[1]张 畅.老年急性心肌梗死并心源性休克冠状动脉 介入治疗的临床效果研究[J].医学信息,2018,(17):101-103.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.17.031]
 ZHANG Chang.Clinical Effect of Coronary Intervention in Elderly Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock[J].Medical Information,2018,(17):101-103.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.17.031]
点击复制

老年急性心肌梗死并心源性休克冠状动脉 介入治疗的临床效果研究()
分享到:

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
期数:
2018年17期
页码:
101-103
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2018-09-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical Effect of Coronary Intervention in Elderly Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock
文章编号:
1006-1959(2018)17-0101-03
作者:
张 畅
天津医科大学第四中心临床学院ICU,天津 300221
Author(s):
ZHANG Chang
ICU,the Fourth Central Clinical College,Tianjin Medical University,Tianjin 300221,China
关键词:
老年急性心肌梗死心源性休克冠状动脉
Keywords:
Key words:Elderly acute myocardial infarctionCardiogenic shockCoronary artery
分类号:
R542.22
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.17.031
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨冠状动脉介入治疗老年急性心肌梗死并心源性休克的临床价值。方法 回顾性分析2013年7月~2017年11月在我院接受治疗的155例老年急性心肌梗死并心源性休克患者的临床资料,根据治疗方式分为溶栓组(80例)与介入治疗组(75例)。比较两组患者尿量、心率、左心室射血分数(LVEF)以及血管开通率。结果 治疗后,介入组尿量多于溶栓组,HR值低于溶栓组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);住院前及出院6个月后,介入组LVEF值均高于溶栓组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);溶栓组出院6个月后,LVEF值高于出院前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);介入组出院前后LVEF值对比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);介入组血管开通率为93.33%,高于溶栓组的77.50%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 冠状动脉介入为治疗老年急性心肌梗死并心源性休克患者的有效手段,可有效改善血液流变学、尿量,利于心功能恢复。
Abstract:
Abstract:Objective To investigate the clinical value of coronary intervention in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock.Methods The clinical data of 155 elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock who were treated in our hospital from July 2013 to November 2017 were retrospectively analyzed.According to the treatment,it was divided into thrombolytic group(80 cases)and interventional treatment group(75 cases).Urinary volume,heart rate,left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF),and vascular access rate were compared between the two groups.Results After treatment,the urine volume of the intervention group was higher than that of the thrombolysis group,and the HR value was lower than that of the thrombolytic group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Before hospitalization and 6 months after discharge,the LVEF values of the intervention group were higher than those of the thrombolysis group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).After 6 months of discharge in the thrombolytic group,the LVEF value was higher than that before discharge,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The LVEF value of the intervention group before and after discharge was not statistically significant(P>0.05);the vascular access rate of the intervention group was 93.33%,which was higher than that of the thrombolytic group 77.50%,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Coronary artery intervention is an effective method for the treatment of elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock.It can effectively improve hemorheology and urine output and facilitate cardiac function recovery.

参考文献/References:

[1]王鹏,戴海龙,尹小龙.急性心肌梗死并心源性休克的研究进展[J].中国心血管病研究,2017,15(2):97-99. [2]高红.32例心源性休克临床治疗分析[J].医学信息,2016,29(24):255. [3]王霁翔,高静,任珉,等.早期保护性肺通气和主动脉内球囊反搏联合急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克的疗效[J].中华老年医学杂志,2017,36(7):724-729. [4]张国领,张铮,王瑾懿,等.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克的临床干预治疗[J].中国医药导报,2017,14(5):39-42,50. [5]陈妍,高明东,李晓卫,等.老年人急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克临床特点分析[J].中华老年医学杂志,2016,35(9):939-943. [6]张国领,张铮,靳志涛,等.老年急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克的临床特征及介入治疗的预后研究[J].中国医药导报,2017,14(2):78-80,84. [7]宁小方,姬富才.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克病人行主动脉内球囊反搏术联合经皮冠状动脉介入术的临床疗效分析[J].安徽医药,2017,21(8):1442-1445. [8]方毅,王效增.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者急诊介入治疗近远期疗效分析[J].临床军医杂志,2016,44(11):1124-1127.

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-09-01