[1]王巧婷,严 鑫,潘其达.超瓷树脂嵌体与美塑树脂嵌体修复治疗磨牙缺损的效果研究[J].医学信息,2024,37(22):114-117.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.22.028]
　WANG Qiaoting,YAN Xin,PAN Qida.Study on the Effect of Resin Overlay and HRi Inlay in the Treatment of Molar Defect[J].Journal of Medical Information,2024,37(22):114-117.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.22.028]
点击复制

超瓷树脂嵌体与美塑树脂嵌体修复治疗磨牙缺损的效果研究()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
37卷
期数:
2024年22期
页码:
114-117
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2024-11-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on the Effect of Resin Overlay and HRi Inlay in the Treatment of Molar Defect
文章编号:
1006-1959（2024）22-0114-04
作者:
王巧婷1; 严 鑫1; 潘其达2
1.信丰县人民医院口腔科，江西 信丰 341600；2.寻乌县中医院口腔科，江西 寻乌 342200
Author(s):
WANG Qiaoting1; YAN Xin1; PAN Qida2
1.Department of Stomatology,Xinfeng County People’s Hospital,Xinfeng 341600,Jiangxi,China;2.Department of Stomatology,Xunwu County Hospital of traditional Chinese medicine,Xunwu 342200,Jiangxi,China
关键词:
超瓷树脂嵌体; 美塑树脂嵌体; 修复; 磨牙缺损
Keywords:
Resin overlay; HRi inlay; Restoration; Molar defect
分类号:
R783.4
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.22.028
摘要:
目的 研究超瓷树脂嵌体与美塑树脂嵌体修复治疗磨牙缺损的临床疗效。方法 选取2022年1月-2023年10月我院收治的磨牙缺损患者68例为研究对象，共计100颗患牙，按照嵌体使用不同将患者分为超瓷树脂嵌体组（50颗）和美塑树脂嵌体组（50颗）。比较两组治疗效果、牙齿缺陷发生率、牙周健康指标（附着水平、牙周袋探诊深度、牙龈出血指数）及治疗满意度。结果 超瓷树脂嵌体组治疗成功率（96.00%）与美塑树脂嵌体组（98.00%）比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；美塑树脂嵌体组牙齿缺陷发生率（4.00%）低于超瓷树脂嵌体组（12.00%）（P＜0.05）；两组治疗后附着水平、牙周袋探诊深度、牙龈出血指数均小于治疗前（P＜0.05），但超瓷树脂嵌体组与美塑树脂嵌体组比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；超瓷树脂嵌体组治疗满意度（98.00%）与美塑树脂嵌体组（100.00%）比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论 超瓷树脂嵌体与美塑树脂嵌体修复治疗磨牙缺损均可实现较理想的效果，且均可在观察时限里表现出较好的美学、边缘密合性良好，患者治疗满意高。但美塑树脂嵌体修复治疗牙齿缺陷发生率相对较低，临床可根据实际需求合理选择修复材料。
Abstract:
Objective To study the clinical effect of resin overlay and HRi inlay in the treatment of molar defect.Methods A total of 68 patients with molar defects admitted to our hospital from January 2022 to October 2023 were selected as the research objects, with 100 affected teeth. According to the different use of inlays, the patients were divided into resin overlay group (50 teeth) and HRi inlay group (50 teeth). The treatment effect, incidence of tooth defects, periodontal health indicators (attachment level, probing depth of periodontal pocket, gingival bleeding index) and treatment satisfaction were compared between the two groups.Results There was no significant difference in the success rate of treatment between the resin overlay group (96.00%) and the HRi inlay group (98.00%) (P>0.05). The incidence of tooth defects in the HRi inlay group (4.00%) was lower than that in the resin overlay group (12.00%) (P<0.05). The attachment level, periodontal pocket depth and gingival bleeding index of the two groups after treatment were lower than those before treatment (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the resin overlay group and the HRi inlay group (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in treatment satisfaction between the resin overlay group (98.00%) and the HRi inlay group (100.00%) (P>0.05).Conclusion Both resin overlay and HRi inlay group can achieve ideal results in the treatment of molar defects, and both can show good aesthetics and good marginal fit in the observation time limit, and the patients are satisfied with the treatment. However, the incidence of dental defects treated with resin overlay restoration is relatively low, and the repair materials can be reasonably selected according to the actual needs.

