[1]肖宝强,张 霆,孙新增,等.腹腔镜与开腹根治术对进展期胃癌患者的近期疗效、 应激水平、免疫功能影响的差异性研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(14):75-80.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.14.022]
　XIAO Bao-qiang,ZHANG Ting,SUN Xin-zeng,et al.Differences between Laparoscopic and Open Radical Resection for Short-term Efficacy, Stress Level and Immune Function in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(14):75-80.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.14.022]
点击复制

腹腔镜与开腹根治术对进展期胃癌患者的近期疗效、 应激水平、免疫功能影响的差异性研究()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
31卷
期数:
2018年14期
页码:
75-80
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2018-07-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Differences between Laparoscopic and Open Radical Resection for Short-term Efficacy, Stress Level and Immune Function in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer
文章编号:
1006-1959（2018）14-0075-06
作者:
肖宝强; 张 霆; 孙新增; 石 磊; 牛 悦
解放军第二五四医院普通外科，天津 300142
Author(s):
XIAO Bao-qiang; ZHANG Ting; SUN Xin-zeng; SHI Lei; NIU Yue
Department of General Surgery,the 254 Hospital of PLA,Tianjin 300142,China
关键词:
胃肿瘤; 进展期胃癌; 免疫功能; 肿瘤微转移
Keywords:
Key words：Gastric neoplasms; Advanced gastric cancer; Immune function; Tumor micrometastasis
分类号:
R735.2
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.14.022
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨腹腔镜与开腹根治术对进展期胃癌患者的近期疗效、应激水平、免疫功能影响的差异。方法 收集2015年1月~2017年10月我院收治的行腹腔镜或开腹根治性切除术的141例胃癌患者临床资料。根据手术方式的不同，将患者分为腹腔镜组79例，开腹组62例。从近期疗效、应激水平相关指标、免疫功能指标、肿瘤微转移指标等方面比较两种手术方式的差异。结果 ①与开腹组相比，腹腔镜组患者术中失血量较少，术后排气时间及住院时间较短，但住院费用较高，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。但两组患者的术后并发症发生率及并发症类型差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。②两组患者WBC计数、外周血N%在所有时间点差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。腹腔镜组外周血CRP水平、COR水平在术后1 d、术后3 d两个时间均小于开腹组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。与开腹组相比，腹腔镜组腹引液IL-6水平在术后所有时间点均较小，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。③两组患者外周血IgG、IgA、IgM、C4水平在所有时间点差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。与开腹组相比，腹腔镜组患者外周血C4水平在术后1 d、术后3 d较高，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05），其他时间点两组患者C4水平差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。腹腔镜组患者腹引液IL-10水平在术后所有时间点均高于开腹组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。④手术结束时，腹腔镜组腹腔冲洗液CEA水平、DDC水平均小于开腹组，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 对于进展期胃癌，与开腹手术相比，腹腔镜治疗具有术后恢复快、应激创伤小、免疫抑制功能低、肿瘤微转移几率小等优点。
Abstract:
Abstract：Objective To investigate the effects of laparoscopic and open radical resection on the short-term efficacy,stress level and immune function of patients with advanced gastric cancer.Methods The clinical data of 141 patients with gastric cancer who underwent laparoscopic or open radical resection from January 2015 to October 2017 were collected.According to the different surgical methods,the patients were divided into laparoscopic group(n=79)and open group(n=62).The differences between the two surgical methods were compared in terms of short-term efficacy,stress-related indicators,immune function indicators,and tumor micrometastasis indicators.Results ①Compared with the open group, the laparoscopic group had less blood loss during operation,and the postoperative exhaust time and hospitalization time were shorter,but the hospitalization cost was higher,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).However,there was no significant difference in postoperative complication rate and type of complications between the two groups(P>0.05).②There were no significant differences in WBC count and peripheral blood N% between the two groups at all time points (P>0.05). The CRP level and COR level in the peripheral blood of the laparoscopic group were lower than those in the open group at 1 d and 3 d after operation,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Compared with the open group, the level of IL-6 in the laparoscopic group was small at all time points after operation,and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).③The levels of IgG,IgA,IgM and C4 in peripheral blood of the two groups were not statistically significant at all time points(P>0.05).Compared with the open group,the C4 level in peripheral blood of patients in the laparoscopic group was higher at 1 d and 3 d after operation,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).At other time points,there was no significant difference in C4 levels between the two groups(P>0.05).In the laparoscopic group,IL-10 levels in the abdominal drainage were higher than those in the open group at all time points after surgery,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).④ At the end of the operation,the CEA level and DDC level of the peritoneal washing fluid in the laparoscopic group were lower than those in the open group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion For advanced gastric cancer,compared with open surgery,laparoscopic treatment has the advantages of rapid postoperative recovery,low stress trauma,low immunosuppressive function,and small micrometastasis.

