[1]彭心钰,陈先侠.引产时机对非药物治疗妊娠期糖尿病母婴结局的影响[J].医学信息,2023,36(11):121-125.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.11.024]
　PENG Xin-yu,CHEN Xian-xia.Effect of Different Timing of Labor Induction on Maternal and Infant Pregnancy Outcomes of Non Drug Treated Gestational Diabetes Mellitus[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(11):121-125.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.11.024]
点击复制

引产时机对非药物治疗妊娠期糖尿病母婴结局的影响()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
36卷
期数:
2023年11期
页码:
121-125
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2023-06-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of Different Timing of Labor Induction on Maternal and Infant Pregnancy Outcomes of Non Drug Treated Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
文章编号:
1006-1959（2023）11-0121-05
作者:
彭心钰; 陈先侠
（安徽医科大学附属妇幼保健院危急重产科，安徽 合肥 230000）
Author(s):
PENG Xin-yu; CHEN Xian-xia
(Critical Obstetrics Department of Maternal and Child Health Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University,Hefei 230000,Anhui,China)
关键词:
妊娠期糖尿病; 妊娠结局; 引产
Keywords:
Gestational diabetes mellitus; Pregnancy outcome; Induced labor
分类号:
R714.256
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.11.024
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨不同引产时机对非药物治疗妊娠期糖尿病（GDM）母婴妊娠结局的影响。方法 选取2021年1月-12月本院规律产检并住院分娩的GDM孕产妇191例为研究对象,根据其是否在39~39+6周引产分为39周引产组（n=81，39~39+6周引产）、39周期待妊娠组（n=110，39+6周后引产）；进一步将39周期待妊娠组分为40周引产组（n=59，40~40+6周引产）、40周期待妊娠组（n=51，40+6周后引产）。比较引产组与期待妊娠组妊娠结局、新生儿结局、剖宫产指征。结果 ①39周组中引产组剖宫产率高于期待妊娠组（P＜0.05），而两组总产程、肩难产率及产后出血量比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；40周组中引产组与期待妊娠组剖宫产率、总产程、肩难产及产后出血量比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；②39周组中期待妊娠组巨大儿发生率高于引产组（P＜0.05），而两组胎儿窘迫、新生儿窒息、新生儿低血糖及病理性黄疸发生率比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；40周组中期待妊娠组巨大儿发生率高于引产组（P＜0.05），而两组胎儿窘迫、新生儿窒息、新生儿低血糖及病理性黄疸发生率比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；③39周组中引产组因社会因素行剖宫产者人数高于期待妊娠组（P＜0.05），因其余指征行剖宫产人数比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。40周组中引产组及期待妊娠组不同指征行剖宫产人数比较，差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论 对于非药物治疗血糖控制良好的GDM孕妇，若无其他合并症，孕40~40+6周引产在提高引产成功率的同时也能在一定程度上减少不良母婴结局的发生率。
Abstract:
Objective To explore and evaluate the effect of different timing of labor induction on maternal and infant pregnancy outcomes of non drug treated gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).Methods From January to December 2021, 191 pregnant women with GDM who underwent regular prenatal examination and were hospitalized for delivery in our hospital were selected as the research objects. According to whether they had induced labor at 39-39+6 weeks, they were divided into 39 weeks induced labor group (n=81, 39-39+6 weeks induced labor) and 39 weeks expectant pregnancy (n=110, 39+6 weeks induced labor). The 39 weeks expectant pregnancy group was further divided into 40 weeks induction group (n=59, 40-40+6 weeks induced labor) and 40 weeks expectant pregnancy group (n=51, 40+6 weeks induced labor). The pregnancy outcome, neonatal outcome and cesarean section indications were compared between the induced labor group and the expected pregnancy group.Results ① In the 39 week group, the cesarean section rate in the induced labor group was higher than that in the expectant pregnancy group (P<0.05), while there was no significant difference in total labor, shoulder dystocia rate and postpartum hemorrhage between the two groups (P>0.05); in the 40 week group, there was no significant difference in cesarean section rate, total labor, shoulder dystocia and postpartum hemorrhage between the induction group and the expectant pregnancy group (P>0.05); ②In the 39 week group, the incidence of macrosomia in expectant pregnancy group was higher than that in induced labor group (P<0.05), while there was no significant difference in the incidence of fetal distress, neonatal asphyxia, neonatal hypoglycemia and pathological jaundice between the two groups (P>0.05); in the 40 week group, the incidence of macrosomia in expectant pregnancy group was higher than that in induced labor group (P<0.05), while there was no significant difference in the incidence of fetal distress, neonatal asphyxia, neonatal hypoglycemia and pathological jaundice between the two groups (P>0.05); ③In the 39 week group, the number of cesarean section due to social factors in the induced labor group was higher than that in the expected pregnancy group (P<0.05), while there was no significant difference in the number of cesarean section due to other indications (P>0.05); in the 40 week group, there was no significant difference in the number of cesarean section between the induction group and the expectant pregnancy group (P>0.05).Conclusion For GDM pregnant women with non drug treatment and good blood glucose control, if there are no other complications, induction of labor at 40-40+6 weeks of gestation can not only improve the success rate of induction of labor, but also reduce the incidence of adverse maternal and infant outcomes to a certain extent.

