[1]朱亚斐.胎心监护仪产时持续胎心监护对自然分娩产妇产后并发症及新生儿结局的影响[J].医学信息,2023,36(09):151-153,160.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.09.032]
　ZHU Ya-fei.Effect of Continuous Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring with Fetal Heart Rate Monitor on Postpartum Complications and Neonatal Outcomes in Natural Delivery Parturients[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(09):151-153,160.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.09.032]
点击复制

胎心监护仪产时持续胎心监护对自然分娩产妇产后并发症及新生儿结局的影响()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
36卷
期数:
2023年09期
页码:
151-153,160
栏目:
护理研究
出版日期:
2023-05-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of Continuous Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring with Fetal Heart Rate Monitor on Postpartum Complications and Neonatal Outcomes in Natural Delivery Parturients
文章编号:
1006-1959（2023）09-0151-04
作者:
朱亚斐
（天津市第三中心医院产科，天津 300170）
Author(s):
ZHU Ya-fei
(Department of Obstetrics,Tianjin Third Central Hospital,Tianjin 300170,China)
关键词:
胎心监护仪; 持续胎心监护; 自然分娩; 新生儿结局
Keywords:
Fetal heart rate monitor; Continuous fetal heart rate monitor; Natural childbirth; Neonatal outcome
分类号:
R473.71
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.09.032
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 研究胎心监护仪产时持续胎心监护对自然分娩产妇产后并发症及新生儿结局的影响。方法 选取2021年3月-2022年2月在我院待产的84例产妇为研究对象，采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组，各42例。对照组采用常规胎心监护，观察组在产时给予持续胎心监护。比较两组不同产程时间、产后并发症发生率、新生儿Apgar评分、疼痛评分、产后出血量、新生儿分娩结局。结果 观察组第一产程、第二产程、总产程均短于对照组（P＜0.05），第三产程与对照组比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；观察组产后并发症发生率为4.76%，低于对照组的16.67%（P＜0.05）；观察组新生儿Apgar评分高于对照组，产后出血量少于对照组，疼痛评分低于对照组（P＜0.05）；观察组新生儿不良妊娠结局发生率为7.14%，低于对照组的14.28%（P＜0.05）。结论 胎心监护仪产时持续胎心监护可促进自然分娩产妇产程进展，预防产后并发症，改善新生儿分娩结局，提高新生儿Apgar评分，减轻产妇分娩疼痛，减少产后出血量，对母婴安全具有积极的影响。
Abstract:
Objective To study the effect of continuous intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring with fetal heart rate monitor on postpartum complications and neonatal outcomes in natural delivery parturients.Methods From March 2021 to February 2022, 84 parturients waiting for delivery in our hospital were selected as the research objects. They were divided into control group and observation group by random number table method, with 42 cases in each group. The control group was given routine fetal heart rate monitoring, and the observation group was given continuous fetal heart rate monitoring during delivery. The duration of labor, incidence of postpartum complications, neonatal Apgar score, pain score, postpartum hemorrhage and neonatal delivery outcome were compared between the two groups.Results The first, second and total stages of labor in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05), while there was no significant difference in the third stage of labor between the observation group and the control group (P>0.05). The incidence of postpartum complications in the observation group was 4.76%, which was lower than 16.67% in the control group (P<0.05). The Apgar score of newborns in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, the amount of postpartum hemorrhage was less than that in the control group, and the pain score was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of neonatal adverse pregnancy outcomes in the observation group was 7.14%, which was lower than 14.28% in the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion Continuous fetal heart rate monitoring during delivery with fetal heart rate monitor can promote the progress of labor in natural childbirth, prevent postpartum complications, improve neonatal delivery outcome, improve neonatal Apgar score, reduce maternal delivery pain, reduce postpartum hemorrhage, and have a positive impact on maternal and child safety.

参考文献/References:

[1]李蕊,张春雨,张大程,等.产时胎心监护联合脐血pH值及新生儿Apgar评分预测新生儿结局的临床价值[J].中国妇幼保健,2017,32(8):1676-1679.[2]付艳岭,贯国京,王秀玲,等.胎心监护联合脐血流S/D及脐血气预测高危妊娠新生儿的研究[J].检验医学与临床,2017,14(13):1994-1996.[3]戚田进,孙彦玲.产前无应激胎心监护联合产时电子胎心监护的临床效果分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2019,11(1):73-76.[4]李淑芳,王妍,赵扬玉.孕晚期胎心无应激试验可疑型的长程胎心监护特点[J].中华围产医学,2016,19(12):885-889.[5]卫生健康委.卫生健康委关于印发母婴安全行动计划（2018-2020年）和健康儿童行动计划（2018-202年）的通知[J].中华人民共和国国务院公报,2018,1639(28):80-87.[6]欧阳芳芳,黄丽萍,孙玉春.胎儿远程智能监护系统的临床应用及效果观察[J].中国妇幼健康研究,2017,28(2):176-178.[7]秦燕君,邵顺芳,徐蓉,等.妊娠晚期脐血流S/D比值与NST联合预测胎儿窘迫的价值[J].浙江临床医学,2015,17(5):769-770.[8]庄晖,李利波,梁梅珍,等.妊娠期糖尿病孕妇胎儿脐动脉频谱血流收缩期最大血流速度与舒张期血流速度比值对胎儿宫内窘迫的预测价值[J].陕西医学杂志,2017,46(6):715-717.[9]谢许萍,胡燕芳,程志坚,等.超声监测脐带缠绕胎儿脐动脉及大脑中动脉血流在预测胎儿宫内窘迫中的应用[J].现代仪器与医疗,2018,24(6):39-41.[10]方金红,冯敏,顾成敏,等.妊娠中期甲状腺功能及TPO-Ab检测对预测孕妇并发症的意义[J].中国煤炭工业医学杂志,2017,20(6):661-663.[11]柯玮琳,黄静,邓明.产时彩色多普勒超声脐动脉收缩压/舒张压值联合胎心监护诊断胎儿窘迫的研究[J].山西医药杂志,2016,44(9):1010-1012.[12]洪丽莉,吴庆梅,高艳,等.孕晚期胎儿彩色多普勒超声血流多参数异常与妊娠不良结局的关系[J].临床超声医学杂志,2017,19(6):432.[13]胡志江.试论彩色多普勒超声检测胎儿宫内缺氧大脑中动脉与脐动脉血流动力学变化的临床效果[J].生物技术世界,2016(2):91.[14]王红玲.联合胎儿脐动脉血流测定与胎心监护在产前诊断中的意义[J].中国优生与遗传杂志,2017,12(5):93-94.[15]王芳.连续性胎心监护对高危孕产妇剖宫产率及新生儿结局的影响[J].河南医学研究,2018,27(23):4307-4308.[16]侯凤云.超声检测S/D比值联合胎心监护检测胎儿宫内缺氧的临床价值[J].宁夏医科大学学报,2016,38(12):1453-1455.[17]战姝妍,王立媛.新产程标准联合胎心监护在剖宫产术后阴道分娩产妇中的应用效果研究[J].医学综述,2021,16(8):44-46.[18]张春雨,李蕊,张大程,等.产程中持续电子胎心监护预测新生儿窒息的价值[J].中国妇幼保健,2017,15(3):135-137.[19]郭英,霍玉青.孕晚期胎心监护对产妇分娩方式与新生儿预后的影响[J].全科护理,2020,20(12):51-53.[20]杨健红,谭艳丽,唐红,等.胎心监护联合脐血血气分析及Apgar评分预测羊水粪染新生儿窒息的临床价值[J].广西医学,2016,15(1):165-167.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01