[1]夏易曼娜,李虎成.腹腔镜下宫颈癌根治术与传统开腹手术的对比研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(12):115-117.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.12.036]
　XIA Yi-manna,LI Hu-cheng.Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Cervical Cancer and Traditional Open Surgery[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(12):115-117.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.12.036]
点击复制

腹腔镜下宫颈癌根治术与传统开腹手术的对比研究()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
31卷
期数:
2018年12期
页码:
115-117
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2018-06-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Cervical Cancer and Traditional Open Surgery
文章编号:
1006-1959（2018）12-0115-03
作者:
夏易曼娜; 李虎成
湖南省肿瘤医院妇瘤科，湖南 长沙 410013
Author(s):
XIA Yi-manna; LI Hu-cheng
Department of Gynecologic Oncology,Hunan Cancer Hospital,Changsha 410013,Hunan,China
关键词:
腹腔镜; 宫颈癌; 开腹手术; 并发症
Keywords:
Key words：Laparoscopy; Cervical cancer; Open surgery; Complications
分类号:
R737.33
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.12.036
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 对比研究腹腔镜下宫颈癌根治术和传统开腹宫颈癌根治术的临床疗效、安全性、术后生活质量等。方法 选择湖南省肿瘤医院妇瘤科2014年5月~2016年12月因宫颈癌行手术的患者200例，根据手术方式分为两组，各100例。开腹组采用传统开腹手术，腹腔镜组采用腹腔镜下宫颈癌根治术治疗，对比两组患者的手术情况、并发症、术后恢复情况以及FACT-G评分。结果 腹腔镜组前50例手术时间为（280.0±32.5）min，长于开腹组的（190.0±23.2）min，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05），但腹腔镜组中按照时间顺序后50例手术时间为（200.0±22.6）min，与开腹组相比，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。腹腔镜组中出血量（125.3±48.2）ml，少于开腹组的（230.0±70.2）ml，统计学意义显著（P＜0.01）。腹腔镜组中淋巴结清扫数目多于开腹组，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。腹腔镜组术中损伤、切口愈合不良、淋巴囊肿发生率与开腹组比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。腹腔镜组尿潴留发生率为35.00%，高于开腹组的12.00%，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。腹腔镜组术后48 h疼痛评分、肛门排气时间、术后住院日及术后FACT-G评分均优于开腹组，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 腹腔镜手术治疗宫颈癌疗效确切，具有创伤小、恢复快、术后生活质量高等优点。
Abstract:
Abstract：Objective To compare the clinical efficacy, safety and postoperative quality of laparoscopic radical resection of cervical cancer and conventional radical resection of cervical cancer.Methods A total of 200 patients with cervical cancer who underwent surgery from May 2014 to December 2016 in Hunan Provincial Cancer Hospital were divided into two groups,100 in each group.The open group was treated with conventional open surgery.The laparoscopic group was treated with laparoscopic radical resection of cervical cancer.The operation,intraoperative and postoperative complications,postoperative recovery and FACT-G score were compared between the two groups.Results The operative time of the first 50 patients in the laparoscopic group was(280.0±32.5)min,which was longer than that in the open group(190.0±23.2)min,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05),However,the operative time of 50 patients in the laparoscopic group was(200.0±22.6)min,which was not statistically significant compared with the open group(P>0.05). The amount of bleeding in the laparoscopic group was(125.3±48.2) ml,which was less than that in the open group(230.0±70.2)ml, which was statistically significant(P<0.01).The number of lymph node dissection in the laparoscopic group was higher than that in the open group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in laparoscopic surgery in terms of intraoperative injury,poor incision healing,and lymphatic cyst incidence compared with the open group(P>0.05).The incidence of urinary retention in the laparoscopic group was 35.00%,which was higher than that in the open group 12.00%,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The 48 h pain score, the anus exhaust time,the postoperative hospitalization day and the postoperative FACT-G score of the laparoscopy group were all better than those in the open group,and the difference was statistically significant(P <0.05).Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery is effective in treating cervical cancer,with the advantages of less trauma,quicker recovery and higher quality of life after operation.