参考文献/References:

[1]中华医学会糖尿病学分会.中国2型糖尿病防治指南(2020年版)[J].国际内分泌代谢杂志,2021,41(5):482-548.[2]Ye W,Luo C,Huang J,et al.Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J].BMJ,2022,377:e67946.[3]陈汉青,邹粟花,杨建波,等.妊娠期糖尿病孕妇在预产期前后引产对母儿结局的影响[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2017,38(1):113-117.[4]吴侠霏,漆洪波.妊娠期糖尿病患者的分娩时机及方式[J].中华产科急救电子杂志,2021,10(1):36-39.[5]冯艳,宋新娜,徐晓萌,等.妊娠期糖尿病患者铁代谢与部分应激激素及胰岛素抵抗的关系[J].中华内分泌代谢杂志,2018,34(7):563-566.[6]霍琰,刘素新,李丽,等.丝氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂、烟酰胺磷酸核糖基转移酶、白细胞介素-6在妊娠期糖尿病患者血清中的表达及关系研究[J].中国妇幼保健,2019,34(5):1010-1012.[7]姚芳,李婧,王改梅.糖尿病合并妊娠及妊娠糖尿病的临床治疗观察[J].山西医药杂志,2020,49(3):308-310.[8]Li Y,Wang W,Zhang D.Maternal Diabetes Mellitus and Risk of Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis[J].Acta Diabetologica,2019,56(7):729-740.[9]Berger H,Gagnon R,Sermer M.Directive Clinique N Degrees 393-Le Diabete Pendant La Grossesse[J].J Obstet Gynaecol Can,2019,41(12):1826-1839.e1.[10]陈露露,石海君,漆洪波.加拿大妇产科医师协会“妊娠期糖尿病指南(2019)”要点解读[J].实用妇产科杂志,2021,37(1):23-27.[11]余昕烊,吴侠霏,漆洪波.昆士兰卫生组织《妊娠期糖尿病指南(2021年版)》要点解读[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2021,37(9):933-936.[12]中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组,中华医学会围产医学分会,中国妇幼保健协会妊娠合并糖尿病专业委员会.妊娠期高血糖诊治指南(2022)[第二部分][J].中华妇产科杂志,2022,57(2):81-90.[13]Vilchez GA,Dai J,Hoyos LR,et al.Labor and Neonatal Outcomes After Term Induction of Labor in Gestational Diabetes[J].Journal of Perinatology,2015,35(11):924-929.[14]Sutton AL,Mele L,Landon MB,et al.Delivery Timing and Cesarean Delivery Risk in Women with Mild Gestational Diabetes Mellitus[J].American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,2014,211(3):241-244.[15]樊晓然.促宫颈成熟药物对延期妊娠孕妇分娩结局及围产儿的影响[J].海南医学,2014,25(9):1289-1291.[16]Ponti L,Ghinassi S,Tani F.Spontaneous and Induced Labor: Association with Maternal Well-Being Three Months After Childbirth[J].Psychology,Health & Medicine,2022,27(4):896-901.[17]谢玲娟,张雅丽,赵晶.引产方式及时机对妊娠期糖尿病患者妊娠结局的影响[J].中国妇幼健康研究,2020,31(3):382-386.[18]韩宁,赵红阳,徐冬梅,等.妊娠期糖尿病孕妇血糖控制状况与围产结局的关系[J].郑州大学学报(医学版),2022,57(3):387-391.[19]Kang X,Liang Y,Wang S,et al.Prediction Model Comparison for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus with Macrosomia Based On Risk Factor Investigation[J].J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med,2021,34(15):2481-2490.[20]Yamamoto JM,Donovan LE,Mohammad K,et al.Severe Neonatal Hypoglycaemia and Intrapartum Glycaemic Control in Pregnancies Complicated by Type 1,Type 2 and Gestational Diabetes[J].Diabetic Medicine,2019,37(1):138-146.[21]王润秋,桑琳,杜世华.妊娠期糖尿病患者不同孕期脂代谢及巨大儿发生[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2020,28(2):251-256.