参考文献/References:

[1]赵莉,庄友梅,陈晓涛.树脂超瓷嵌体与复合树脂充填用于根管治疗后牙体大面积缺损修复的临床疗效对比[J].广西医学,2018(20):2420-2423,2426.[2]何珍,熊建群.全瓷体与复合树脂体修复上颌前牙牙体缺损的效果比较[J].西南国防医药,2016,26(2):179-180.[3]裴会青,刘丽霞,杨丽华.氧化锆陶瓷与复合树脂用于根管治疗后牙体缺损修复的效果比较[J].中国美容医学,2023,32(10):135-138.[3]黄捷,黄勇,赵鑫.间接树脂嵌体修复和复合树脂直接充填磨牙大面积牙体缺损在老年患者中的临床价值[J].中国医疗美容,2018,8(1):54-56.[4]黄雪梅,徐星,张丽娟.乳牙树脂嵌体修复儿童乳磨牙大面积缺损的效果分析[J].广州医科大学学报,2018,46(4):44-47.[5]史恒瑞.3种不同材料修复无髓年轻第一恒磨牙的临床研究[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2021,37(2):216-219.[6]刘磊.两种不同嵌体材料修复磨牙大面积缺损的效果比较[J].现代诊断与治疗,2016,27(16):2962-2963.[7赵国廷,李伟,姚毅章.排龈术联合3Mz350纳米复合树脂充填治疗双侧上颌前磨牙楔状缺损的临床价值[J].国际检验医学杂志,2017,38(21):3046-3048.[8]董丽敏,武啸,李冰.树脂嵌体在乳牙牙体缺损修复中的应用[J].中国药物与临床,2017,17(2):213-216.[9]李晓刚,任辉,宋元玲,等.纳米复合树脂材料和光固化复合树脂材料在前牙美容修复中的对比研究[J].山西医药杂志,2017,46(22):2771-2772.[10]魏振辉,孙贺婷,高志银,等.不同材料高嵌体修复大面积缺损的上颌第一前磨牙有限元分析[J].口腔医学研究,2020,36(11):1065-1068.[11]欧阳骞,黄月苏,杨竹倩,等.桩核冠修复和CAD/CAM铸瓷高嵌体修复磨牙缺损的临床效果[J].昆明医科大学学报,2020,41(10):124-128.[12]张敏,董凯丽,沈逸洲.CAD/CAM全瓷高嵌体修复磨牙大面积牙体缺损的临床疗效评价[J].北京口腔医学,2020,28(2):104-106.[13]庞恋苏,李亚男.弹性义齿和传统可摘义齿修复肯氏Ⅲ类磨牙缺损的临床效果比较[J].中华老年口腔医学杂志,2018,16(2):94-97.[14]强卫林,李雨轩,刘刚,等.3种边缘设计铸瓷高嵌体修复不同程度缺损无髓磨牙的3年对比研究[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2018,36(5):35-39.[15]郭晓钰,徐秀清,陈慧芬,等.CAD/CAM高嵌体修复磨牙大面积牙体缺损的疗效评价[J].牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志,2018,28(9):529-532.[16]刘小舟,贾兴亚,张忠提.复合树脂、陶瓷嵌体对MOD缺损牙体组织修复体界面应力及其分布的影响[J].山东医药,2018,58(32):17-20.[17]赵楚翘,徐一驰,刘定坤,等.髓腔固位冠及桩核冠修复下颌第一磨牙大面积缺损的生物力学分析[J].口腔医学研究,2018,34(5):513-517.[18]张国庆,曹谅,姜晓南,等.下颌第一磨牙邻k面大面积缺损不同修复方案的生物力学效果[J].江苏医药,2018,44(2):129-132.[19]傅露,操亚波,谷子芽,等.VITA树脂嵌体修复儿童和青少年第一磨牙缺损的临床评价[J].口腔医学,2017,37(12):1075-1078.[20]刘雪梅,邱晓峰.不同方法修复磨牙大面积缺损的疗效比较[J].河北医科大学学报,2020,41(3):328-331.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01