参考文献/References:

[1]姜思源,张锦.手术应激后低蛋白血症启因及治疗的最新进展[J].中华危重病急救医学,2017,29(3):284-288. [2]乔洪林.手术室开展心理支持对普外科患者手术依从性和应激状况的影响[J].中国伤残医学,2016(1):152-153. [3]李国新,胡彦锋,刘浩.中国腹腔镜胃肠外科研究组CLASS-01研究进展[J].中华消化外科杂志,2017,16(1):38-42. [4]汪大田,张亚铭,马军,等.腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术的技术难点[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2015,18(2):187-189. [5]Sun XF,He ZR.Effect of laparoscope and open radical resection on immunological and stress levels in patients with advanced gastric cancer[J].Journal of Hainan Medical University,2016,22(22):82-84. [6]Park YK,Yoon HM,Kim YW,et al.Laparoscopy-Assisted versus Open D2 Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer:Results from a Randomized PhaseⅡ Multicenter Clinical Trial(COACT 1001)[J].Annals of Surgery,2017,42(9):S98-S99. [7]陆宏伟,张亚飞,吉鸿,等.腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的疗效与安全性[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2015,22(3):317-321. [8]彭朝阳,丁恒一,司建伟.腹腔镜和开腹原发灶切除联合D2淋巴结清扫术治疗老年进展期胃癌临床对比研究[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2017(7):848-853. [9]Hübner M,Mantziari S,Demartines N,et al.Postoperative Albumin Drop Is a Marker for Surgical Stress and a Predictor for Clinical Outcome:A Pilot Study[J].Gastroenterology Research and Practice,2016(7):8743187. [10]纪巧荣,张伟.交感-肾上腺素系统与低氧应激[J].青海医学院学报,2016,37(4):277-280. [11]韩闻卿,姜雅秋.应激时中枢性胰高血糖素样肽1对下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴作用的研究进展[J].医学综述,2016,22(19):3753-3756. [12]王维健,政峰,沈晓览.腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗粘连性肠梗阻对C反应蛋白、前白蛋白和降钙素原的影响[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2015(4):399-401. [13]凌云,方玉明,徐文鹏.PCT、CRP在创伤性脑损伤患者中的检测意义[J].临床输血与检验,2015,17(4):309-311. [14]黄思辉,李荣江,高峰,等.腹部严重创伤患者血浆CRP/APN比值的临床意义[J].吉林医药学院学报,2015,36(3):173-175. [15]Aleksandrova K,Jenab M,Boeing H,et al.Circulating C-Reactive Protein Concentrations and Risks of Colon and Rectal Cancer[J].American Journal of Epidemiology,2015,172(4):407. [16]马长华,袁林辉,李昌,等.胃癌手术老年患者不同麻醉方案免疫功能比较[J].重庆医学,2015(29):4138-4140. [17]丛仔红,陈坤明.麻醉深度对中老年胃肠道手术患者术后认知程度、外周血炎性因子及细胞免疫功能的影响[J].解放军医药杂志,2016,28(9):100-103. [18]李治刚.胃癌根治术后行早期肠内免疫营养支持促进机体胃肠、免疫功能恢复的临床研究[J].海南医学院学报,2016,22(10):988-991. [19]周扬,付蔚华.胃癌淋巴结微转移的研究进展[J].国际肿瘤学杂志,2016,43(10):791-794. [20]宋玉成.胃癌患者术前腹腔冲洗液检测CEA、CA125的临床意义[D].福建中医药大学,2015.

相似文献/References:

[1]王绥能,梁贤文,孙 光,等.伊立替康新辅助化疗在进展期胃癌的临床意义[J].医学信息,2018,31(24):164.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.24.050]
　WANG Sui-neng,LIANG Xian-wen,SUN Guang,et al.Clinical Significance of Irinotecan Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Gastric Carcinoma[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(14):164.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.24.050]
[2]贾泽斌,蒋浩海.腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的临床疗效及近期预后观察[J].医学信息,2022,35(20):45.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.20.010]
　JIA Ze-bin,JIANG Hao-hai.Clinical Efficacy and Short-term Prognosis of Laparoscopic-assisted Radical Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(14):45.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.20.010]

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-07-15