[1]杨茜岚,占伊扬,陈丽灵,等.基于CBL教学的动态评估系统在临床医学专业“5+3”一体化创新人才培养中的应用效果[J].医学信息,2020,33(22):9-12.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.22.003]
　YANG Xi-lan,ZHAN Yi-yang,CHEN Li-ling,et al.Application Effect of Dynamic Evaluation System Based on CBL Teaching in the Training of "5+3" Integrated Innovative Talents of Clinical Medicine[J].Medical Information,2020,33(22):9-12.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.22.003]
点击复制

基于CBL教学的动态评估系统在临床医学专业“5+3”一体化创新人才培养中的应用效果()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
33卷
期数:
2020年22期
页码:
9-12
栏目:
出版日期:
2020-11-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application Effect of Dynamic Evaluation System Based on CBL Teaching in the Training of "5+3" Integrated Innovative Talents of Clinical Medicine
文章编号:
1006-1959（2020）22-0009-04
作者:
杨茜岚; 占伊扬; 陈丽灵; 等
（1.南京医科大学第二附属医院老年医学科，江苏 南京 210011；2.南京医科大学第一临床医学院，江苏 南京 210029；3.南京医科大学第一附属医院全科医学科，江苏 南京 210029）
Author(s):
YANG Xi-lan; ZHAN Yi-yang; CHEN Li-ling;  et al
(1.Department of Geriatrics,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing 210011,Jiangsu,China;2.the First Clinical School of Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing 210029,Jiangsu,China;3.Department of General Medicine,the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing 210029,Jiangsu,China)
关键词:
基于案例学习; 临床专业; 大数据; 教学方法
Keywords:
Case based learning; Clinical specialty; Big data; Teaching method
分类号:
R-4
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.22.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨基于案例学习（CBL）教学的数字化动态评估系统在临床医学专业“5+3”一体化创新人才培养中的应用效果。方法 选取2019年1~12月在南京医科大学第一临床医学院的100名“5+3”临床医学生为研究对象，随机分为实验组和对照组，每组50名。对照组采用常规CBL教学，实验组在此基础上引入动态评估体系，比较两组培训后学生课程考核、对自身学习效果和教师教学能力评估、学习积极性。结果 实验组学生平时成绩、期末成绩、总分均高于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。学习效果自评调查中实验组学生在提高学习兴趣、提高自学能力、提高解决问题能力、提高临床诊疗思维方面均优于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；学生对教师教学能力的调查中实验组在教学方法的启示性、疑难重点的敏锐度、教学活动中的重要性方面评价均优于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。实验组主动发言人数为27人，多于对照组为的16人，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 “5+3”临床医学专业CBL教学活动中，加入临床知识结构水平大数据动态评估体系，有利于教师实时调整教学方法，激发学生学习热情，提高学习效率。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the application effect of digital dynamic assessment system based on case based learning (CBL) teaching in the training of "5 + 3" integrated innovative talents in clinical medicine.Methods A total of 100 "5+3 year" clinical medical students were selected as the research subjects training in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2019 to December 2019. Randomly divided into the experimental group (n=50) and the control group (n=50). The control group used conventional CBL teaching and the experimental group introduced a dynamic evaluation system based on this. After the training, the two groups of students were assessed for curriculum assessment, questionnaire survey and learning motivation.Results The usual grades, final grades, and total scores of the experimental group students were higher than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). In the self-evaluation survey of learning effect, the experimental group of students were better than the control group in improving learning interest, self-study ability, problem-solving ability, and clinical diagnosis and treatment thinking,the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05); students’ teaching ability to teachers in the survey, the experimental group was better than the control group in terms of the enlightenment of teaching methods, the acuity of difficult key points, and the importance of teaching activities,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The number of active speakers in the experimental group was 27, more than 16 in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusions In the CBL teaching activities of "5+3" clinical medicine specialty, a big data dynamic assessment system of clinical knowledge structure level will help teachers adjust teaching methods in real time, stimulate students’ enthusiasm for learning and improve learning efficiency.

参考文献/References:

[1]翁桂丹,邱秀华,林晓珊,等.临床医学专业“5+3”一体化人才培养的实践[J].中华医学教育探索杂志,2019,18(3):277-281.[2]秦建增,黎莉,毛燕娜,等.基于大数据和形成性评价理论的课后即时评学评教系统研发与应用[J].中华医学教育探索杂志,2018,17(3):254-259.[3]Norman G.Likert scales,levels of measurement and the"laws"of statistics[J].Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract,2010,15(5):625-632.[4]Arora VM.Harnessing the Power of Big Data to Improve Graduate Medical Education:Big Idea or Bust[J].Acad Med,2018,93(6):833-834.[5]Ellaway RH,Topps D,Pusic M.Data, Big and Small:Emerging Challenges to Medical Education Scholarship[J].Acad Med,2019,94(1):31-36.[6]Kelly E,Richards JB.Medical education:giving feedback to doctors in training[J].BMJ,2019(366):14523.[7]苏菲菲,宋蕊,石苗茜,等.大数据支持的医学教育课程教学模式创新范例[J].卫生职业教育,2019,37(4):14-16.[8]杨慧,段志军,常庆勇,等.多层次学员“一体化”临床思维培训与评价[J].中华医学教育探索杂志,2019,18(3):217-222.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01