[1]彭超艳.红外线理疗对剖宫产切口感染控制与微循环的改善作用[J].医学信息,2023,36(14):170-172.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.14.037]
　PENG Chao-yan.Effect of Infrared Physiotherapy on the Control of Cesarean Section Incision Infection and the Improvement of Microcirculation[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(14):170-172.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.14.037]
点击复制

红外线理疗对剖宫产切口感染控制与微循环的改善作用()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
36卷
期数:
2023年14期
页码:
170-172
栏目:
护理研究
出版日期:
2023-07-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of Infrared Physiotherapy on the Control of Cesarean Section Incision Infection and the Improvement of Microcirculation
文章编号:
1006-1959（2023）14-0170-03
作者:
彭超艳
（莲花县妇幼保健院护理部，江西 莲花 337100）
Author(s):
PENG Chao-yan
(Department of Nursing,Lianhua County Maternal and Child Health Hospital,Lianhua 337100,Jiangxi,China)
关键词:
切口感染; 微循环; 红外线理疗
Keywords:
Incision infection; Microcirculation; Infrared physiotherapy
分类号:
R473.71
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.14.037
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 评价切口感染的剖宫产产妇给予红外线照射治疗前后微循环及感染情况的变化。方法 纳入2019年1月-2021年6月在我院产科治疗的切口感染剖宫产产妇60例。按照随机数字表法分为红外线理疗组（30例）与对照组（30例）。比较两组产妇治疗前后宫颈血管清晰度、微血管直径、血流灌注与毛细血管直径及疗效。结果 红外线理疗组治疗后宫颈血管清晰度高于对照组（P＜0.05）；红外线理疗组治疗后血流灌注、微血管直径、毛细血管直径高于对照组（P＜0.05）；红外线理疗组有效率为95.92%，高于对照组的81.63%（P＜0.05）。结论 剖宫产切口产妇给予常规抗感染与红外线照射联合治疗能较好地改善产妇局部微循环，疗效更高。
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the changes of microcirculation and infection in women undergoing cesarean section with incision infection before and after infrared radiation treatment.Methods From January 2019 to June 2021, 60 cesarean section women with incision infection treated in our hospital were included. According to the random number table method, they were divided into infrared physiotherapy group (30 women) and control group (30 women). The cervical vascular clarity, microvascular diameter, blood perfusion, capillary diameter and curative effect were compared between the two groups before and after treatment.Results After treatment, the clarity of cervical blood vessels in the infrared physiotherapy group was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, the blood perfusion, microvascular diameter and capillary diameter of the infrared physiotherapy group were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). The effective rate of the infrared physiotherapy group was 95.92%, which was higher than 81.63% of the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion The combined treatment of conventional anti-infection and infrared irradiation can improve the local microcirculation of parturients with cesarean section incision, and the curative effect is higher.

参考文献/References:

