China)
关键词:
血清淀粉酶; 脂肪酶; C反应蛋白; 急性胰腺炎
Keywords:
Serum amylase; Lipase; C-reactive protein; Acute pancreatitis
分类号:
R576；R446.1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.03.029
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 研究血清淀粉酶、脂肪酶及C反应蛋白联合检验在急性胰腺炎诊断中的应用价值。方法 选取2022年1月-12月我院诊治的54例急性胰腺炎患者作为观察组，并选取同期在我院体检健康者54例作为对照组，两组均进行血清淀粉酶、脂肪酶及C反应蛋白检验，比较对照组与观察组、不同病情急性胰腺炎患者血清淀粉酶、脂肪酶及C反应蛋白水平，并分析不同检验指标的诊断效能（灵敏度、特异度、准确率、阳性预测值、阴性预测值）。结果 观察组血清淀粉酶、脂肪酶及C反应蛋白水平均高于对照组（P＜0.05）；重度急性胰腺炎患者血清淀粉酶、脂肪酶及C反应蛋白水平均高于轻度急性胰腺炎患者（P＜0.05）；血清淀粉酶+脂肪酶+C反应蛋白检测诊断灵敏度、特异度、准确率、阳性预测值、阴性预测值均高于各指标单一检测，C反应蛋白检测诊断灵敏度、特异度、准确率、阳性预测值、阴性预测值均高于血清淀粉酶、脂肪酶检测（P＜0.05）；而血清淀粉酶检测诊断灵敏度、特异度、准确率、阳性预测值、阴性预测值与脂肪酶检测比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论 血清淀粉酶、脂肪酶及C反应蛋白联合检验在急性胰腺炎诊断中具有较高的诊断价值，且急性胰腺炎病情与血清淀粉酶、脂肪酶及C反应蛋白水平密切相关，值得临床予以重视。
Abstract:
Objective To study the application value of combined detection of serum amylase, lipase and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis.Methods A total of 54 patients with acute pancreatitis diagnosed and treated in our hospital from January to December 2022 were selected as the observation group, and 54 healthy people who underwent physical examination in our hospital during the same period were selected as the control group. Serum amylase, lipase and C-reactive protein tests were performed in both groups. Serum amylase, lipase and C-reactive protein levels were compared between the control group and the observation group, and patients with acute pancreatitis of different conditions. The diagnostic efficacy (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value) of different test indicators was analyzed.Results The levels of serum amylase, lipase and C-reactive protein in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). The levels of serum amylase, lipase and C-reactive protein in patients with severe acute pancreatitis were higher than those in patients with mild acute pancreatitis (P<0.05). The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of serum amylase+lipase+C-reactive protein detection were higher than those of single detection of each index, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of C-reactive protein detection were higher than those of serum amylase and lipase detection (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value between serum amylase detection and lipase detection (P>0.05).Conclusion The combined test of serum amylase, lipase and C-reactive protein has high diagnostic value in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis, and the condition of acute pancreatitis is closely related to the levels of serum amylase, lipase and C-reactive protein, which is worthy of clinical attention.

