[1]刘国铭,林世水,周仕国.经皮椎间孔镜和椎板开窗减压术治疗 腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效对比[J].医学信息,2018,(17):66-70.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.17.020]
 LIU Guo-ming,LIN Shi-shui,ZHOU Shi-guo.Comparison of Clinical Outcomes between Percutaneous Transforaminal Decompression and Decompression of Vertebral Lamina Fenestration in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation[J].Medical Information,2018,(17):66-70.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.17.020]
点击复制

经皮椎间孔镜和椎板开窗减压术治疗 腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效对比()
分享到:

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
期数:
2018年17期
页码:
66-70
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2018-09-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes between Percutaneous Transforaminal Decompression and Decompression of Vertebral Lamina Fenestration in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation
文章编号:
1006-1959(2018)17-0066-05
作者:
刘国铭林世水周仕国
福建省立金山医院骨科,福建 福州 350001
Author(s):
LIU Guo-mingLIN Shi-shuiZHOU Shi-guo
Department of Orthopaedics,Lijinshan Hospital,Fuzhou 350001,Fujian,China
关键词:
腰椎间盘突出症经皮椎间孔镜手术椎板开窗减压术
Keywords:
Key words:Lumbar disc herniationPercutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgeryDecompression of vertebral lamina fenestration
分类号:
R687.3
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.17.020
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 对比经皮椎间孔镜技术和椎板开窗减压术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效。方法 收集我院2017年2月~12月住院手术治疗的腰椎间盘突出症患者60例,随机分为经皮椎间孔镜组和椎板开窗组,每组30例。经皮椎间孔镜组采用经皮椎间孔镜手术治疗,椎板开窗组采用椎板开窗髓核摘除手术治疗。对比两组患者手术切口长度、术中出血量和手术时间,于术前、术后7 d、术后1个月、术后3个月和术后6个月采用VAS评分评价患者疼痛程度,采用ODI指数评价患者脊柱活动功能,末次随访时行Macnab疗效评级。结果 与椎板开窗组比较,经皮椎间孔镜组的手术切口长度缩短,术中出血量减少,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者术后VAS评分、ODI指数均较术前降低,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。经皮椎间孔镜组术后7 d和术后1个月的VAS评分、ODI指数低于椎板开窗组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组治疗有效率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 经皮椎间孔镜和椎板开窗减压术均可有效治疗腰椎间盘突出症,经皮椎间孔技术更有利于术后早期疼痛症状缓解和脊柱功能恢复。
Abstract:
Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopy and decompression of vertebral lamina fenestration in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.Methods 60 patients with lumbar disc herniation who were hospitalized from February to December 2017 were randomly divided into percutaneous transforaminal endoscopy group and decompression of vertebral lamina fenestration group with 30 cases in each group.Percutaneous transforaminoscopic surgery was performed in the group of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopy,laminectomy and nucleus pulposus resection was performed in the group of decompression of vertebral lamina fenestration.The operation incision length,intraoperative bleeding volume and operation time were compared between the two groups.VAS score was used to evaluate the pain degree before operation,7d after operation,1 month after operation,3 months after operation and 6 months after operation.ODI index was used to evaluate the spinal motion function of the patients.At the last follow-up,the curative effect of Macnab was evaluated.Results Compared with the decompression of vertebral lamina fenestration group,the length of incision was shortened and the amount of bleeding was reduced in the percutaneous transforaminal endoscopy group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The postoperative VAS score and ODI index of the two groups were significantly lower than those before operation,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The VAS score and ODI index of the transforaminal endoscopy group were significantly lower than those of the decompression of vertebral lamina fenestration group at 7d and 1 month after operation,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the effective rate between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopy and decompression of vertebral lamina fenestration can effectively treat lumbar disc herniation.Percutaneous transforaminal decompression is more conducive to early postoperative pain relief and spinal function recovery.

参考文献/References:

[1]Karakasli A,Yildiz DV,Kumtepe E,et al.Biomechanical comparison of intact lumbar lamb spine and endoscopic discectomized lamb spine[J].Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi,2013,24(1):33-38. [2]周跃,李长青,王建,等.椎间孔镜YESS与TESSYS技术治疗腰椎间盘突出症[J].中华骨科杂志,2010,30(3):225-231. [3]赵显,宋涛,孙新宏.椎间孔镜技术与椎板间开窗治疗双节段腰椎间盘突出症的疗效观察[J].临床骨科杂志,2015,18(6):662-666. [4]Kelly AM.The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain[J].Emergency Medicine Journal Emj,2001,18(3):205. [5]Fairbank JC,Pynsent PB.The Oswestry Disability Index[J].Spine,2017,25(22):2940. [6]刘绮,马超,伍少玲,等.Oswestry功能障碍指数评定慢性腰痛患者的效度分析[J].中国康复医学杂志,2010,25(3):228-231. [7]李盛华,周明旺,李亚军,等.微创术治疗腰椎间盘突出症研究现状[J].中国骨伤,2012,25(4):348-352. [8]Gupta RS,Wu XT,Hong X,et al.Technique of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation[J].Open Journal of Orthopedics,2015,5(7):208-216. [9]Gibson JNA,Cowie JG,Iprenburg M.Transforaminal endoscopic spinal surgery:The future 'gold standard'for discectomy a review[J].Surgeon,2012,10(5):290-296. [10]沙宇,周红刚,马海军,等.经皮椎间孔镜在腰椎间盘突出症治疗中的应用[J].实用骨科杂志,2012,18(5):437-439. [11]徐宝山,马信龙,夏群,等.椎间孔镜TESSYS技术治疗腰椎间盘突出症效果分析[J].天津医药,2014,42(5):470-472. [12]Liao Z,Chen W,Wang CH.Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic surgery for far lateral lumbar intervertebral disk herniation[J].Orthopedics,2014,37(8):e717. [13]吴泉兵.小切口椎板间开窗髓核摘除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症59例临床分析[J].吉林医学,2014,35(2):331-332.

相似文献/References:

[1]王钦奋,周仕国,刘国铭,等.腰椎间盘突出炎性因子与神经根性疼痛相关性研究[J].医学信息,2018,(15):59.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.15.019]
 WANG Qin-fen,ZHOU Shi-guo,LIU Guo-ming,et al.Correlation between Inflammatory Factors and Nerve Root Pain in Protrusion of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc[J].Medical Information,2018,(17):59.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.15.019]
[2]丁永国,李昌隆,孙建民,等.经皮穿刺椎间孔镜下应用TESSYS技术治疗 腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效观察[J].医学信息,2018,(16):38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.16.011]
 DING Yong-guo,LI Chang-long,SUN Jian-min,et al.Clinical Observation of Percutaneous Lumbar Disc Herniation Treated by TESSYS Technique under Transforaminal Endoscopy[J].Medical Information,2018,(17):38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.16.011]

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-09-01