[1]张小云,刘 本,连建春,等.质谱鉴定联合直接快速药敏试验在细菌血流感染中的应用[J].医学信息,2023,36(03):98-103.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.03.020]
　ZHANG Xiao-yun,LIU Ben,LIAN Jian-chun,et al.Application of Mass Spectrometry Combined with Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing in Blood Stream Infection[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(03):98-103.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.03.020]
点击复制

质谱鉴定联合直接快速药敏试验在细菌血流感染中的应用()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
36卷
期数:
2023年03期
页码:
98-103
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2023-02-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application of Mass Spectrometry Combined with Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing in Blood Stream Infection
文章编号:
1006-1959（2023）03-0098-06
作者:
张小云; 刘 本; 连建春; 等
（南京医科大学附属淮安一院检验科，江苏 淮安 223300）
Author(s):
ZHANG Xiao-yun; LIU Ben; LIAN Jian-chun; et al.
(Department of Clinical Laboratory,the Affiliated Huai’an No.1 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Huai’an 223300,Jiangsu,China)
关键词:
血流感染; 革兰阴性杆菌; 质谱快速鉴定; 直接快速药敏试验; 基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱
Keywords:
Blood stream infection; Gram-negative bacteria; Rapid identification; Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry
分类号:
R446.5
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.03.020
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 评估质谱快速鉴定联合直接药敏试验在革兰阴性细菌血流感染诊断中的临床应用价值。方法 对2021年8月-2022年3月我院133瓶血培养阳性标本经SDS沉淀离心富集细菌后，使用基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱（MALDI-TOF MS）直接鉴定，对阳性血培养液进行直接快速药敏试验（RAST），同时对培养后的菌落进行质谱鉴定和VITEK 2 Compact 药敏分析，比较两种方法的一致性。结果 133例血培养阳性标本经鉴定后革兰阴性细菌共122株，直接细菌鉴定的准确率为91.73%，包括大肠埃希菌56株、肺炎克雷伯菌26株、鲍曼不动杆菌12株和铜绿假单胞菌12株，其中鲍曼不动杆菌检出率最高为100.00%，阴沟肠杆菌最低为66.67%；所有药物结果符合（CA）比例在4、6、8 h呈现逐渐升高现象；在8 h时除了哌拉西林/他唑巴坦（TZP）和美罗培南（MEN），其他药物的CA均高于可接受值（CA＞90%），仅有1例铜绿假单胞菌对TZP的药敏结果在6、8 h时为非常重大错误（VME），1例大肠埃希菌对TZP、阿米卡星（AK）在4、6、8 h时均为重大错误（ME），2例肺炎克雷伯菌对TZP、头孢他啶（CAZ）在4、6、8 h时为ME，1例铜绿假单胞菌对妥布霉素（TOB）和庆大霉素（CN）在6、8 h时为微小错误（mE）。结论 5% SDS沉淀法联合MALDI-TOF MS直接鉴定细菌菌种准确性高，RAST的CA比例高，8 h可作为革兰阴性细菌RAST药敏判读的最佳时间点，对于及时指导临床用药及改善患者预后具有重要意义。
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the clinical application value of mass spectrometry rapid identification combined with rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing in the diagnosis of gram-negative bacterial blood stream infection.Methods From August 2021 to March 2022, 133 blood culture positive specimens in our hospital were enriched by SDS precipitation centrifugation, and the bacteria were directly identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) was performed on the positive blood culture medium, and the cultured colonies were identified by mass spectrometry and VITEK 2 Compact drug sensitivity analysis. The consistency of the two methods was compared.Results There were 122 strains of gram-negative bacteria in 133 blood culture positive samples after direct identification, the accuracy was 91.73%. Among them, there were 56 strains of Escherichia coli, 26 strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae, 12 strains of Acinetobacter baumannii and 12 strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The highest detection rate of Acinetobacter baumannii was 100.00%, and the lowest detection rate of Enterobacter cloacae was 66.67%. The proportion of CA in all drugs increased gradually at 4, 6 and 8 h time points. At the 8 h time point, except for piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP) and meropenem (MEM), CA results were above the acceptable value (categorial agreement, CA>90%). Only 1 case of TZP in Pseudomonas aeruginosa showed very major error (VME) at 6 and 8 h; 1 case of TZP and amikacin (AK) in Escherichia coli showed major error (ME) at 4, 6 and 8 h; 2 cases of TZP and ceftazidime (CAZ) of in Klebsiella pneumoniae showed ME at 4, 6 h and 8 h; 1 case of tobramycin (TOB) and gentamicin (CN) in Pseudomonas aeruginosa showed minor error (mE) at 6 and 8 h.Conclusion The accuracy of 5% SDS precipitation combined with MALDI-TOF MS for the direct identification of pathogenic bacteria is high, RAST has a high CA ratio, 8 h can be used as the optimal time point for RAST susceptibility of gram-negative bacteria，which is of great significance to timely guide clinical medication and improve the prognosis of patients.

