[1]彭雪琴.宫颈上皮内瘤变宫颈锥切术后复发的影响因素分析[J].医学信息,2025,38(05):136-139.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2025.05.023]
　PENG Xueqin.Analysis of Influencing Factors of Recurrence After Cervical Conization of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia[J].Journal of Medical Information,2025,38(05):136-139.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2025.05.023]
点击复制

宫颈上皮内瘤变宫颈锥切术后复发的影响因素分析()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
38卷
期数:
2025年05期
页码:
136-139
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2025-03-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of Influencing Factors of Recurrence After Cervical Conization of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
文章编号:
1006-1959（2025）05-0136-04
作者:
彭雪琴
永丰县人民医院妇产科，江西 永丰 331500
Author(s):
PENG Xueqin
PENG Xueqin
关键词:
高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变; 宫颈锥切术; 高危型HPV感染; HPV转阴率
Keywords:
High-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia;  Cervical conization;  High-risk HPV infection;  HPV negative conversion rate
分类号:
R737.3
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2025.05.023
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 分析高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变患者宫颈锥切术后复发的影响因素。方法 选取2020年1月-2023年8月永丰县人民医院收治的120例宫颈上皮内瘤变患者为研究对象，所有患者均行宫颈液基细胞检查、HPV基因型检测、阴道镜病理活检，并于宫颈锥切术后随访。比较不同分级宫颈上皮内瘤变患者高危型HPV感染率和感染类型，以及高危型HPV感染与低危型HPV感染患者宫颈锥切术后HPV转阴率；另采用多因素Logistic回归分析宫颈上皮内瘤变患者宫颈锥切术后复发的危险因素。结果 120例宫颈上皮内瘤变患者中，59例患者为高危型HPV阳性，主要为HPV16、HPV18、HPV52、HPV58四种高危型HPV类型，不同分级宫颈上皮内瘤变患者高危型HPV感染类型比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05），但宫颈上皮内瘤变级别越高，高危型HPV感染率越高（P＜0.05）；高危型HPV感染的宫颈上皮内瘤变患者宫颈锥切术后转阴率低于低危型HPV感染患者（P＜0.05）；在随访期间，60例患者复发，复发的宫颈上皮内瘤变患者与未复发的宫颈上皮内瘤变患者在年龄、绝经、宫颈锥切术前HPV感染类型、宫颈上皮内瘤变分级、腺体累及和宫颈锥切术后HPV持续感染比较，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；多因素Logistic回归分析显示，宫颈上皮内瘤变3级、腺体累及、宫颈锥切术前高危型HPV感染和宫颈锥切术后高危型HPV持续感染是宫颈上皮内瘤变复发的独立影响因素。结论 宫颈上皮内瘤变宫颈锥切术后复发与宫颈上皮内瘤变级别、腺体累及、宫颈锥切术前高危型HPV感染和宫颈锥切术后高危型HPV持续感染密切相关，针对存在上述影响因素的患者，宫颈锥切术后应加强随访。
Abstract:
Objective To analyze the influencing factors of recurrence after cervical conization in patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Methods A total of 120 patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia admitted to Yongfeng County People’s Hospital from January 2020 to August 2023 were selected as the research objects. All patients underwent cervical liquid-based cell examination, HPV genotype detection, colposcopy pathological biopsy, and were followed up after cervical conization. The infection rate and type of high-risk HPV in patients with different grades of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, and the negative rate of HPV after cervical conization in patients with high-risk HPV infection and low-risk HPV infection were compared. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the risk factors of recurrence after cervical conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Results Among 120 patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, 59 patients were positive for high-risk HPV, mainly HPV16, HPV18, HPV52, HPV58 four high-risk HPV types. There was no significant difference in high-risk HPV infection types in patients with different grades of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (P>0.05), but the higher the grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, the higher the infection rate of high-risk HPV (P<0.05). The negative conversion rate of patients with high-risk HPV infection after cervical conization was lower than that of patients with low-risk HPV infection (P<0.05). During the follow-up period, 60 patients relapsed, there were significant differences in age, menopause, type of HPV infection before cervical conization, grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, gland involvement and persistent HPV infection after cervical conization between patients with recurrent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and patients without recurrent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (P<0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3, glandular involvement, high-risk HPV infection before cervical conization and high-risk HPV persistent infection after cervical conization were independent influencing factors for recurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Conclusion The recurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after cervical conization is closely related to the grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, glandular involvement, high-risk HPV infection before cervical conization and high-risk HPV persistent infection after cervical conization. For patients with the above influencing factors, follow-up should be strengthened after cervical conization.