参考文献/References:

[1]伍娇娇,冯定庆,凌斌,等.宫颈癌预后相关分子标志物的研究进展[J].实用医学杂志,2013,29(24):3961-3963.
[2]杨丽,马彩玲,赵骏达,等.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗早期宫颈癌疗效与安全性的Meta分析[J].中国循证医学杂志,2016,16(02):200-211.
[3]Kim YB,Suh DH,Kim K,et al.Case selection is a fundamental prerequisite to the successful surmounting of learning curve of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer:a matched-case comparison in a single institution[J].J Minim Invasive Gynecol,2015,22(6S):S97.
[4]Park JY,Kim D,Suh DS,et al.The Role of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early-stage adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix[J].Ann Surg Oncol,2016,23(Suppl 5):825-833.
[5]汪军坚,王春兰,张婉平,等.腹腔镜手术治疗宫颈癌患者术后生活质量分析[J].中国内镜杂志,2016,22(06):31-34.
[6]陈春林,郭红霞,刘萍,等.根治性子宫切除术中系统保留盆腔自主神经的临床研究[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2009,25(03):206-209.
[7]胡郅珺,李培全,刘开江,等.腹腔镜下保留盆腔神经宫颈癌根治术对膀胱功能影响的研究[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2017,33(08):827-831.
[8]杨丽,洪毅,马彩玲,等.3D腹腔镜与2D腹腔镜宫颈癌根治术的比较研究[J].中国微创外科杂志,2016,16(06):506-510.

相似文献/References:

[1]廖加群,曹 雪,陈燕平,等.宫颈癌盆腔淋巴结转移分布及危险因素分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(03):25.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.03.008]
　LIAO Jia-qun,CAO Xue,CHEN Yan-ping,et al.Distribution and Risk Factors of Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis in Cervical Cancer[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(12):25.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.03.008]
[2]王 丹.腹腔镜子宫全切除术与开腹手术的临床效果分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(03):105.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.03.034]
　WANG Dan.Analysis of Clinical Effects between Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Open Hysterectomy[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(12):105.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.03.034]
[3]李华桥.腹腔镜联合胃镜行胃间质瘤切除术对胃间质瘤患者 术后康复及并发症的影响分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(05):114.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.039]
　LI Hua-qiao.Effect of Laparoscopy Combined with Gastroscopy for Gastric Stromal Tumor Resection on Postoperative Rehabilitation and Complications of Gastric Stromal Tumor Patients[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(12):114.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.039]
[4]徐 洁.宫颈癌筛查及预防的研究进展[J].医学信息,2018,31(09):70.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.09.022]
　XU Jie.Advances in Screening and Prevention of Cervical Cancer[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(12):70.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.09.022]
[5]蔡亚磊,邓思雨,杨 健.宫颈癌放疗增敏的研究现状[J].医学信息,2022,35(09):65.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.09.016]
　CAI Ya-lei,DENG Si-yu,YANG Jian.Research Status of Radiotherapy Sensitization for Cervical Cancer[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(12):65.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.09.016]
[6]车 莹.HPV感染与宫颈病变相关性的研究[J].医学信息,2022,35(09):84.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.09.021]
　CHE Ying.Study on the Correlation Between HPV Infection and Cervical Lesions[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(12):84.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.09.021]
[7]曹 亮,郝 朋,李阳明,等.宫颈癌所致输尿管梗阻患者输尿管支架置入成功率影响因素的Meta分析[J].医学信息,2022,35(09):124.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.09.031]
　CAO Liang,HAO Peng,LI Yang-ming,et al.Meta Analysis of Factors Influencing Success Rate of Ureteral Stent Implantation in Patients with Ureteral Obstruction Caused by Cervical Cancer[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(12):124.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.09.031]
[8]覃念群,刘 楷,米镜霖,等.基于生物信息学分析筛选与宫颈癌预后相关的关键基因[J].医学信息,2022,35(10):8.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.10.002]
　QIN Nian-qun,LIU Kai,MI Jing-lin,et al.Screening Key Genes Related to the Prognosis of Cervical Cancer Based on Bioinformatics Analysis[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(12):8.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.10.002]
[9]黄 花,徐冬冬,章丽霞.TGF-β1在宫颈癌中的研究进展[J].医学信息,2018,31(12):31.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.12.011]
　HUANG Hua,XU Dong-dong,ZHANG Li-xia.Research Progress of TGF-β1 in Cervical Cancer[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(12):31.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.12.011]
[10]李建勇.腹腔镜下手术治疗卵巢巧克力囊肿研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(12):57.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.12.018]
　LI Jian-yong.Laparoscopic Surgery for Ovarian Chocolate Cysts[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(12):57.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.12.018]
[11]曾育飞,郑智娉.腹腔镜保留神经平面广泛子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌的效果[J].医学信息,2020,33(20):99.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.20.029]
　ZENG Yu-fei,ZHENG Zhi-ping.Laparoscopic Nerve Plane Extensive Hysterectomy for Treatment of Cervical Cancer[J].Journal of Medical Information,2020,33(12):99.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.20.029]

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-06-15