[1]王李娜,王恩群.牙源性颌骨囊肿术后自发性骨再生与Bio-Oss移植骨再生效果比较[J].医学信息,2022,35(05):91-93.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.05.022]
　WANG Li-na,WANG En-qun.Comparison of the Effect of Spontaneous Bone Regeneration and Bio-Oss Graft Bone Regeneration After Odontogenic Jaw Cyst Surgery[J].Medical Information,2022,35(05):91-93.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.05.022]
点击复制

牙源性颌骨囊肿术后自发性骨再生与Bio-Oss移植骨再生效果比较()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2022年05期
页码:
91-93
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2022-03-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of the Effect of Spontaneous Bone Regeneration and Bio-Oss Graft Bone Regeneration After Odontogenic Jaw Cyst Surgery
文章编号:
1006-1959（2022）05-0091-03
作者:
王李娜; 王恩群
（安徽医科大学附属安庆医院口腔颌面外科，安徽 安庆 246000）
Author(s):
WANG Li-na; WANG En-qun
(Department of Stomatology,Anqing Hospital,Anhui Medical University,Anqing 246000,Anhui,China)
关键词:
牙源性颌骨囊肿; 囊肿摘除; Bio-0ss骨粉; 骨再生
Keywords:
Dental jaw cyst; Cyst removal; Bio-Oss bone powder; Bone regeneration
分类号:
R782.2
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.05.022
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 比较牙源性颌骨囊肿术后自发性骨再生与骨填充材料Bio-Oss移植后骨再生的效果。方法 选取2019年10月-2021年3月安徽医科大学附属安庆医院口外病房收治的50例牙源性颌骨囊肿患者（最大直径≤20 mm），随机分为观察组和对照组，各25例。对照组囊肿摘除后以自身血凝块充填愈合，观察组术后填充Bio-Oss，比较两组伤口一般情况，囊肿摘除后1、3、6个月的骨再生率、骨愈合情况及颌骨外形恢复情况。结果 两组术后伤口感染、伤口裂开、下唇麻木发生率比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；术后1、3、6个月，观察组骨缺损体积小于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；观察组骨再生率高于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；观察组骨CT值大于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；观察组骨愈合指数高于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。术后6个月，观察组外形恢复较好，对照组5例外形恢复欠佳，出现软组织塌陷。结论 对于直径≤20 mm的牙源性颌骨囊肿，术后使用Bio-Oss骨粉移植后的骨再生效果优于自身血凝块充填的自发性骨再生。
Abstract:
Objective To compare the effect of spontaneous bone regeneration after odontogenic jaw cyst and bone filling material Bio-Oss transplantation.Methods A total of 50 patients with odontogenic jaw cysts (maximum diameter≤20 mm) admitted to the Department of Otolaryngology, Anqing Hospital, Anhui Medical University from October 2019 to March 2021 were selected and randomly divided into the observation group and the control group, with 25 cases in each group. The cysts in the control group were healed with their own blood clots after removal, and the observation group was filled with Bio-Oss after operation. The general wound conditions, bone regeneration rate, bone healing and jaw shape recovery after 1, 3 and 6 months of cyst removal were compared between the two groups.Results There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative wound infection, wound dehiscence and lower lip numbness between the two groups (P>0.05). At 1,3 and 6 months after operation, the bone defect volume in the observation group was smaller than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).The bone regeneration rate in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). At 1,3 and 6 months after operation, the bone CT value of the observation group was higher than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05);the bone healing index of the observation group was higher than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05);the appearance of the observation group was better, and 5 cases in the control group had poor shape recovery and soft tissue collapse.Conclusion For odontogenic jaw cysts with diameter≤20 mm, the effect of bone regeneration after Bio-Oss bone powder transplantation is better than that of spontaneous bone regeneration after autologous blood clot filling.

参考文献/References:

[1]KilincA,GundogduB,SaruhanN,et al.Odontogenic and nonodontogenic cysts: An analysis of 526 cases in Turkey[J].Niger J Clin Pract,2017,20(7):879-883.[2]Sculean A,Stavropoulos A,Bosshardt DD.Self-regenerative capacity of intra-oral bone defects[J].J Clin Periodontol,2019(21):70-81.[3]Wakolbinger R,Beck-Mannagetta J.Long-term results after treatment of extensive odontogenic cysts of the jaws: a review[J].Clin Oral Investig,2016,20(1):15-22.[4]Khan F,Tanaka M.Designing Smart Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering[J].Int J Mol Sci,2017,19(1):17.[5]李晓.下颌骨囊肿刮除术后骨组织修复的CBCT研究[D].青岛:青岛大学,2018.[6]余伟,向乐.自体碎骨联合Bio-Oss骨粉应用于颌骨囊肿术后骨缺损中的临床效果[J].中国医药导报,2017,14(30):129-131.[7]王砚寒,郭骏,费伟.医用生物蛋白胶和碘仿纱条在颌骨囊肿刮除术中的疗效对比[J].实用医院临床杂志,2019,16(3):112-114.[8]Yamada M,Egusa H.Current bone substitutes for implant dentistry[J].J Prosthodont Res,2018,62(2):152-161. [9]Kashirina A,Yao Y,Liu Y,et al.Biopolymers as bone substitutes: a review[J].Biomater Sci,2019,7(10):3961-3983. [10]Haugen HJ,Lyngstadaas SP,Rossi F,et al.Bone grafts: which is the ideal biomaterial?[J].J Clin Periodontol,2019(21):92-102.[11]Assenmacher AT,Pareek A,Reardon PJ,et al.Long-term Outcomes After Osteochondral Allograft: A Systematic Review at Long-term Follow-up of 12.3 Years[J].Arthroscopy,2016,32(10):2160-2168. [12]Baldwin P,Li DJ,Auston DA,et al.Autograft,Allograft,and Bone Graft Substitutes: Clinical Evidence and Indications for Use in the Setting of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery[J].J Orthop Trauma,2019,33(4):203-213. [13]Suwanwela J,Puangchaipruk D,Wattanasirmkit K,et al.Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation Using Xenograft: Gene Expression and Histologic Analysis[J].Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,2017,32(3):611-616.[14]冯馨仪.骨优导(rhBMP-2)联合Bio-Oss骨粉修复犬牙周骨缺损的实验研究[D].贵州:遵义医学院,2016.[15]李伯友,苏铭扬,李阳,等.CGF联合骨代用品及口腔修复膜在颌骨囊肿手术中的应用[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2016,32(8):476-478.

相似文献/References:

[1]朱玉梅,钟玉琳,刘伶英,等.基于根管治疗联合开窗引流术在牙源性颌骨囊肿患者中的临床应用效果[J].医学信息,2024,37(20):139.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.20.029]
　ZHU Yumei,ZHONG Yulin,LIU Lingying,et al.Clinical Application Effect of Root Canal Therapy Combined with Fenestration Drainage in Patients with Odontogenic Jaw Cyst[J].Medical Information,2024,37(05):139.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.20.029]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01