参考文献/References:

[1]边磊,韩洁,许冬蕾,等.不同宫颈病变患者高危型人乳头瘤病毒感染情况及宫颈锥切术后复发的影响因素分析[J].河北医科大学学报,2021,42(11):1289-1293.[2]张琳,刘昊,刘玉玲.宫颈锥切术后高危型人乳头瘤病毒转归的相关因素分析[J].广东医学,2021,42(11):1279-1284.[3]张琳.高危型HPV感染HSIL患者子宫颈锥切术后阴道微生态与HPV转归的相关性研究[D].大连:大连医科大学,2020.[4]张阳,罗美,何鑫,等.高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变及早期宫颈癌子宫切除术后患者高危型人乳头瘤病毒消退规律及相关因素分析[J].首都医科大学学报,2018,39(6):864-870.[5]林俊.高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变宫颈锥切术后高危型人乳头瘤病毒转归影响因素[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2022,30(5):1098-1101.[6]周佳怡,张跃明,何静,等.高级别宫颈鳞状上皮内病变患者宫颈锥切术后高危型人乳头瘤病毒持续感染的相关因素分析[J].肿瘤预防与治疗,2021,34(5):408-413.[7]万颖,马鸿云,田春花,等.血清鳞状细胞癌相关抗原水平、高危型人乳头瘤病毒感染状态与宫颈癌术后复发的关系分析[J].中国性科学,2022,31(10):102-105.[8]沈晓月,周建军,陆菲菲.高危型人乳头瘤病毒感染对体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子显微注射胚胎移植术后临床结局的影响[J].安徽医药,2018,22(9):1759-1762.[9]钟继生,毛毅影,梁罕超,等.惠州地区妇女高危型人乳头瘤病毒感染特征及相关因素研究[J].中国妇幼保健,2019,34(23):5369-5372.[10]王文平,刘玉娟.聚焦超声治疗高危型人乳头瘤病毒感染合并宫颈低度病变的疗效观察[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2022,14(4):81-84,89.[11]蔡江义,崔旭,秦岭,等.高危型人乳头瘤病毒基因分型聚合酶链式反应检测技术在宫颈癌筛查中的应用分析[J].安徽医药,2021,25(9):1839-1842.[12]裴蕊欣,武彩红,闫佳欣,等.多环芳烃暴露对高危型人乳头瘤病毒感染转归影响的前瞻性队列研究[J].中华流行病学杂志,2021,42(11):2060-2065.[13]武彩红,裴蕊欣,闫佳欣,等.红细胞叶酸对高危型人乳头瘤病毒感染转归影响的前瞻性队列研究[J].中华流行病学杂志,2021,42(12):2174-2178.[14]王晓丹,汤丽荣.高危型人乳头瘤病毒感染与宫颈癌前病变的相关性研究[J].医学研究杂志,2020,49(9):137-140,5.[15]董婕,陈瑛瑛,王凯怡.高危型人乳头瘤病毒癌基因-E6/E7mRNA检测的临床价值[J].中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版),2018,14(5):527-534.[16]翟青枝,王雪琪,于丹,等.高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变患者高危型人乳头瘤病毒型别分布及其预后[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2021,31(10):1576-1580.[17]樊荣,王雪梅.妊娠妇女高危型人乳头瘤病毒感染特点及基因分型[J].中国实验诊断学,2023,27(6):674-677.[18]邵招凤,戚秀秀,杨玲飞,等.宫颈上皮内瘤变患者感染高危型人乳头瘤病毒载量水平及临床意义[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2021,31(22):3453-3457.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01