参考文献/References:

[1]付冰,陈丽,付丹.血清sFlt-1、LDH及hs-CRP联合检测对重型急性胰腺炎的早期诊断价值[J].标记免疫分析与临床,2019,26(2):277-280.[2]李朝辉,胡雅,叶健翔,等.血清淀粉样蛋白A和超敏C反应蛋白联合检测在小儿呼吸道感染性疾病早期鉴别诊断中的临床应用价值及相关性分析[J].中国医药科学,2020,10(5):160-164.[3]余水泉,施迎春.急性胰腺炎患者PCT、ALB、AMY及CRP水平检测的临床价值[J].标记免疫分析与临床,2019,26(2):234-237.[4]笪伟.红细胞分布宽度和血清C-反应蛋白与白蛋白比值对急性胰腺炎预后的预测价值探讨[J].肝胆外科杂志,2019,27(5):365-367.[5]曹文延,杨东亮,厚胜利.PCT、IL-6、hs-CRP对急性胰腺炎的诊断价值[J].检验医学与临床,2019,16(23):3441-3443.[6]黄锐,刘念.联合PCT、钙离子、CRP及脂肪酶检测预测急性胰腺炎严重程度[J].肝胆外科杂志,2019,27(6):422-425.[7]杨珠莹,谢齐贵,陈湛蕾,等.血清CRP与PCT及脂肪酶对重症急性胰腺炎患者发生感染性胰腺坏死的预测[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2018,28(11):1693-1696.[8]罗丽娅,熊灿,陈晓琴.早期血清降钙素原和C反应蛋白检测对感染性胰腺坏死的预测价值[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2018,34(2):346-349.[9]陈莎燕,赵琳,孙兰菊,等.血清鸢尾素检测对重型急性胰腺炎诊断的价值[J].广东医学,2017,38(23):3617-3619.[10]蔺昕,吕连峥,徐卫平,等.PCT联合淀粉酶肌酐清除率检测在急性胰腺炎早期诊断和预后中的价值[J].检验医学与临床,2016,13(10):1397-1399.[11]李佳,尹庆霞.C反应蛋白、D-二聚体水平变化对高脂血症性急性胰腺炎的早期诊断价值[J].医学临床研究,2018,35(8):1530-1532.[12]张剑,魏殿军.血淀粉酶、胰脂肪酶、PCT、CRP联合检测在急性胰腺炎中的诊断价值[J].中国实验诊断学,2017,21(5):778-780.[13]高娟,刘静.急性胰腺炎早期诊断中血清脂肪酶、淀粉酶、C反应蛋白联合检验的临床价值[J].现代消化及介入诊疗,2017,22(3):325-327.[14]刘希龙,刘日旭.淀粉酶、脂肪酶和C反应蛋白联合检测在急性胰腺炎早期诊断中的价值[J].国际检验医学杂志,2017,38(21):2979-2981.[15]王耀.血清淀粉酶、脂肪酶及C反应蛋白联合检验在急性胰腺炎诊断中的应用价值分析[J].内蒙古中医药,2017,36(2):102-103.[16]陈颖.血清D-二聚体、白细胞介素-6、C-反应蛋白、降钙素原检测在急性胰腺炎诊断中的价值[J].河南医学高等专科学校学报,2023,35(3):313-315.[17]祁玮,黄飞,何健,等.血清C-反应蛋白、降钙素原及脂肪酶在急性胰腺炎诊断及病情评估中的应用价值[J].广西医学,2019,41(23):2984-2988.[18]何新珍,陈景红.淀粉酶、C反应蛋白、白细胞联合检测快速诊断急性胰腺炎及分型的临床价值[J].黑龙江医药科学,2023,46(1):67-69.[19]陶珊,沈磊,刘玮玮,等.血清白细胞介素-10水平在急性胰腺炎诊断及治疗中的应用[J].分子诊断与治疗杂志,2022,14(1):129-132.[20]丁晓琳,张伦军,高洁,等.血清脂肪酶、淀粉酶及C反应蛋白联合检测对急性胰腺炎诊断的意义[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2021,46(9):1255-1257.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘可文,周 浩.经脐单孔腹腔镜手术治疗急性胆囊炎患者的有效性及对血清淀粉酶水平的影响[J].医学信息,2020,33(24):93.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.24.025]
　LIU Ke-wen,ZHOU Hao.The Effectiveness of Transumbilical Single Port Laparoscopic Surgery in Patients with Acute Cholecystitis and Its Effect on Serum Amylase Levels[J].Journal of Medical Information,2020,33(03):93.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.24.025]
[2]万汉朝,彭华敏,曹冬枝.腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎的疗效及术后炎症因子、血清淀粉酶变化分析[J].医学信息,2023,36(24):61.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.24.011]
　WAN Han-chao,Peng Hua-min,CAO Dong-zhi.Curative Effect of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in the Treatment of Acute Calculous Cholecystitis and the Influence of Postoperative Inflammatory Factors and Serum Amylase Changes[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(03):61.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.24.011]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01