[1]苟险峰.不同手术方式治疗输尿管结石的效果分析[J].医学信息,2018,(17):92-94.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.17.028]
 GOU Xian-feng.Analysis of the Effect of Different Surgical Methods in the Treatment of Ureteral Calculi[J].Medical Information,2018,(17):92-94.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.17.028]
点击复制

不同手术方式治疗输尿管结石的效果分析()
分享到:

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
期数:
2018年17期
页码:
92-94
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2018-09-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of the Effect of Different Surgical Methods in the Treatment of Ureteral Calculi
文章编号:
1006-1959(2018)17-0092-03
作者:
苟险峰
四川省攀枝花市中西医结合医院泌尿科,四川 攀枝花 617000
Author(s):
GOU Xian-feng
Department of Urology,Panzhihua Hospital of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine,Panzhihua 617000,Sichuan,China
关键词:
微创经皮肾镜钬激光碎石取石术输尿管结石不同手术方式
Keywords:
Key words:Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy holmium laser lithotripsyUreteral calculiDifferent surgical methods
分类号:
R699.4
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.17.028
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 观察分析三种不同手术方式治疗输尿管结石的效果。方法 选取本院2016年12月~2017年12月收治的210例输尿管结石患者,按照数字随机表法分为A、B、C三组,每组70例。A组应用开放性输尿管切开取石术,B组应用体外冲击波碎石术,C组应用微创经皮肾镜钬激光碎石取石术。采用统计学分析三组输尿管结石患者的一次性成功率、术后结石完全清除率、平均住院时间、平均手术时间以及平均术中出血量、患者总满意率。结果 C组患者的一次性成功率、术后结石完全清除率等临床治疗效果,高于A组、B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),A组患者的平均手术时间、平均住院时间高于C组、B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),B组平均术中出血量少于A组、C组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);C组患者的总满意率高于A组、B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 微创经皮肾镜钬激光碎石取石术治疗输尿管结石患者的临床效果显著高于体外冲击波碎石术和开放性输尿管切开取石术。
Abstract:
Abstract:Objective To observe the effect of three different surgical methods in the treatment of ureteral calculi.Methods A total of 210 patients with ureteral calculi admitted to our hospital from December 2016 to December 2017 were divided into three groups:A, B,and C according to the numerical random table method,70 cases in each group.Group A was treated with open ureterolithotomy, group B was treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy,and group C was treated with minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy with holmium laser lithotripsy.The one-time success rate,complete stone removal rate,average hospitalization time, average operation time,average intraoperative blood loss,and total patient satisfaction rate were analyzed by statistical analysis of three groups of patients with ureteral calculi.Results The clinical outcomes of group C patients with one-time success rate and complete postoperative stone removal rate were higher than those in group A and group B,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The average operation time and average hospitalization time of patients in group A were higher than those in group C and B,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The average intraoperative blood loss in group B was less than that in group A and C.The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);the total satisfaction rate of patients in group C was higher than that in group A and group B,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The clinical outcome of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy with holmium laser lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteral calculi is significantly higher than extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and open ureterolithotomy.

参考文献/References:

[1]廖勇,李康,黄建林,等.不同手术方式治疗复杂性输尿管上段结石的疗效比较[J].昆明医科大学学报,2014,11(2):73-76. [2]林峰,陈军,王鸿康,等.不同手术方式治疗输尿管结石的效果分析[J].中国全科医学,2014,15(17):2036-2039. [3]李辉,王伟高,谢波,等.输尿管镜钬激光碎石术对输尿管结石术患者发生感染的可行性及安全性研究[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2015,16(8):1857-1859. [4]朱志国,马建芬.不同微创术式治疗输尿管上段嵌顿性结石临床观察[J].陕西医学杂志,2013,42(7):846-848. [5]石英,张悦,谢龙,等.输尿管软镜取石治疗老年上段嵌顿输尿管结石患者的效果[J].重庆医学,2017,46(23):3274-3276. [6]李远伟,吴万瑞,卢强,等.输尿管结石合并尿脓毒血症致血小板减少患者外科手术的有效性及安全性分析[J].中国全科医学,2014,15(15):1778-1780. [7]王光,陈美凤,黄承智,等.三种不同治疗方案治疗输尿管上段结石的实效性对照探究[J].国际泌尿系统杂志,2015,35(6):820-823. [8]王伟强,李升,陈映鹤,等.经皮肾镜碎石术与经输尿管镜(联合封堵器)碎石术治疗输尿管上段结石的临床比较[J].浙江医学,2016,38(10):704-706. [9]关宗杰,李志军.经皮肾微造瘘取石术治疗输尿管上段结石的临床疗效[J].国际医药卫生导报,2015,21(14):2026-2028. [10]吴德尧,潘慧星.输尿管镜下钬激光碎石术与腹腔镜手术治疗输尿管结石的疗效[J].江苏医药,2017,43(9):644-647.

相似文献/References:

[1]江宏飞.经输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术治疗输尿管结石的临床效果观察[J].医学信息,2018,(04):111.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.04.038]
 JIANG Hong-fei.Clinical Effect of Pneumatic Lithotripsy through Ureteroscope in the Treatment of Ureteral Calculi[J].Medical Information,2018,(17):111.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.04.038]
[2]彭 瑛.综合护理干预对输尿管结石URSL术后 治疗效果的影响分析[J].医学信息,2018,(09):172.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.09.057]
 PENG Ying.Analysis of the Effect of Comprehensive Nursing Intervention on Ureteral Calculi after URSL Procedure[J].Medical Information,2018,(17):172.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.09.057]
[3]黄东亮,思建民.MSCT非增强扫描在输尿管结石诊断中的应用[J].医学信息,2018,(15):148.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.16.048]
 HUANG Dong-liang,SI Jian-min.Application of MSCT Non-enhanced Scanning in Diagnosis of Kidney and Ureter Calculi[J].Medical Information,2018,(17):148.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.16.048]

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-09-01