参考文献/References:

[1]Evans L,Rhodes A,Alhazzani W,et al.Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021[J].Crit Care Med,2021,49(11):e1063-e1143.[2]Niederman MS,Baron RM,Bouadma L,et al.Initial antimicrobial management of sepsis[J].Crit Care,2021,25(1):307. [3]王大胜,王大新,耿平.成人血流感染金黄色葡萄球菌的临床分布及耐药性分析[J].实用临床医药杂志,2018,22(1):1-3.[4]Fabre V,Carroll KC,Cosgrove SE.Blood Culture Utilization in the Hospital Setting: a Call for Diagnostic Stewardship[J].J Clin Microbiol,2022,60(3):e0100521.[5]Qazi S,Heath P,Balasegaram M,et al.Can the history of empiric antibiotic treatment for neonatal sepsis inform future global trials?[J].Clin Microbiol Infect,2022,16(22):00319-00326. [6]Faron ML,Buchan BW,Ledeboer NA.Matrix-assisted laser desorptionionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry for use with positive blood cultures: Methodology,performance,and optimization[J].J Clin Microbiol,2017,55(12):3328-3338．[7]Berinson B,Olearo F,Both A,et al.EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST):analytical performance and impact on patient management[J].J Antimicrob Chemother,2021,76(5):1332-1338.[8]Taysi MR,Sentürk G?覶,?覶aliｓkan E,et al.Implementation of the EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility test (RAST) directly from positive blood culture bottles without the advanced identification systems[J].J Antimicrob Chemother,2022, 77(4):1020-1026.[9]冯琳涵,程强,刘丁华,等.基质辅助激光解析电离飞行时间质谱技术在病原菌鉴定中的应用[J].实用临床医药杂志,2021,25(14):1-3.[10]Bellanger AP,Gbaguidi-Haore H,Liapis E,et al.Rapid identification of Candida sp by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry subsequent to short term incubation on a solid medium[J].APMIS,2019,127(4):217-221．[11]Mciver CJ,Noel E,Chinmoy M,et al.A simplified and rapid method for the direct identification of microorganisms in positive BacT/ALERT blood culture bottles using MALDI-TOF MS[J].Pathology,2018,50(6):676-679．[12]王林,王媚,王维.MALDI-TOF-MS在儿童血流及尿路感染病原菌直接鉴定中的应用[J].山西医科大学学报,2021,52(1):6.[13]王岩,曹敬荣,常玥,等.分离胶法与十二烷基硫酸钠法在血培养阳性瓶基质辅助激光解析电离飞行时间质谱病原菌直接鉴定中的应用[J].中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版),2018,12(4):324-329.[14]Van den Bijllaardt W,Buiting A,Mouton JW,et al.Shortening the incubation time for antimicrobial susceptibility testing by disk diffusion for Enterobacteriaceae: how short can it be and are the results accurate?[J].Int J Antimicrob Agents,2017,49:631-637.[15]Sakarikou C,Altieri A,Bossa MC,et al.Rapid and cost-effective identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing in patients with Gram-negative bacteremia directly from blood-culture fluid[J].J Microbiol Methods,2018,146:7-12.[16]Weme ET.Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing of positive blood cultures by direct inoculation and reading of disc diffusion tests after 3-4 hours[J].APMIS,2018,126(11):870-876.[17]Faria-Ramos I,Espinar MJ,Rocha R,et al.A novel flow cytometric assay for rapid detection of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases[J].Clin Microbiol Infect,2013,19(1):E8-E15. [18]陆燕飞,刘根焰,张晓慧,等.质谱快速鉴定联合直接药敏试验在肠杆菌目细菌血流感染诊断中的应用评估[J].临床检验杂志,2021,39(11):822-827.[19]?魡kerlund A,Jonasson E,Matuschek E,et al.EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) in blood cultures: validation in 55 European laboratories[J].J Antimicrob Chemother,2020,75(11):3230-3238.[20]Soo YT,Waled SNMB,Ng S,et al.Evaluation of EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) directly from blood culture bottles[J].Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis,2020,39(5):993-998. [21]Martins A,Wink P,Pereira D,et al.Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterobacteriaceae by disk diffusion directly from blood culture bottles using the EUCAST RAST breakpoints[J].J Glob Antimicrob Resist,2020,22:637-642.

相似文献/References:

[1]张 美,王 欢,冯利芬.南京市江宁医院2015年~2017年血培养阳性病原菌分布及耐药性分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(20):108.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.20.032]
　ZHANG Mei,WANG Huan,FENG Li-fen.Analysis of Distribution and Drug Resistance of Blood Culture Positive Pathogens in Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing from 2015 to 2017[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(03):108.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.20.032]
[2]陈 琳.某院血流感染病原菌分布及耐药性分析[J].医学信息,2020,33(10):150.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.10.044]
　CHEN Lin.Analysis of Distribution and Drug Resistance of Pathogens of Bloodstream Infection in a Hospital[J].Journal of Medical Information,2020,33(03):150.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.10.044]
[3]李 冲,赵 云,王 昊,等.ICU鲍曼不动杆菌血流感染临床特征及预后危险因素分析[J].医学信息,2020,33(13):54.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.13.015]
　LI Chong,ZHAO Yun,WANG Hao,et al.Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Risk Factors of Bloodstream Infection of Acinetobacter Baumannii in ICU[J].Journal of Medical Information,2020,33(03):54.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.13.015]
[4]符冉冉,符方妹,黄寒梅,等.甲氧西林耐药表皮葡萄球菌的多重耐药表型分析及抗菌中药筛选[J].医学信息,2022,35(03):60.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.03.015]
　FU Ran-ran,FU Fang-mei,HUANG Han-mei,et al.Multi-drug Resistance Phenotype Analysis of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Epidermidisand Screening of Antibacterial Chinese Medicine[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(03):60.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.03.015]
[5]牟雄能,段达荣.碳青霉烯耐药肠杆菌肠道定植及其血流感染的危险因素分析[J].医学信息,2023,36(21):57.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.21.012]
　MOU Xiong-neng,DUAN Da-rong.Analysis on Colonization of Carbapenems Resistant Enterobacteriaceae and its Risk Factors of Bloodstream Infection[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(03):57.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.21.012]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01