相似文献/References:

[1]范新婷.层级护理在妊娠期糖尿病孕妇剖宫产中的应用研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(02):168.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.02.065]
　FAN Xin-ting.Study on the Application of Hierarchical Nursing in Cesarean Section of Pregnant Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(11):168.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.02.065]
[2]孟召然,李 玲,范建辉.妊娠期糖尿病相关危险因素分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(04):81.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.04.026]
　MENG Zhao-ran,LI Ling,FAN Jian-hui.Analysis of Risk Factors Related to Gestational Diabetes Mellitus[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(11):81.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.04.026]
[3]王 荣.诺和锐特充治疗妊娠期糖尿病的临床效果观察[J].医学信息,2018,31(08):186.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.08.069]
　WANG Rong.Clinical Observation on the Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus with Novoterol[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(11):186.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.08.069]
[4]刘亚男.不同治疗时机行宫颈环扎术对宫颈机能不全患者的 疗效及妊娠结局的影响研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(10):101.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.10.031]
　LIU Ya-nan.Study on the Effect of Cervical Ring Ligation in Different Time of Treatment on Patients with Cervical Incompetence and Pregnancy Outcome[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(11):101.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.10.031]
[5]李雪莲.妊娠合并糖尿病对分娩结局的影响观察[J].医学信息,2018,31(10):114.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.10.036]
　LI Xue-lian.Effect of Pregnancy Complicated with Diabetes on Delivery Outcome[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(11):114.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.10.036]
[6]马荣花,王莉云,沈源春,等.胚胎移植前宫腔内灌注hCG对FET反复着床失败患者 妊娠结局的影响[J].医学信息,2018,31(13):81.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.13.023]
　MA Rong-hua,WANG Li-yun,SHEN Yuan-chun,et al.Effect of Intrauterine Perfusion of hCG before Embryo Transfer on Pregnancy Outcome in Patients with FET Repeated Implantation Failure[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(11):81.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.13.023]
[7]屈利洁.围生期综合护理措施及营养干预对妊娠期糖尿病患者的价值[J].医学信息,2018,31(15):171.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.15.057]
　QU Li-jie.The Value of Perinatal Comprehensive Nursing Measures and Nutritional Intervention in Gestational Diabetes Patients[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(11):171.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.15.057]
[8]吕丽敏.优质护理干预对高危妊娠产妇心理状态及妊娠结局的影响[J].医学信息,2018,31(17):178.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.17.057]
　LV Li-min.Effect of Quality Nursing Intervention on Psychological Status and Pregnancy Outcome of High risk Pregnant Women[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(11):178.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.17.057]
[9]刘玉静,朱 静.产后护理管理对妊娠期糖尿病患者血糖控制及疾病认知水平的影响[J].医学信息,2018,31(23):180.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.23.053]
　LIU Yu-jing,ZHU Jing.Effect of Postpartum Nursing Management on Blood Glucose Control and Disease Cognition of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Patients[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(11):180.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.23.053]
[10]于素芳.妊娠期糖尿病的综合干预及药物治疗[J].医学信息,2019,32(01):59.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.01.020]
　YU Su-fang.Comprehensive Intervention and Drug Therapy for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(11):59.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.01.020]
[11]吴凌云.临床护理路径在妊娠期糖尿病合并妊娠期高血压患者中的应用[J].医学信息,2019,32(10):181.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.10.061]
　WU Ling-yun.Application of Clinical Nursing Pathway in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Complicated with Gestational Hypertension[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(11):181.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.10.061]
[12]程 敏,李 青,陈 彬.妊娠体重增加对妊娠期糖尿病的肥胖患者妊娠结局及新生儿结局的影响[J].医学信息,2024,37(10):113.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.10.023]
　CHENG Min,LI Qing,CHEN Bin.Effect of Gestational Weight Gain on Pregnancy Outcome and Neonatal Outcome in Obese Patients with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus[J].Journal of Medical Information,2024,37(11):113.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.10.023]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01