[1]史扬,庞立彦,罗晓华,等.急诊剖宫产术后切口感染危险因素分析[J].中国实验诊断学,2021,25(7):994-997.[2]刘秋莲.剖宫产切口感染产妇病原菌分布和炎症细胞因子检测价值[J].中国妇幼保健,2021,36(15):3481-3483.[3]Valent AM,De Armond C,Houston JM,et al.Effect of Post-Cesarean Delivery Oral Cephalexin and Metronidazole on Surgical Site Infection Among Obese Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial[J].JAMA,2017,318(11):1026-1034.[4]Saeed KB,Corcoran P,Greene RA.Incisional surgical site infection following cesarean section: A national retrospective cohort study[J].Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2019,240:256-260.[5]Tuuli MG,Liu J,Tita ATN,et al.Effect of Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs Standard Wound Dressing on Surgical-Site Infection in Obese Women After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial[J].JAMA,2020,324(12):1180-1189.[6]Tolcher MC,Whitham MD,El-Nashar SA,et al.Chlorhexidine-Alcohol Compared with Povidone-Iodine Preoperative Skin Antisepsis for Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J].Am J Perinatol,2019,36(2):118-123.[7]Kawakita T,Iqbal SN,Landy HJ,et al.Reducing Cesarean Delivery Surgical Site Infections: A Resident-Driven Quality Initiative[J].Obstet Gynecol,2019,133(2):282-288.[8]张怡群,崔腾云.芒硝与大黄外敷联合红外线局部照射预防切口愈合不良的效果[J].检验医学与临床,2019,16(22):3363-3365.[9]王文华,韩晓梅,姬响华,等.水胶体敷料对压疮合并中重度感染的临床疗效[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2019,29(6):949-952.[10]谷华.头孢唑林钠与头孢替安预防剖宫产术后感染的疗效比较[J].山西医药杂志,2019,48(2):195-197.[11]张凯,苏禹,宋红艳,等.剖宫产术后产褥感染的病原菌分布、耐药性及PCT、CRP水平变化[J].实验与检验医学,2021,39(3):680-683,693.[12]丁慧,郑九生.剖宫产切口感染病原菌分布、耐药性及危险因素分析[J].江西医药,2019,54(6):638-640.[13]李苗苗,李影,吴秋红.瘢痕子宫产妇剖宫产术后切口感染病原菌分布及危险因素分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2020,35(9):1615-1618.[14]王海波,逯彩虹,李萍,等.剖宫产子宫切口瘢痕憩室形成的相关因素分析[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2020,28(1):123-126.[15]潘珏蓉,韦卉,陈滢,等.血清中糖化血红蛋白和白蛋白水平预测妊娠期糖尿病产妇剖宫产术后感染风险的临床价值[J].河北医学,2021,27(7):1205-1209.[16]李远珺,叶维娅,马忠芸,等.妊娠期糖尿病孕妇剖宫产术后切口感染影响因素分析[J].中国消毒学杂志,2019,36(1):32-35.[17]丁小玲,马厚芝.组织学绒毛膜羊膜炎对剖宫产术后感染的影响及原因分析[J].实用医院临床杂志,2020,17(4):200-202.[18]杨丽娟,于慧.产科手术切口感染的病原学特征及危险因素分析[J].宁夏医学杂志,2019,41(10):928-930.[19]李明,潘旭.剖宫产产妇术后切口感染者血清炎性应激指标与应激激素和免疫应答的相关性[J].中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版),2019,13(1):70-75.[20]陈娟娟,陈敦金.剖宫产手术并发子宫切口感染[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2019,35(2):167-171.

相似文献/References:

[1]李 焰,蒲玉平,郑 轲,等.甲状腺癌术后不同时间拔除引流条的效果分析[J].医学信息,2019,32(04):116.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.04.037]
　LI Yan,PU Yu-ping,ZHENG Ke,et al.Analysis of the Effect of Removing Drainage Strips at Different Times after Thyroid Cancer Operation[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(14):116.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.04.037]
[2]崔 爽.手术室护理干预在预防胃肠道手术患者切口感染中的应用效果[J].医学信息,2021,34(17):184.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.17.051]
　CUI Shuang.Effect of Nursing Intervention in Operating Room on Preventing Wound Infection in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Surgery[J].Journal of Medical Information,2021,34(14):184.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.17.051]
[3]王 艳,胡 敏.弱视发病机制及眼底微循环改变的研究进展[J].医学信息,2023,36(07):166.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.07.034]
　WANG Yan,HU Min.Research Progress on Pathogenesis of Amblyopia and Fundus Microcirculation Changes[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(14):166.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.07.034]
[4]程佳伟,施 健,张 琪,等.老年面部皮肤肿瘤患者术后切口感染风险的临床预测模型的构建[J].医学信息,2024,37(08):46.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.08.008]
　CHENG Jia-wei,SHI Jian,ZHANG Qi,et al.Construction of a Clinical Prediction Model for the Risk of Postoperative Incision Infection in Elderly Patients with Facial Skin Tumors[J].Journal of Medical Information,2024,37(14):46.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.08.008]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01